Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender bias in the workplace against women
Gender bias in the workplace against women
Hostile sexism in the work place
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender bias in the workplace against women
According to Wikipedia, “Matrix of Domination is a sociological paradigm that explains issues of oppression that deal with race, class, and gender, which, though recognized as different social classifications, are all interconnected (Wikipedia). There are countless social problems that affect the each person physically and mentally. Most people wake up and within the first twenty minutes of getting ready, they look in the mirror. The most common matrices of domination are gender, race, and social class. This is because we see the separation between people because of these. What if you weren’t happy with yourself because you had been called harsh names because of your gender, race, or social class? Some people wake up and do not feel accomplished because of the strain our society has embedded in our minds so we think and act a certain way. Each matrix of domination is obvious each and everyday, we may just not even think about it.
Gender inequality is present in the workplace, school, and other public environments. Peggy McIntosh, wrote a checklist about privileges for men that woman lack. If a man does not get a promotion in the workplace, it is not because of his gender. If a man does not succeed in his job, he is not seen as a failure to all men. When people hear that a man does not want to have children, it is not a selfish decision. The author includes that men are unaware of the privileges they have because they are able to walk into a boardroom and not feel out numbered. Imagine one day if eighty percent of the Hewlett Packard team members were woman. Every top paid corporate officer was a female and every man had to report to a female manager. The environment would be significantly different than it is today. The article ...
... middle of paper ...
...Mar. 2014.
"Female Privilege." Feminist Critics. N.p., 8 June 2008. Web. 14 Mar. 2014.
McIntosh, Peggy. "The Male Privilege Checklist." Alas a Blog. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Mar. 2014.
"Michael Kimmel: On Gender (Clip)." YouTube. YouTube, 19 Feb. 2008. Web. 15 Mar. 2014.
Rehnstrom, Kyle. "Racial Salary Discrimination in the NBA: 2008-2009." University of North Iowa College of Business. N.p., 2009. Web. 14 Mar. 2014.
"Types of Social Classes of People." Types of Social Classes of People. Cliff Notes, n.d. Web. 14 Mar. 2014.
Wikipedia contributors. "Matrix of Domination." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 19 Jul. 2013. Web. 14 Mar. 2014.
Woods, David. "Equal Pay? Not on the Basketball Court." USATODAY.COM. USA TODAY, 19 May 2012. Web. 14 Mar. 2014.
Woods, Jewel. "The Black Male Privileges Checklist." N.p., 2008. Web. 14 Mar. 2014.
Sobocinski, Eric J. "College Athletes: What is Fair Compensation?." Marquette Sports Law Review 7:257. http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1172&context=sportslaw
Posnanski, Joe. “College Athletes Should Not Be Paid.” Norton Sampler: Short Essays for Composition, 8th ed. Pages 584-590. 2013.
“Should NCAA Athletes Be Paid?” US News. U.S. News and World Report, Apr. 2013. Web. 05
The two articles that had a profound impact to my understanding of race, class and gender in the United States was White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack by Peggy McIntosh and Imagine a Country by Holly Sklar. McIntosh explains the keys aspects of unearned advantage (a privilege that one group hold over another) as well as conferred dominance (the act of voluntarily giving another group power) and the relationship that these factors hold when determine power of a social group. Additionally, the purpose of McIntosh’s article was to demonstrate the privilege that certain individuals carry and how that translates to the social structures of our society. Furthermore, conferred dominance also contributes to the power of the dominant group
Greenlee, Craig T. "College Athletes Deserve Some Equity." Black Issues in Higher Education 27 Apr. 2000: 62. Questia School. Web. 3 Feb. 2014.
Mitchell, Horace, and Marc Edelman. "Should College Student-Athletes Be Paid?." U.S. News Digital Weekly 5.52 (2013): 17.Academic Search Complete. Web. 23 Apr. 2014.
As a member of the dominant race in America, I know that I possess certain unearned privileges that allow me to be more successful overall. I was raised with the mindset that racism doesn't affect me because I am white. The U.S. education system taught me about my racial and ethnic history, but it is likely that my classmates of different races could not say the same. I learned about racism in school but not to view whites as privileged or degrading towards subordinate groups. My group was never seen at fault for oppression or took any responsibility for it. Myself, nor my peers, were ever seen or viewed as unfairly advantaged or privileged. I grew up under the impression that any person could achieve what they wanted if they simply worked hard
Eitzen, D. Stanley. "College Athletes Should Be Paid." Sports and Athletes. Ed. James D. Torr.
Woods, Al. “College Athletes Should Be Paid.” Sports and Athletes: An Anthology. Ed. Christine Watkins. Greenhaven Press, 2009. 87-94. Print.
Daugherty, Paul. "College athletes already have advantages and shouldn't be paid." Sports Illustrated. Sports Illustrated, 20 Jan. 2012. Web. 25 Apr. 2014. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/paul_daugherty/01/20/no.pay/
Women have progressed from house wives to business women over the past hundred years. In 1948, 28.6% of the people in the work force were women. In 2015, this percentage has increased to 46.8% (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2015). Progression is visible and very possible, but it seems that our chances for equal pay are very improbable. From a person perspective, I had the opportunity to focus on basketball, let my efforts and love for the sport pay for college, and continue on playing in the WNBA. With in-depth research, I quickly reconsidered. Phoenix Mercury’s Diana Taurasi made a maximum salary of $107,800 one season after winning the championship. The NBA team, Phoenix Suns, picked up Dionte Christmas who only played for 198 minutes during the whole season and he obtained the minimum payment of $490,800 just for being a bench warmer (Berri, 2015). It is bad enough that he made $300,000 more than Taurasi, but it is more inconceivable that an NBA starter will receive $14.7 million a
Walker, Jim. "Paying College Athletes Debate Continues." McClatchy - Tribune Business NewsJun 08 2011. ProQuest. Web. 26 Nov. 2013 .
Critics of feminist studies of men often argue that the politics to change values and behaviour need to come from men themselves, because feminist women’s long efforts against gender discrimination, misogyny, sexual harassment, rape, battering, and male violence have often created backlash and stubborn resistance from men (Lorber, 2012, 274). If men do not fight for what they want they will not see change, it will not be handed to them as many things have already been. Although, the question presumes, why would men want to change something that they feel is just fine? This is where controversy takes place. A change must occur in order for things to be equal. Men do not always have to be the breadwinners; On the other hand, areas that seemed to indicate potential gender equality – fatherhood and men doing “women’s work” – have ironically restored gender inequality. This refers to the racialized glass escalator. Where men who do women’s work have reliable preferences in the working environment, such that even in occupations where men are numerical in minorities they are likely to enjoy higher wages and faster promotions (Lorber, 2012, p.264) In addition, men get daddy bonuses when they become fathers while women workers suffer a motherhood penalty in reduced wages (Lorber, 2012, 274). Limitations such as these reinforce gender
When you think of a CEO of a company or of world political leaders, do you think of a man or of a woman? Many, if not most of us, see these positions as being held by men. In this essay, I will explain why women are still not equal to men. In the first paragraph I will discuss inequalities that happen in the workplace. The second section will show the differences that occur within the athletic world. Thirdly, I will explain the differences in education and home life. Even though we are approaching the twenty-first century, women in our society are still not equal to men.
Money can give people a lot opportunities and privilege. Financially privileged people have no trouble getting materialistic things such as big houses, expensive cars, and jewelry. Being privileged can also provide better scholastic education as well as respect. On the other hand, a lack of money, as a person might guess, limits opportunity and lower a person’s status on the privilege pole. In order for an underprivileged person to have all of those things, they have to work hard to get to get the luxuries of nice houses, cars, and jewelry. As far as education goes, the underprivileged might not go to the best schools but they get an education that will prove to be more valuable in life; they learn to earn respect, appreciate what they have and how to survive with just the necessities and what’s really important in life. So when a person looks at each group and tries to decided with one gets the most out of life, they will see that underprivileged individuals get so much more out of life than a person who came up in affluence and privilege.