Power In The Crucible

1610 Words4 Pages

The most skilful composers will be able to effectively represent the deception which can arise from the ulterior motives behind politics. The indication that political motivations may be ambiguous but control is the ultimate goal, is represented in Author Miller’s play The Crucible and Richard Eyre’s 2006 film, ‘Notes on a Scandal’. Both textual forms are able to demonstrate relationships which revolve around political influences for the motivations of power and control over a desired companion. This, in turn, displays an authoritative status that often comes into concern over the wellbeing of others. Knowledge of the truth has the ability to bind relationships into a manipulative and controlling state with the power to disassemble an individual …show more content…

However these motivations are justified through religious self-righteousness. A form of this corruption is particularly evident in Reverend Parris, the main minister of the village, as his supposedly holy character is stained with a greed for money, reputation and control of the court; “There is either obedience or the church will burn like hell is burning!” Exclamatory dramatic language is seen in the scene of their quarrels over the minister deserving a house to be donated by the community. This emphasises his god-like power as a minister which enables him to control the fate of the church and the fate of the people. “I have Sought here three long years to bend these stiff-necked people to me”, demonstrates a tone of voice which is high in modality to dramatize the importance of status to Paris as he distresses over losing his control in the village. Author miller represents Paris’ continues selfish concerns from the beginning of the play, ever since the possibility of witchcraft came about as he states to Abigail, “Now tell me true, Abigail. And I pray you feel the weight of truth upon you, for now my ministry’s at stake, my ministry and perhaps your cousins life”. Furthermore, the main antagonist Abigail’s threats in Act 1, as Betty became ill and witchcraft was suspected …show more content…

John Proctor’s tragic hero attempts to redeem himself through his individuality and non-conformist attitudes but this resulted also in his death. The thematic representation of the play takes the audience on an extremely tense and frustrating cycle of events that is ultimately pointless and destructive as Danforth claims; “We burn a hot fire here, it melts down all concealment”. Tension is emphasised in the dramatic techniques such as lighting devices. In Act 1; the darkness represents mystery and dishonesty, as the play progresses into Act 2, there is a weak light symbolising the rise of politics. By Act 3 bright lights stream through the windows, representing confessions and revelations. However, Act 4, begins in darkness then ends in bright light, representing that while Proctor’s resistance of political corruption resulted in his death, he is able to claim a moral victory and this gives the audience a sense of tragic catharsis as they journey with this tragic hero. Such theatrical techniques and representations emphasise the succession of tension throughout the play and the widespread effect of individual politics. The significant characterisation of John Proctor comes into effect as he is made the hero with the fatal flaw of lechery, “It is a whores vengeance, and you must see it; I set myself entirely in your

Open Document