Positive And Negative Effects Of The Writs Of Assistance On Free Society

784 Words2 Pages

For almost every issue ever to come up in history, there have been people who have had differing opinions on how to react to it. These reactions lead to one group resisting against the other, and it brings change to society – good or bad. There are both positives and negatives that come out of peaceful resistance, but for the Writs of Assistance, the positives outweigh the negatives, and these positives have had lasting effects on free society, even into today. The Writs of Assistance were issued by the British government in response to the colonists avoiding the trade laws and smuggling goods into and out of the country so they didn't have to trade with Britain (Alchin). The British then began conducting searches to find foreign goods. The …show more content…

Fifty-three Boston merchants came together to fight the law, but they did so through the court system under James Otis. He went on a famous five-hour speech about how unfair the laws were (Alchin). These men did could not tolerate the fact that Britain had completely taken away their right to have a private home, and they did something about it. A small number of fifty-three people had a much larger impact than they would ever know. Someone quickly impacted by these men was John Adams. He said, “Then and there was the first scene of the first act of opposition to the arbitrary claims of Great Britain. Then and there was the Child Independence Born.” (qtd. in Fraenkel). He saw how inspired Otis was and how he was able to be so passionate about an issue, and it greatly affected him, propelling him to stand up for what he believed in, leading him to become one of the most prominent figures during this time period. Along with John Adams, the resistance to the Writs led to the uniting of the people against a common enemy, and also allowed them to attempt to change the laws to reflect what they believed in. It showed them that they could take action against authority when they needed to, and that the authority might actually …show more content…

He claimed that all people had, “these rights to be derived only from nature and the Author of nature; that they were inherent, inalienable, and indefeasible by any laws, pacts, contracts, covenants, or stipulations which man could devise.” (James Otis). Locke’s ideas of the right to life, liberty, and property were greatly cherished, as they became the foundation for American rights. When Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence, he included that people needed the right to life and liberty, as he was inspired by John Locke as well. This inspiration sprouted from James Otis and his use of Locke’s rights. The negative impacts this had was that the whole ordeal could be viewed as somewhat discouraging, as the Writs were left in place. However, the positive American viewpoint, it was seen as a uniting of the people for a common cause, for ordinary people getting the opportunity to challenge the highest British officials. “Otis’ speech has been given a place of pride… The opening scene of American resistance,” (Farrell). Another negative effect is that the Writs were so hated that many felt as if they could not live in America without having them outlawed. When ratifying the Constitution, the people would not accept it without a Bill of Rights, as they did not want to be subject to being searched for no reason. This made the ratification process much longer and more complicated, driving people

Open Document