Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The influence of social media on politics
The influence of social media on politics
The influence of social media on politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The influence of social media on politics
During the 2014 midterm election, analysts recorded the lowest voter turnout since World War II (DelReal). Only 36.4 percent of the eligible voting population cast ballots, which illustrates the continuing decline in midterm election voting participation (DelReal). While the results are disappointing, analysts are not shocked; since the 1964 election, when voter turnout was almost 49 percent, political participation has experienced continual decreases (DelReal). The decline cannot be ignored, as all people must participate in government processes in order to promote freedom of speech. Therefore, the United States of America must address the issue of low political participation, but this is a complicated task. One solution, which appears to …show more content…
Many studies have analyzed the impact that Facebook exerts on political involvement. One study was conducted on the Congressional midterm election day of 2010, when over sixty million users on Facebook received a special message encouraging them to vote. These users observed messages at the top of their news feed pointing to the nearest poll places, offering a place to select “I Voted,” and displaying a list of their friends who had already voted. Two smaller groups, with roughly six-hundred thousand people each, were the control groups. One group was given voter-encouragement messages without reference to the behavior of Facebook friends. The other did not receive any voting-related messages. The researchers also analyzed the voting behavior of 6.3 million subjects using records available to the public. The study found that “the Facebook social message increased turnout directly by about 60,000 voters and indirectly through social media contagion by another 280,000 voters, for a total of 340,000 additional votes” (Bond et al, 5). Therefore, online political messages do contribute to a visible difference in voting behavior. Facebook, as a specific source of entertainment, can be used to positively impact voter …show more content…
Class differences, particularly those concerning the amount of education, are eminent in online, offline, and social networking site (SNS) activity. However, the class differences are less noticeable in the SNS sphere. Furthermore, political engagement on SNS drastically increased between 2008 and 2012, when the survey was conducted. According to the Pew Research Center, “the number of social networking site users has grown from 33% of the online population in 2008 to 69% of the online population in 2012.” With this increase comes a notable number of SNS users that claim their SNS activity that led them to conduct additional research and become involved in social and political issues. Lastly, despite the growth of online platforms designed specifically for political activities, “Americans’ day-to-day political conversations mostly occur offline” (Smith). The source illuminates the wide range of factors that could influence one’s political activity in this new era of technological advancements. Politicians must be weary of their campaign strategies, as a strategy that combines online messages with offline messages appears to be most
"Miller light and bud light…either way you end up with a mighty weak beer!" This is how Jim Hightower (a Texan populist speaker) described the choices that the U.S. electorate had in the 2000 elections. This insinuates that there is a clear lack of distinction between the parties. Along with numerous others, this is one of the reasons why the turnout is so low in the U.S. elections. In trying to explain the low figures at the U.S. elections, analysts have called American voters apathetic to indifferent to downright lazy. I disagree that the 50% (in recent elections) of voters that fail to turnout to vote are lazy and that they have just reason not too. I will also show that the problem lies within the system itself in that the institutional arrangements, electoral and governmental, do not create an environment that is conducive to mass participation. I will address these main issues and several others that have an effect on voter participation. In doing so I will compare America to other established democracies.
Among the many ways Americans can participate in politics, voting is considered one of the most common and important ways for Americans to get involved. The outcome of any election, especially at the national level, determines who will be making and enforcing the laws that all Americans must abide by. With this in mind one might assume that all Americans are active voters, but studies show the voter turnout is actually astonishingly low. With this unsettling trend it is important to know what statistics say about voter turnout as was as the four major factors that influence participation: Socioeconomic status, education, political environment, and state electoral laws, in order to help boost turnout in future elections.
Regardless of the political environment, it is the responsibility of voters to take initiative in becoming politically involved. However, the current electoral system in the United States is not one that fosters voter participation, but instead often discourages voting altogether. This is evidenced through the lackluster voter turnout in the United States, which is amongst the lowest of any democratic nation. While it is convenient to blame this lack of democratic participation on a lazy and apathetic public, the root of the problem lies elsewhere. The current system of winner-take-all elections, strategic gerrymandering, incumbency advantage and governmental unresponsiveness to constituent desires is enough to deter even the most politically consci...
From its early period, the United States has obtained an indirect type of democracy, and has always had contentment that its citizens are allowed to vote for their representatives, especially the President. Nevertheless, the amount of citizens that actually vote in nationwide elections has decreased noticeably over the years. Voter participation and turnout has been declining in the United States throughout history. Voter turnout, the percentage of eligible individuals who actually vote (Ginsberg), to this day is lower than it was in the 1900’s. Since 1912, presidential elections have only had about 50 to 65 percent of Americans participate. This means that about half of United States citizens who are eligible and have the freedom to vote have failed to participate in presidential elections. At the end of the nineteenth century voter turnout started plummeting, reaching the 60 percent level by the election of 1912 (Teixeira, 1987). The declining rate of voter participation in the United States is due to voter registration and procedu...
One of the properties that allow social media to be an attractive tool to use by politicians is the ability to attract a massive audience of users. The Pew Research Center suggests that there is a growing number of social media users. A whooping 73% of US adults use the internet (Social Networking Fact Sheet). These...
Voting is one of the citizens’ rights living in a country. In the past, not everyone can vote. Voting used to be for only white American men. However, our ancestors fought for that rights. Eventually, any American who are older than eighteen can vote, despite their race or gender. In addition, voter turnout is used to keep track of the voting. It is the percentage of eligible voters who cast a ballot in an election. Unfortunately, the voter turnout has been decreasing over time, and it means that there are less and fewer people who actually show up and vote. This essay will discuss the voter turnout in Harris County, Texas.
Voter turnout has been declining in the United States throughout history, due to the potential voters’ personal choice not to vote and ineligibility. According to research, a large percentage of individuals are not voting because political parties fail to appeal to the voters and this leads to the voting population losing interest in the campaign, while others postpone registering and by the time they realize their delay the election is upon them. This downward trend of voter turnout can be traced to the reforms of the Progressive era. Turnout in post-Progressive era America remained low, never reaching the levels attained before the Progressive era reforms. This would be expected, since there is little in the political history of these years that would indicate a return to a collectively oriented system of voter participation.
Three of the most popular social media sites are Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube (Alexa, 2011b). These sites have different uses for diverse kinds of people. For a normal person, Facebook or Twitter might be a website that is used to connect with friends and family. However, research suggests that, “...it soon became apparent that social media could be used for other political purposes, from simply providing a forum for like-minded political dissidents to voice their opinions, to being used for organising and instigating major political riots and even revolutions (Earl and Kimport, 2011; Papic and Noonan, 2011).” This is an important fact to consider whi...
The 2008 presidential election was historic. The United States elected its first African-American president and the use of the internet and social media greatly influenced the way elections played out for the first time in history. This election set a precedent for the way politicians could use social media to reach out to voters who they may not otherwise have a connection with. Mass media and social media changed the way elections played out by increasing voter intelligence, encouraging young people and people of color to vote, and spreading propaganda via the internet.
Rainie, Smith, Schlozman, Brady, and Verba (2012) present that social media is starting to become a feature of political and civil engagement for many Americans. Rainie concludes this finding from analyzing a survey that asked users about civic engagement using social networking sites like Twitter. They found that 60% of American adults use social networking sites like Facebook or Twitter, 39% of them have done at least one of eight civic or political activities with social media. The demographic that uses social media for civic activities the most were younger social media users that ranged from age 18-29 years old. They concluded from the survey that younger users were more likely to post their own thoughts about issues and encourage others to take political action while older users were more likely to stay
Social media has changed the way that people interact with one another for the rest of time. People can use social media to share their lives, opinions, and more importantly their political views. Some of the most popular social media platforms are Facebook, where one can post their own thoughts along with pictures and video, Twitter, where one posts short messages, Instagram, where one posts pictures along with captions, Tumblr, where one can post a variety of different media, and Snapchat, where one can share videos and picture with their friends for a short amount of time. Now that people are able to share whatever they would like on the internet, some have used this as a way to spread political initiatives through these platforms. Social
The researchers present findings that indicate that a politician’s popularity in the voting booth may be related to the frequency with which the candidate is talked about on social media. The researchers goes on to discuss how further research may conclude that social media has a bigger impact on voting outcomes than traditional forms of media, and how that could potentially shape the future of voting.
Political campaigns in the 21st Century have changed over the past years, especially because of the growing presence that social media platforms have received in the everyday life of society.
Social media such as twitter and Facebook is an important tool for people get information and communicate with others in modern society. A report from Pew Research Center shows that 64 percent of people get news from social media(Beres). Almost everyone has their own social media account and so does politician. Social media citizens an assess to know and communicate with politicians. Donald Trump, who is the candidate of president in the United States, is very good at using social media. He used to write a tweet that described Clinton aide Huma Abedin as “a major security risk” and “the wife of perv slazebag Anthony Wiener.” Once he wrote, his million followers on Twitter can see it(Carr). Trump attract audiences by using a lot of exaggerated words and emotions, while some candidates that are not good at using those media skills might not as popular as Trump. In this situation, many politicians might only improve their skill to attract citizens’ attention by using social media. They might either belittle their competitors or show their personal life to satisfy their follower. What they are more focus on is not the politics itself but the skill that can catch attentions. However, as a politician, trying to solve problems citizens worrying is primary thing that should do. On the other hand, everyone can post their own opinions in social media and some opinions might
Internet has been acknowledged as one of the most efficient way to collect and reflect public opinions, for that people with different classes and races can express their opinions with no obstacles in virtual network spaces. People can speak out whatever they want just by typing on the keyboard within a second. Dr. Heather Savigny mentions in her article “Public Opinion, Political Communication and the Internet” that “The expansion of the internet as a new method of communication provides a potential challenge to the primacy of the traditional media and political parties as formers of public opinion” (1). People realized that the power of internet public opinion in the focus on social issues can be used as a weapon to affect government decision-makings. However, does public opinion only brings positive effects?