Phidias Golden Ratio

889 Words2 Pages

The golden ratio is a ‘famous’ number that is said to be recurring throughout the world. Architects are said to build with it, painters are said to use it, even sculpter are said to sculpt with it. The Greeks found this ‘Golden Section’ called phi around 500 BC. Phidias was a Greek sculptor and mathematician who is said to have studied phi. Today, there are many claims of where we can find the golden ratio. Whether or not these claims are accurate is the real question. There is a claim that the golden rectangle whose sides have a 1:1.618 ratio is the most esthetically pleasing. Having tested this theory in class, there is no proof of validity. In our class, out of approximately sixteen students, only one picked the golden rectangle. In the …show more content…

The average length of the sides at 755.79 ft and the average height is 481.4 ft. The ratio between the two are 1.62, which is less than a 1% deviance from the golden ratio.““Greek historian Herodotus, who supposedly wrote that the Pyramid's dimensions were chosen so the area of a square of length equal to the height equaled the area of a face triangle, thus implying that the ratio of slant height to half the base is exactly phi (Proof!). Yet, a literal translation of the original Greek shows that Herodotus did not make that claim (Markowski 7). Also, Herodotus wrote roughly two millennia after the Pyramid was built, so his insight into the minds of the original builders must be questioned. Also, the ancient Egyptians had no concept of irrational numbers, and so could not have centered the design around phi (Dudley).” Mathematically, the ratio between the height and the side creates a ratio close the the golden ratio. Knowing what the creators of the Great Pyramid was thinking when they built the pyramid is unknown and assuming they used the golden ratio would be a huge …show more content…

The dimensions of the Parthenon vary due to measuring from and to different point. So, someone looking for the Golden Ratio can choose whichever numbers yield them the closest results. Usually to have the ratio closest to the golden ratio, people use two out of the four steps in the rectangle. The reasoning behind only some steps being used is a logical question, which has no answer. The dimensions of the building 228 ft. long X 101 ft. wide, X 45 ft. high. The height can also be 59 ft. if the steps are included in the measurement. Either way the ratios come to 2.25 or 1.71 respectively. Both ratios are out or the 5% accepted range of 1.58 to 1.66. It seems that the golden ratio isn’t even found in the Parthenon. The Mona Lisa is said to have a golden ratio face, but there is no proof Da Vinci ever used the golden ratio consciously in his painting. Since we have no knowledge of Da Vinci using the Golden Rectangle, we can only infer which points we use to draw the

More about Phidias Golden Ratio

Open Document