Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on personality tests
Theories of personality test
Essay about personality testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on personality tests
According to the Emotional Assessment/Personality Test, what are your greatest personality strengths? Describe in detail how you have utilized (or plan to utilize) these strengths in your life. - Extraversion (Sociability and Assertiveness): Previous personality tests have always told me that I am more of an Extrovert than an Introvert. I have always considered myself a very social person and one to meet new people. I wouldn 't’t say “I’m the life of the party,” but I do like to mingle with people I haven’t met. I will say, I’m a bit surprised about the Assertiveness. I have been working on this very aspect in my counseling now. In previous experiences, whether it was job or school, I have always been a social butterfly. I feel that’s why …show more content…
When I take on more responsibility, it’s because I have a supervisor or manager telling me what they see I’m capable of. I then look at the big picture before taking it on as well talking it out with him/her. I am very able to put my frustrations to the side. I have more patience than most people my age do. (Trust me, it’s taken years of therapy to get that back.) In my personal experiences, I’m not a risk taker too much either. I think of everything that could go wrong most of the time, instead of what could actually go right. Having this mentality also extends into the workforce. I’m considered a 5 in both areas. One thing the test mentioned, which I happen to agree with, is that “excessive fear can be an unnecessary obstacle to enjoyment.” I often think of a previous job, which I was a liaison for the company, if I would have stuck it out until the very end of their last contract date. Although the company lost the contract while I was there, I feel if I would have had more training by the manager who put me in the role, I would have enjoyed it. Unfortunately, they moved her to a different department and she was unable to continue training me. With proper training, I could be that risk taker I hope to be one day (and push others need to be as …show more content…
(Paloino, Baron Gomis & Ruiz Amaya, 2011). While studying, especially online, you must discipline yourself to learn the material and do your homework, but with acquiring that discipline, you are able to discipline yourself in the workforce. It helps having that extra benefit in the workforce. A couple other potential benefits are having leaders to transform the company and people who take initiative. In the article, “Probing the Dark Side of Employees’ Strengths,” once they hire, train and are sent to work, they are able to “make powerful, positive contributions that can drive the business forward.” (Probing the Dark Side of Employees’ Strengths, 2007. Pg. 1) Supervisors and managers are able to find and see the talents and experiences that employees bring with them and hire them into the correct department for that individual to
The Myers and Briggs Analysis is a series of questions that when answered are examined and grouped together in order to determine the personalities of those taking this test. This particular test can result in sixteen different outcomes or types of personalities, which is determined by four different categories that judge if you are introverted or extroverted, use your senses or your intuition, your choice to think or use your feelings, and finally if you are judgmental or perceptive. These series of questions are designed to judge our personalities and help us to determine which career pathways we will be most suited for based on our personality traits and abilities to work well with others, which is important for our future decisions.
Two strengths appeared when reviewing the emotional intelligence (EQ) assessment. The first, is my high self-awareness. This is a great asset of mine because I am able to recognize when I need to separate myself from the group in order to rejuvenate myself. Spending a significant about of time around one group of
My extroverted personality has always been my signature trait since birth; it thrives best when I'm around others. I switched roles as "the teacher's pet" and "the class clown" often, competing for the highest grade while being the go-to guy for a good laugh. While the spotlight continued
Utility of assessment. Why are these types of personality assessments useful? Did you find the results useful? Why or why not?
My score on extraversion was 22, low again compared to the norm. For this trait, I agreed with my results at first, but after some thinking I realized although I am introverted, I do behave extravertly sometimes. In general, I prefer working alone, staying indoors, and I don’t like being around a lot of people. For example, when given a group project, I’d prefer working on my own. Yet most of the time, I end up being the group leader because I get along well with people and am usually optimistic. Basically, I prefer settings with less people, but I can mingle well with strangers at parties or functions. Most of my friends and myself included, would say I am extraverted because I make friends easily and am usually very happy and cheerful. But that is only partially true because I do behave differently depending on the situation and my role as a friend, student, employee, etc. Therefore, I don’t agree with my results overall. Considering I show both introversion and extroversion, I think my results should have been within average compared to the
There has yet to be any determining evidence defines the characteristics of extraversion. The experimenters in this particular experiment have hypothesized that the facets of extraversion are somehow linked by reward sensitivity. This hypothesis was also tested against a model in which they are linked by sociability. There has been much work on this topic in the past, beginning with the works of Jung and James in the early 20th century—to the work of Watson and Clark in 1997. And even after a century of study, they are still unable to truly define the characteristics of the extraversion dimension of personality. In the many attempts to define extraversion, Watson and Clark have defined six basic facets of the personality trait. These are: venturesome, affiliation, positive affectivity, energy, ascendance, and ambition. Researchers Depue and Collins, in 1999, also offered a more succinct depiction of the characteristics of extraversion, this only having three basic parts. The first being affiliation, the enjoyment and value of close interpersonal bonds, also being warm and affectionate. The second, agency, being socially dominant, enjoying leadership roles, being assertive and exhibitionistic, and having a sense of potency in accomplishing goals. The final facet being impuslivity, but this one has been argued upon whether it should be included at all in the characteristics of extraversion at all.
In terms of The Big Five Trait Theory, an individual with a high level of extraversion is thought to display dominant behaviour as well as good leadership skills. The individual focusses their psychic energy on things that are external...
Extraverts have an energy that is outwards towards people and things (Changing Minds, 2002-2011). They get their motivation from others, need a lot of stimulation, and express their motions (Changing Minds, 2002-2011). Rather than thinking of changing the world they want to change it (Changing Minds, 2002-2011). They have an attitude that is often relaxed and confident and they are understandable and accessible (Changing Minds, 2002-2011). Before thinking they act and like to communicate openly (Changing Minds, 2002-2011). They show energy and enthusiasm (Changing Minds, 2002-2011). They are often seen as shallow and pushy by introverts (Changing Minds, 2002-2011). After reading the first scenario of Joh...
I found the results of my self-assessments to be a very insightful and accurate description of myself. The results of the learning styles test and the Keirsey Temperament Sorter II are very valuable for examining my personality traits and learning style and making improvements as needed.
Extraversion is marked by pronounced engagement with the external world. Extraverts enjoy eing with people, are full of energy, and often experience positive emotions. They tend to be enthusiastic, action-oriented, individuals who are likely to say "Yes!" or "Let's go!" to opportunities for excitement. In groups they like to talk, assert themselves, and draw attention to themselves. (Beaumont 2003)
Personality tests tell a person a lot about why a person is who they have become. I believe that these test if taken truthfully can identify deficiencies that individuals can work on to benefit not only themselves but others in the organizations that they work in. Some models state that it is in human nature and chemicals that decided how a person acts but I believe it is based on life experiences and a personality can change as long as a person knows the deficiencies and works to change them.
One of the assessments revealed that I am too task oriented and I tend to focus less on the concerns of people. I can enhance my leadership skills by gaining a balance with people and my tasks. Overall I have strong charismatic leader behaviors which accounts for building trust with my employees. Being trustworthy is a core value of being a successful leader and team player.
Trait approach covers the big five personality traits: extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience. These five traits have been identified as the most identifiable personality traits, even across cultures and societies. According to McCrae, Costa, and Busch’s (1986) study on personality system comprehensiveness, the big five personality model included the five traits most identified with by individuals asked to describe themselves and others. I found this segment of the class especially intriguing as it helped me not only learn so much about myself, but also take a deeper look into the personality of my family, peers, and even strangers. I am also more conscious of how I self-monitor my personality traits. For example, I am very much so an introverted person but at times I try to be extroverted based off the environment. In highly social environments, I consciously smile and try to talk to people because I want to be perceived in a favorable light, not actually because I feel the need to be sociable. In other words, I don’t want to be perceived as odd. I believe I developed this form of self-monitoring because when I am introverted at social events people will constantly ask me if I’m ok since I’m quiet, which makes me uncomfortable as they make me the focus. Being the center of attention makes me anxious, and therefore to prevent that I have developed being a fake-extrovert to avoid it. This exemplified how I apply self-monitoring to my everyday life. Trait approach gave me insight into how to identify vastly accepted personality traits, as well as, how each of these traits can be influenced and
Taking any type of personality test can lead to a lot of thought and reflection on yourself,
I learned that having these personality traits affects my behavior at work and in my relationships. I find that I have strengths and weaknesses with these personality traits. I find it is difficult at times being an introvert. I wish I could have an extrovert personality at times. This could help in my relationships at work.