Perks Of Being A Wallflower Book Vs Movie Essay

1632 Words4 Pages

Why is it that some movies fail to create a ``faithful adaptation of books? The same question can be asked for the book and the movie of The Perks of Being a Wallflower, written and directed by Stephen Chbosky. The book was a New York times bestseller and USA today calls it, “a coming-of-age tale.” The movie was nominated for Best Motion Picture, Best Actor in a Leading Role, and Best Adapted Screenplay. As the book was adapted for the movie, and despite being directed be the same person that wrote the book, there were changes that were made to the story of the movie. Three differences between the book and the movies that negatively affected the story was the lack of Helen’s backstory, the removal if Charlie’s smoking addiction, and the near removal of “Bill” because it reduces the character development of key characters.
In both the book and movie, the story revolves around a boy named Charlie and his first two years of high school after the suicide of his best friend. Charlie starts out as a loner in high school, but he then meets Patrick and his step-sister Sam at a football game. …show more content…

Helen’s backstory being removed negative affects the story because it removes a key character to the development of the plot and to the character development of Charlie. The removal of Charlie’s addiction negatively affected the story by harming the character development of Charlie and it weakens the theme that the book is conveying. The last change that negatively affects the story is “Bill” is not important in the movie. This change negatively affects the movie because it once again weakens Charlie’s character development by subtracting one more character for him to interact with and it creates missed opportunities for the story to develop him as a character. The removal of “Bill” also causes some of the events from the book to become non-existent and impossible in the

Open Document