Peace Without Victory Analysis

838 Words2 Pages

At the end of World War I, the United States had not achieved their initial objective of making the world safe for democracy and was not able to prevent a war this great from happening again. The end of the war was handled poorly with a peace conference that excluded over half of the nations involved in the fighting, a treaty that demanded too much from war torn Germany, and unsettled disagreements across all boards. President Wilson’s fourteen points, a list of post war reparations that were all but ignored at the peace conference, were dependent on a “Peace without Victory” ending to the war which is exactly the opposite of what actually happened. America’s goals set in place before their introduction into the war were not met because of mistakes that were made at the conclusion of the war. The Paris Peace Conference was the setting for a myriad of mistakes that later on became one of the main causes of World War II. The idea of a “Peace without Victory” was basically thrown out the window. Great Britain, France, Italy, and the United …show more content…

The League of Nations was an international organization that was meant to oversea world affairs and prevent future wars and the only way it was going to work is if the U.S. joins. Wilson had fought hard for the League, as it was of his own creation, and had finally convinced the Allies to join the group, but his downfall met him when he returned home. The U.S. Senate wanted to keep American isolationism alive and to do that, they had to remove themselves from world affairs. Wilson was devastated but not deterred at this decision as he planned to tour America to gain the people’s support to join the League of Nations, but soon after he began his journey he befell ill, unable to rally anymore basically ending the fight right there. With the United States out of the picture, the League of Nations was unable to survive for

Open Document