Paul Hindemith’s Change in Style and Culmination in Mathis der Maler

1299 Words3 Pages

Paul Hindemith set out to anchor a new movement towards 'unnatural' music, while Germany lacked composers of New Music, to attempt to bring structure and pedagogy to the creation of an otherwise unstructured and unteachable new musical art form. Being in exile from Germany due to his unconventional and unappreciated (by the Nazi party primarily) work, he sought refuge in the United States to pursue and be faithful to his art. He discovered that theory constants were truly undefinable, however the process of trying to find them opened his mind increasingly inwardly.1 Hindemith’s ideas permeate his musical creations and his chronology of works represent a timeline of their changes. The first of three movements, “Angelic Concert”, in his Mathis der Maler symphony preceding his opera, is an example of how his theoretical processes ultimately came together into a solidified and understandable practice.

As a teacher, Hindemith held many ideas about the future of New Music, and wanted to change the way music theory was studied and taught. He wanted to teach chordal harmony and progressions in the reverse of what was considered logical, as described by Humphrey Searle, “The problem which Hindemith attempts to solve . . . is that of the free use of all the twelve tones of the chromatic scale within a tonal framework.”1 In popular theory, chromatic notes were seen as alterations or decoration around a strict scale and chordal progression. Hindemith “ … has, through his system of tonal relationship based on vibrations, liberated those notes which have no place in the diatonic scale from their subservient position as passing notes . . . The result of this arrangement, he claims, is that it frees the composer from “the tyranny of the maj...

... middle of paper ...

...mposer who thrived on clarity, concision, and linear energy rather than on the late romantics’ diffuse forms, exaggerated emotion, and tortured harmonic logic. … for Hindemith the object was always synthesis, reconciliation of past and present.” 12

Works Cited

1 Geoffrey Skelton, Paul Hindemith (London: Victor Gollancz, 1975), 143

2 Geoffrey Skelton, Paul Hindemith (London: Victor Gollancz, 1975), 146

3 David Neumeyer, The Music of Paul Hindemith (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986), 23

4 Ibid, 35

5 Ibid, 23

6 Colin Mason, ed., Oxford Studies of Composers (London: Oxford

University Press, 1970), vol. 6, Hindemith, by Ian Kemp, 39

7 David Neumeyer, The Music of Paul Hindemith, 30

8 Ian Kemp, Hindemith, 48

9 David Neumeyer, The Music of Paul Hindemith, 15

10 Ian Kemp, Hindemith, 7

11 Ibid, 39

12 David Neumeyer, The Music of Paul Hindemith, 3

Open Document