With all of my respect mister Patrick Henry I disagree with you, how could we know that they are willing to attack only because they settle on the shore? Maybe they have a problem so they need to stop nearby. However, you should not be sure that everyone will support you, everyone has his own point of view. In such a situation, there are a lot of people who are against the idea of "give me liberty or give me death". For me I think that no one in the world would ask for war, everyone wants to live in peace without being oppressed or enslaved. Moreover, you should send someone to investigate what they are planning to, instead of asking to send everyone to war. Moreover, you should know that there will be a lot of consequence of war, you will be responsible for thousands of people who will die in such a big war against a great navy that the British have. …show more content…
Besides, how could you make all the population agree with your idea of die instead of being enslaved? For me you such a Coward, there are some people who want to live and make as much as possible to live and survive even if there is no hope. At the end of my speech I want to ask you a questions mister Patrick Henry, do you really think that the British would attack its colonies? Especially that we didn't do anything. Why you don't say that the British knew that we are in danger and they are coming to support and protect us from the danger of the invaders who want really to enslave us not the
...no loyalty to the Crown now, in future conflicts, the colonists may turn against us and become our enemy. Radical action must be taken in order to regulate their behavior. They must recognize the royal authority.
The 1770s proved to be a time of much chaos and debate. The thirteen colonies, which soon gained their independence, were in the midst of a conflict with Great Britain. The colonies were suffering from repeated injuries and usurpations inflicted upon them by the British. As a result of these inflictions, Thomas Paine and Patrick Henry addressed these injustices, and proved to be very persuasive through providing reasoning and evidence that moved many colonists to believe that to reach contentment and peace the colonies had to rid themselves of British rule. Henry and Paine were successful in swaying their audience, not only because of the rhetorical strategies used, but also because they were passionate about the cause they were committed to.
At the Virginia convention in 1775 Patrick Henry spoke out anonymously about standing up to the British monarchy and gaining independence. His simple use of language and emotionally captivating passages inspired many to fight for a republic. Persuading the devout and loyal colonies to pull away from their mother country took courage.
Patrick Henry was known as “the Orator of Liberty” and created his name with his speeches. When colonists were divided in 1775, some were hoping to work it out but not Patrick Henry. He thought the only choice was to go to war with Great Britain. Henry uses ethos, pathos, and logos to show his clause for going to war with Britain.
There are few speeches in the American history that compel us towards great acts of patriotism. Patrick Henry's speech in the Virginia Provincial Convention of 1775 is a prime example of one of these great speeches. During the debates on whether or not to compromise with Great Britain, Patrick Henry proposed the idea to his fellow members of the First Continental Congress to declare war on Great Britain. A reason why the speech was so powerful was the rhetorical strategies of the diction of slavery, the appeal to God, and the appeal to logic, that he deftly employed.
He addressed the cruel taxes and policies that have been placed upon the American people. He also, speaks of the tiring efforts of the colonies to overcome the impossible British policies. Henry begins his statement with the numerous actions taken by people in response to the British approach to limit their freedom. Writing in the statement, Henry complains that many actions have been taken in an effort to achieve freedom but have failed. Henry himself writes, “In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation?”. In making this comment Henry urges the British to be prepared for them. After overcoming the stamp act , Henry urges the British to be ready for revolution if freedom is not given. This exactly, Henry points out, if basic privileges are not given to men and women, there will be a war. Henry himself writes. “give me liberty, or give me death!”. Basically, Henry is warning that if freedom is not given, he is willing to fight until it is. Patrick Henry’s statement is crucial to the American cause in the War for Independence. He led the fight against the stamp act, after being elected to the Virginia House of Burgesses in 1765. Also, he proposed his argument for going to war was in an effort to live as free men and fight. His speech inspired men to join the cause and fight for
Patrick Henry’s statements resonates with the colonists because it adequately captures their grievances and feelings against the British, who have made their lives exceedingly difficult. Unlike many Demagogues who use their words to gain personal power or control, Patrick Henry uses his words to rally the colonists towards a good common cause that ultimately leads to the creation of the strongest nation in the world. The power, conviction and language of Henry’s speech lead to a revolution that would go n to change the course of
Although Henry refused to serve on the Constitutional Convention, Madison needed Henry's persuasive ways. Henry had a way to make people agree with his ideas. Even though Henry didn't serve on the Constitutional Convention, he was still present to put in his word. As soon as the meetings opened, Henry began to argue against the Constitution. This argument went on for three weeks. Henry was aware that the new government had to be strong, but felt that the Constitution made the central government too powerful. He thought that the power should lay in the hands of the states. "What right had they [the group that wrote the Constitution] to say 'We the people,' instead We, the States?" he demanded.
In the “Speech at the Virginia Convention” Patrick Henry tries to persuade colonists to fight a war against the English; he uses several main rhetorical strategies such as; parallelism, metaphor, and rhetorical questions.
Patrick Henry’s effective diction emphasizes how much the British had suppressed the colonists and that it was time to fight for their freedom. Henry displays this through his strong use of pathos, logos, and ethos. His rhetorical questions really appeal to the logic and ethics of the colonists and leaves the no choice but to join him and rebel.
Of course the British have not only engaged in the violation of the rights of “neutral vessels” which they “…would be so prompt to avenge if committed against herself” but also “…of violating the rights and peace of our coasts.” (26) Madison contends that the British are enforcing a “pretended blockade” because the British do not have an adequate force present or the “practicability of applying one”. Madi...
Throughout the speech Patrick Henry uses parallelism to acquire the support from the Americans to join the war effort. He believes that they have done the best of their ability to prevent the war and explains that "We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne." He uses this to describe the effort that was used to prevent the war, but which in the end failed. He says that “there is no longer any room for hope” and truly believes that America has done all it could to be in peace with the British. He proceeded to say that “Our petitions have been slighted; our
He gains their trust and respect, while appealing to their emotions to unite in their decision to fight for their freedom from the British. Through ethos and pathos appeals, Henry’s persuasive speech delivers his strong feelings toward the country and his fellow men. Henry’s speech is relevant even today and encouraging to anyone willing to stand up for what they believe in and fight for their
We fight a couple of battles which would determine the outcome of this country? No, this will either be a very short battle showing America that England is superior, or a very long and strenuous war which will put most “Patriotic American’s” into the hands of England or dead. In order to have even the slightest chance of winning they would need the whole country behind them all the way through. Without this there is no army to fight and therefore very little resistance for England. I say that these “Patriots” should calm down and help to befriend England and give what they ask without question. If they want to show their authority over us then let them, what can happen to a country who obeys the rules of his authority? Nothing, it give us room to breathe, eat, and be happy; and for them to feel at ease with us and have no
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal”(paragraph 2). Oh how these words so plain and simple, could start such a revolution. A revolution against one of the greatest military mights of our time. But why? Why would we stand up to Great Britain? Because we can no longer lay down as our oppressors beat and whip our brothers. Doing the right may not always be easy, but it still needs to be done. Often it is the oppressed to carry out justice to the unjust. We must be the liberators of the weak and lonely. But how could we do this great good if we do not liberate ourselves? Let us rebel!