Othering In Benito Cereno

1059 Words3 Pages

Otherness is commonly a force of causing an individual to be separated from a majority group and, therefore, treated differently. The separation from the group has a large enough effect to cause otherness to be a major characterization of slaves in literature. Othering as a characterization normally denotes disempowerment, discrimination, and judgment. Yet, the story of Benito Cereno, where a whaling ship captain named Delano ends up finding and helping a merchant ship quell a slave rebellion, defies these conventions. Babo, the slave that starts the rebellion, highlights the subtle paradoxical nature of others leading to a reversal of the expected othering process. Before Looking at specific passage, a few terms need to be clarified. Two …show more content…

First, Babo attempts to avoid othering through inclusion. However, Babo is more likely to be treated differently and individuals are more likely to focus on his othering qualities the more Babo tries to blend into the group. This particularly stands out when Delano offers to buy Babo even though he has already expressed that “such a friend; slave I cannot call [Babo]” and “[Babo] seems…a sort of privy councilor” inferring inclusion in the group, friends (Melville pg. 47, 57). Yet, immediately after referencing this he point out Babo’s “Animal humor” and later Delano says, “I should like to have your man here myself—what will you take for him,” othering Babo by focusing on his servitude as well as relating him to an animal (Melville pg. 57, 61). Delano goes further when he thinks, “could then Don Benito be any way in complicity with the blacks”, again referring to a very inclusive position in the group before saying, “but [blacks] are too stupid” (Melville pg. 65). It is almost ironic that the more connected to Benito and the ship’s group Babo tries to appear, the more othered he becomes to Delano. This is also true for the narrator who uses words such as “black”, “Negro”, and “fox” throughout this section of the book (Melville pg. 65). Coming together, Babo’s attempts to be included in the group forms a paradox of inclusion leading to an increase in …show more content…

Right after Babo’s execution, when Delano is looking at Babo’s severed head, the story reflects, “[Babo’s] head, that hive of subtlety…met, unabashed, the gazes of whites” (Melville pg. 104). Here despite being recognized as “not human”, “black”, and other, Babo is on the same level as the whites (Melville pg. 103). He can literally look them in the eye “unabashed”, without any feelings of separation or wrong. He is seen as being intelligent enough to be recognized as such by the whites. In addition, the third person narrator has an open literacy where the sentiments of the narrator reflect Delano’s thoughts. In accordance, the description has Delano beginning to see the more human, inclusive qualities of Babo. The narrator goes further; he makes Babo surpass the white group and human ability fully. He is able to see “towards St. Bartholomew’s church, in whose vaults…and across the Rimac bridge looked towards the monastery, on Mount Agonia” (Melville pg. 104). It makes Babo seem almost clairvoyant. He is able to see great distances across streets, rivers, and mountains despite being dead. The structure of the third person narrator also blurs the lines between Babo’s sight and the narrator’s comments. Though there is a break signified by a comma between what Babo sees and

Open Document