Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why women need abortion rights essay
Introduction to abortion debate
Why women need abortion rights essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why women need abortion rights essay
In Opposing Viewpoints: The Third World, Laura Egendorf provides opposing opinions on the problems facing third world countries, how Third World development can be achieved, the ability for Third World countries to form lasting democracies, and finally what the First World countries role is in the development of the Third World countries. Egendorf concludes that the importance or even existence of overpopulation, production and construction restrictions, poverty, women’s sexual freedom and AIDS is debatable. Concerning Third World development Egendorf discusses the positive and negative effects of free market policies, debt relief or cancellation, and The World Bank. In regards to the Third World’s ability to form lasting democracies Egendorf …show more content…
Many disagree on the problems they are facing and the solution. In this particular book the topics of overpopulation, restrictions on production and consumption, women’s sexual freedom and AIDS are discussed. Valid arguments are presented on both sides of all arguments. For example in regards to overpopulation, “Roy W. Brown asserts that population growth in developing countries could lead to increased levels of poverty and starvation and thwart further development. On the other hand Peter T. Bauer asserts that, “population increases in less-developed countries … often lead[s] to economic growth.” In the next chapter of the book Egendorf tackles the problem of how can Third World countries development be achieved? She starts by discussing the pros and cons of free-market policies then goes on to debt relief and cancellation and finally the effectiveness of the World Bank’s development programs. Much like in chapter one all arguments have sustainable amounts of …show more content…
For example in regards to the ability for democracy to succeed in Africa, “The Economist … asserts that democracy in Africa has been unsuccessful because elections have largely failed to produce a change in democracy” whereas, “ the 1999 elections in Nigeria and South Africa indicate that democracy can be sustained in Africa.” Finally in chapter four Egendorf contemplates the First World nations role in Third World countries. The topics of U.S. foreign aid, U.S.’s role in Africa and the United Nations’ role in third world countries. In regard to U.S. foreign aid, “J. Brian Atwood … argues that foreign aid has helped finance medical and agricultural advances that have led to decreased child mortality and greater crop yields.” On the other hand, “L. Jacobo Rodriguez … argues that, despite the claims of some foreign aid proponents. The postwar economic growth of Europe and Asia was not a result of U.S financial assistance.” Throughout the book Egendorf discusses many highly debatable topics regarding Third World countries and shows substantial evidence to prove both sides of each
Developed countries should not simply hand money to third world countries, as this gives no incentive to develop responsible government or fiscal policies. Dambisa Moyo, an international economist from Zambia, comments on foreign aid, stating that “aid is easy money” (Collier). If a person were to give a man in need a small sum of m...
The United States is one of the leading suppliers of Foreign Aid in the world, and even though the US gives billions, European countries give aid money to the same countries, this causes many areas of the Middle East, Africa, and Asia to be almost fully dependent on foreign aid. This means that without aid from other countries, they would not be able to support themselves at all. Foreign aid is meant to help countries that are struggling with civil unrest, disease, or natural disasters, it is not meant to help keep the country out of debt, but that is where more and more of the US and The EU’s foreign aid budget is going. The question is, does all this money actually go where it is intended? It should be going towards the government and to help the people, but in many cases, the countries government does not have the resources to properly track the flow of money. The countries in most cases have poor infrastructure and corrupt or oppressive leaders, not always at a national level, but in the towns and cities. So this means there is almost no way to oversee the flow of foreign aid through the country, all we can see is that their situations aren't getting any better and the countries are still impoverished. If this is the case, where are the millions of dollars going? Countries like Afghanistan and Iraq receive the most money from American foreign aid and European aid, yet they are still under oppressive governmental rule and there is still an extreme difference between the rich and poor. Garrett Harding’s theory of “Lifeboat Ethics” exemplifies how not giving aid to others will allow the strongest of society to thrive, while teaching the impoverished to help themselves. He believes that giving aid to poor countries will only make ...
The United States Agency for International Development (US AID) was established in the 1960s by an executive order issued by President Kennedy (US AID, 2014). The agency combines development assistance with the promotion of foreign policy to advance US interests abroad (US AID, 2014). In other words – and as noted on its website – US AID “reflects both the American people's compassion and support of human dignity as well as advances U.S. foreign policy interests” (US AID, 2014).
This essay will argue that the current British policy of trying to meet the target of spending 0.7% of British Gross National Income on foreign aid is flawed. It will be split into three sections: the first will establish that foreign aid is an important and contentious area of policy, the second will show the problems of the 0.7% target whilst the final one will propose solutions to the problems inherent in current policy choices in the area. The main conclusion of the essay will be that, if the United Kingdom is committed to delivering effective foreign aid, it ought to stop considering whether it has spent enough on developing countries but instead focus on whether its expenditure is having effect. Throughout, discussion will be made harder by the fact that current academic commentary on foreign aid ‘anarchy’. Considering this, the essay will try to illustrate as broad a range as possible in the various approaches taken to the topic, before reaching its overall conclusion.
To understand the developing countries and their aim of identification, it can be mentioned that “The great battleground for the defense and expansion of freedom today is the whole southern half of the globe, the lands of the rising peoples. Their revolution is the greatest in human history. They seek an end to injustice, tyranny and exploitation. More than an end, they seek a beginning” John F. Kennedy 1961. The south or third world countries are; “group of countries which have colonial histories and which are in the process of developing economically and socially from a status characterized by low incomes , dependence on agriculture, weakness in trading relations, social deprivation for large segments of society, and restricted political and civil liberties” (Smith, 1996, p:1). Nevertheless, third world countries can be considered the developing countries regarding the influences and affects that have been made to them and their nation by the greater power that they were ruled by.
Smith, R.K. (1996). Understanding third world politics: theories of political change and development. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
The first stage is a period with both high fertility and high mortality rates. Observations taken from demography show that underdeveloped or `Third World' nations have extremely high birth and death rates. Many households cannot have the number of surviving children they desire due to high mortality rates and less than favorable health conditions that affect natural fertility. In order to maintain their populations under high mortality conditions, these nations have cultures that promote fertility. Life chances decrease with an increased population, which leads to various social problems such as: hunger, malnutrition, starvation, ill health, preventable disease, high infant mortality, and low life expectancy. Third world nations have small economies, little...
Mac Pherson, Stewart. Social Policy in the Third World: The Social Dilemmas of Underdevelopment. UK: Wheatsheaf Books Ltd. 1982.
Most people have heard the terms “developed countries”, as well as “undeveloped countries”. Developed countries can be defined as countries with high advanced technological functions and a matured economy. While developed countries are seen as “rich” and “state-of-the-art” , undeveloped countries are quite the opposite. They are the poorer states and are often called the third world countries. But what really causes these countries to be poor and undeveloped? And how can they become like the developed countries? There are many reasons why countries are undeveloped but the main factors are the country’s natural disasters, poverty, lack of education , and selfish governments who may not be transparent in handling money.
The developing world faces unprecedented amounts of pressure on issues such as economic development, poverty, inadequate sanitation and today more than ever, population crises. According to the Eager’s theory of demographic transition, there are three fundamental stages in development. Stage one has high death rates and high fertility rates. Stage two comprises of a decrease in death rates due to better medical treatment and continued high fertility rates (this means high population growth rates). Stage three is in the long-run and consists of a decrease in fertility rates which are accompanied by industrialization. Most developing countries are in the second stage. This has magnificently increased an insurmountable amount of pressure on governments, especially in the provision of education, health care and food security, and the government’s ability to raise standards of living.
When seeing both sides of the argument if whether or not foreign aid is beneficial for African countries, we can see strong and weak parts. In the case of seeing the advantages of foreign aid we can some what see that giving more money to devolving nation leads to dependency and causing problem mainly corruption. Same goes for Easterly that he should also realize that more money in fact may help the poor and escape poverty trap. Overall, aid coming through in any forms foreign aid lenders should mandate reform and requirements to take out loans. Finally, nation’s government should be hold check and balances and accountability so that the aid is dispersed to countries needs.
Foreign aid can encourage countries to adopt positive political and economic policies if that is its principal objective. But it may, on the contrary, undermine development if it is given to countries that are unlikely or unwilling to make necessary political, economic and governance reforms. Since there are some different thoughts on foreign aids, critics of aid such as Peter Bauer have argued that aid is never necessary. For example, “Foreign aid is a central component of world development”. So in 1981, said Professor Hollis Chenery, then Vice President of World Bank in charge of economic research, how can he have been right? Large scale development occurs in many places with...
... one relating to the distribution of resources between and within countries. First-World, has the ability to provide amount of resources, is rarely considered overpopulated. In this sense, the problem of overpopulation boils down to the problem of poverty as it is to poverty itself. To solve the overpopulation, the first solution is that of overpopulation is indeed a problem, family planning/contraception is only one way of constructing a solution, it is a solution that does not threaten the vested interests of the elite. Another solution is the empowerment of women in Third-World countries because they are forced to bear many babies. However, when she has formal education and jobs outside of home, she becomes financially dependent on her husband and is able to speak her own mind. In this regard, Third-World countries should effort to educate and empower women.
The First World is said to be the industrialised, capitalist countries of Western Europe, North America, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand who are developed (as explained in the definition). The Third World includes the developing countries of Asia, Africa and Latin America who are still in the mode of developing. Normally we understand the situation of underdevelopment is because the third world was under the colonies or the colonial rule for a certain period of time and lags behind the first world in every aspect like- social, economical, political, technological advancements which are yet to be seen in the third world fully like the first world. In this paper we will talk about various theorists from Karl Marx (capitalism and class conflict), Kay and Amin (merchant capitalism, colonialism and neo-colonialism), Vladimir Lenin (imperialism), Andre Gunder Frank (third world dependency), Lipton (urban bias) and dependency theory.
Foreign aid is a voluntary transmission of resources from one country to another. Foreign aid can be divided into military aid and economic assistance. Most of the countries encourage foreign aid as it can help third world countries and save lives. This sort of aid can bring relief and ameliorate suffering, not just in the short term but also in the long run. (Nairobi 2010) It is not only strong countries that can provide aid, some of the private organizations can also take the initiative to participate in it. Although some of the politicians say that foreign aid is just a waste of funds, foreign aid should be encouraged because it saves lives, improves both donors and recipients’ economic growth and provides security to poor countries.