1 - We live in a post-truth world; real truth has become unimportant or irrelevant. Social media has become the trusted news source. We live in a digital age where there is so much information around us, so many differing views of what is true. It is hard for some to determine truth, often confused rather than informed.
2 – Truth does exist, it does matter, and it can be recognized. It won’t come to us all at once… line upon line, precept upon precept. BYU Provo’s mission statement, “the gospel encourages the pursuit of all truth.”
3 – D&C 93, the Lord declared, “truth is knowledge of things as they are, and as they were, and as they are to come.” Truth is not dependent on popular opinion or based on the opinion of experts. Brigham Young
…show more content…
D&C 88:118, we must “seek learning by study and also by faith.” As BYU-I student, we will develop the skills to discern and find truth in the subjects we study.
5 – Alma has said, “Faith is not to have a perfect knowledge of things but instead is a hope for things which are not seen which are true.” Faith is a God-given way of discerning truth before we have perfect knowledge of the matter. Dallin H. Oaks observed, “Revelation occurs when a scientist, inventor, artist, or great leader receives flashes of enlightenment from a loving God for the benefit of His children.” Faith is a lesser known means of discerning truth and in the long a more reliable method.
6 – Spencer W. Kimball said, “Perspiration must precede inspiration; there must be effort before there is excellence.” We must study and pray and follow the guidance of the Holy Ghost. Often it’s not easy and we may not master the process during our lifetime here on earth. Challenges will come and we will have
…show more content…
A statement may be accurately reported but still be untrue because it has been taken out of context. c) Be patient with yourself and the process. Understand and remember that one purpose of our mortal life is to learn to operate by faith, to discern truth without perfect knowledge. d) If you want to understand truth, draw closer to Him who is the source of all truth and light.
8 – In conclusion, Pres. Joseph Fielding Smith once observed, “The greatest truth [is]… that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, the Redeemer of the world, who came into this world to die that men might live… It is far more important to know that… than it is to know all that can be obtained in secular education.” If we focus on Him during our pursuit of truth, we will be blessed in our endeavors in all things, in all places, at all times.
Sources Cited
1. Oxford Dictionary, “Oxford Dictionaries Word of the Year 2016 Is … Post-Truth,” Press and News, 16 November 2016, oxforddictionaries.com/press/news/2016/12/11/WOTY-16.
2. Teachings of the Presidents of the Church: Brigham Young (Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1997),
If as believers we fail to completely trust the Word of God and form our life under its direction then our witness will become misleading and even confusing. Believer’s effort in diligently understanding, applying and holding full trust to the word of God in all aspects of our life will be instrumental in building our faith. Such a faith will elevate us to enable us rise above the unrelenting wave of our culture’s non-biblical ideologies. Biblical worldview is very important in order to develop a life, which can be emulated by others in diligence, integrity and honesty in the modern society (Tackett, 2014).
that will allow a person to find order in their truth. Through such truth and
obtain true knowledge without faith. you must have faith in God, who is the essence of
President Hinckley asked and answered a question in General Conference on October 4th of 1997. "Are we moving to mainstream America as some observers believe? In this, I fear we are." The comment came due to the increasing amount of shopping that is being done on sundays in LDS communities, and the increasing amount of disobedience to the Word of Wisdom. His tone was one of concern and love.
“Truth is information which has been clearly proved, or affirmed, or verified… standing firm no matter whether it yields returns or not,” Václav Havel states on his views of truth. Part of faith is trusting in God and standing firm in the faith and church, yet learning about what you affirm when talking about faith. The truth of faith can be confusing and hard to understand in varying points of the Christian faith. Typically, these confusions occur when the truth of faith does not line up with events, actions, or thoughts about what you wanted to believe the nature of the truth of faith is. My belief paper talked about how its hard to always trust that God is there in the hard times as the path you are going on isn’t always what you want, but by relying on God, things can turn around. By trusting in God, the path becomes present. In order to trust in God, one must have a foundation in full faith in the church, trinity, and sacraments.
...e Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, 30 May 2008. Web. 12 Feb. 2012.
To have a desire to know truth you have to be willing to work, read, ponder or meditate, and have sincere prayer. We have to be willing to take those words that we have ponderized and act upon them. This type of studying takes time and patients. This is not something we do for a few minutes just to say we read for today. Tanner says (p.497-498) “We are to learn spiritual truth by heart and then retain in remembrance what we have placed deep in our hearts.” Retaining a remembrance means we should be ready to use, display, and act on the knowledge that we have. Which means you take the things that you have read and study them all day. As I have read these two essays I have come to a greater understanding of what to do with the truth that I have. I should not take for granted the words of God. That just reading a verse or two does not constitute a desire to know truth nor is it deepening my understanding of gospel learning. I must ensure this desire of Spiritual learning does not fall by the waste side that I have a true desire to learn truth. Whichever method is used we can be sure that our desire to know the truth will put us on the path of enlightenment, preparedness, and become a son or daughter of Jesus
According to Entwistle (2015) epistemology falls under the science of philosophy which main concerns are theory and explanation of knowledge. (Entwistle, 2015) Main epistemic methods are logical reasoning and empiricism. Some other concerns are doubts if our knowledge claims present just an opinion or justified belief. The basic epistemologic foundation is a search for a causation and proofs. For instance, if the God exists is there any empirical data to support that statement? I certanly believe that epistemology and Christianty stand in front of each other. In other words, they are on oposite sides and fundamentally incompatible with each other.
In order to succeed one needs truth. Everyone is capable of making decisions, however, truth is a key accessory to making such decisions better. One must be aware that what one believes, imagines, and desires to be true, are all different (Blackburn, 2009). Defining truth is difficult for some claim truth is concrete and can be proved in a structural manner. Others simply avoid the definition saying it is too abstract to be narrowed down into a single statement the world can agree on. For example, students have different ways of learning, thus to each student, a particular learning style is the best way to learn, and that is the student’s truth. Many have tried to tackle the definition of truth and from it came about the Correspondence Theory,
We, as human beings, tend to think that the truth is what we believe to be true. But the truth is the truth even if no one believes that it is the truth. We also think that the truth brings unpleasantness, and that we hate telling the truth. “The challenge of the sage is to decode the clues and solve the underlying riddle of existence, our own and that of the cosmos.” (The Sage). The relation between this quotation and my life is that, I always want to search for the truth, and telling the truth is another
Reason is the ability to think and form logical judgements based on the information provided and rational thought. Through the scientific revolution, Science became considered a form of reason, as the methods used, influenced by the works of Bacon, of gathering evidence, evaluating data and reasoning about the results, fit into the structure and definition of reason that has evolved. Views on the compatibility of reason and religion, however, have changed tremendously from the philosophy of the Greeks to that of the modern day. Richard Dawkins, as the quote depicts, even going so far as to say that faith is “one of the world’s greatest evils” in today’s society. Looking at the views of past rationalist philosophers Locke and Voltaire, and
...nt. Otherwise facts gained only have the potential to gain meaning, and many facts will turn out to be disconnected, never finding their place in a person’s experience. Facts grow naturally out of meaningful experience, but meaningful experience which leads to more facts do not necessarily flow from facts.
In many aspects of our lives, the use of faith as a basis for knowledge can be found. Whether it is faith in the advice of your teacher, faith in a God or faith in a scientific theory, it is present. But what is faith? A definition of faith in a theory of knowledge context is the confident belief or trust in a knowledge claim by a knower, without the knower having conclusive evidence. This is because if a knowledge claim is backed up by evidence, then we would use reason rather than faith as a basis for knowledge . If we define knowledge as ‘justified true belief’, it can be seen that faith, being without justification, can never fulfill this definition, and so cannot be used as a reliable basis for knowledge. However, the question arises, what if a certain knowledge claim lies outside of the realm of reason? What if a knowledge claim cannot be justified by empirical evidence and reasoning alone, such as a religious knowledge claim? It is then that faith allows the knower to decide what is knowledge and what is not, when something cannot be definitively proved through the use of evidence. When assessing faith as a basis for knowledge in the natural sciences, the fact arises that without faith in the research done before us, it is impossible to develop further knowledge on top of it. Yet at the same time, if we have unwavering faith in existing theories, they would never be challenged, and so our progress of knowledge in the natural sciences would come to a standstill. Although I intend to approach this essay in a balanced manner, this essay may be subject to a small degree of bias, due to my own non-religious viewpoint.
Truth can be defined as conformity to reality or actuality and in order for something to be “true” it must be public, eternal, and independent. If the “truth” does not follow these guidelines then it cannot be “true.” Obviously in contrary anything that goes against the boundaries of “truth” is inevitably false. True and false, in many cases does not seem to be a simple black and white situation, there could sometimes be no grounds to decide what is true and what is false. All truths are a matter of opinion. Truth is relative to culture, historical era, language, and society. All the truths that we know are subjective truths (i.e. mind-dependent truths) and there is nothing more to truth than what we are willing to assert as true (Hammerton, Matthew). A thing to me can be true while for the other person it may not be true. So it depends from person to person and here the role of perception comes into play. As truth is a vital part of our knowledge, the distinctions between what is true and what is false, shape and form the way we think and should therefore be considered of utmost importance. We often face this situation in real life through our learning curves and our pursuit of knowledge to distinguish between what is true and what is false. The idea of there being an absolute truth or also known as universal truth has been debated for centuries. It depends on many factors such as reason, perception and emotion.
When first looking at the relationship between philosophy and religion, I found it easier to explain the differences rather than the similarities. I began this paper the same way I do others. This generally involves a profound amount of research on the topic at hand. However, in contrast to the other papers I have done, the definitions of philosophy and religion only raised more questions for me. It was fascinating how the explanations differed dramatically from author to author.