Rosenhan’s article On Being Sane in Insane Places brings up many important aspects professionals in the mental health field, and society as a whole, need to consider when treating those who experience mental illness. One of the important key concepts of this article illustrates the difficulty of determining who is “sane” and who is “insane”. This article mentions that those who are diagnosed with a mental illness are not encouraged to fully recover, but rather live in remission and become labeled in a very permanent manner. This type of labeling leads institutions and the professional staff who work for these institutions to consciously and unconsciously distance themselves from the patients (or in some case behave abusively
Many people considered to be mentally ill were sent to facilities known as “Asylums” or state run institutions. People who showed signs of mental disorders were carted...
The word “asylum” has been associated with the idea of patients being abused and experimented on, but history has shown that is not completely accurate. Asylums are normally connected to the 1900s, but they have been around for a much longer time period. In the 1800s, asylums were seen as places where patients could retreat to and be cared for in a humane way, which is why the word “asylum” did not have negative connotations. As time moved on, American citizens saw asylums as a creepy and scary place, thus why we use words such as institution or facility today. Throughout the years the care of the mentally ill has been under America’s scrutiny. The care of patients and the methods used to aid them have caused much controversy from the development of asylums until, and after, their decline.
According to Szasz (2005), “In principle, the mental patient is considered competent (until proven [otherwise]). In practice, the client is regularly treated as if he were incompetent and the psychiatrist who asserts that he needs treatment is treated as if he were the patient’s guardian” (p.78). During the 1940’s patients who were mentally ill were considered “legally incompetent” when committed into a mental health facility. Relatives of the patients could release them by providing care in their homes for the client. Unfortunately, Szasz (2005) claims, that “the treatment of mental diseases is no more successful today than it was in the past” (p.78).
The fight for improved health care for those with mental illness has been an ongoing and important struggle for advocates in the United States who are aware of the difficulties faced by the mentally ill and those who take care of them. People unfortunate enough to be inflicted with the burden of having a severe mental illness experience dramatic changes in their behavior and go through psychotic episodes severe enough to the point where they are a burden to not only themselves but also to people in their society. Mental institutions are equipped to provide specialized treatment and rehabilitative services to severely mentally ill patients, with the help of these institutions the mentally ill are able to get the care needed for them to control their illness and be rehabilitated to the point where they can become a functional part of our society. Deinstitutionalization has led to the closing down and reduction of mental institutions, which means the thousands of patients who relied on these mental institutions have now been thrown out into society on their own without any support system to help them treat their mental illness. Years after the beginning of deinstitutionalization and after observing the numerous effects of deinstitutionalization it has become very obvious as to why our nation needs to be re-institutionalized.
With more frequent mental illnesses showing up within society today, many threats are posed. Are these ill people safe on their own? Can they raise families of their own if they cannot take care of themselves? Who should be in charge and responsible for these people? These questions have been regularly asked and discussed between families of those who are ill and the physicians who take care of these patients. I have come to believe that many, if not most of these people should be in care. Throughout history, mentally ill people have been known to be violent and have violent outbursts including murders and sexual offenses. Mentally ill citizens cannot be held responsible for themselves due to their disabilities. However, these citizens are ill and should be contained in hospitals to prevent the threat they pose to society.
The overall message and core argument this book offers is that the new version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the DSM-5, will cause an enormous increase of people who are not mentally ill being diagnosed with a mental disorder and receiving unnecessary treatment for it. Allen Frances argues that assigning everyday problems to mental disorders causes massive disadvantages for individuals and society. Diagnosing a healthy person as mentally ill will lead to unnecessary, harmful medications, the constricting of horizons, misallocation of medical recourses, and wasting the budgets of families and the state. He states as well that we do not take responsibility for our own mental well-being. We do not trust our self-healing brains anymore, which have kept us sane all this time, but we put our trust in the medications of the drug companies, the ‘’Big Pharma’’ as Frances calls it, which are making immense profits. According to Frances the DSM-5 will turn the current diagnostic inflation in the United States into hyperinflation by converting millions of ‘’normal’’ people into ‘’people with a mental disorder’’. This will cause that individuals who really need psychiatric help are ignored, while the ‘’worried well’’ receive most of the treatment, which will often causes nothing more than damage for them. Frances charts the history of psychiatric fads throughout history and argues that whenever we randomly label another aspect of the human condition a ‘’disease’’, we further drift away at our human adaptability and diversity, dulling everything what is normal and losing something fundamental of ourselves in the process.
One in every seventeen people in America suffers from a mental disorder. These disorders inhibit the afflicted person from functioning properly and coping normally with daily life. Many afflicted with a psychological disorder do not exhibit obvious symptoms, as medical advancements have made it possible for these disorders to be suppressed or even nonexistent. Today, however, harsh stigmas exist that unfairly categorize those with a mental illness as violent, unfriendly, and abnormal. The media and federal government are culprits in fabricating the unrealistic depictions of mental disability that define the portrayal of those who are mentally or psychologically disadvantaged.
The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world and of that over sixty percent of jail inmates reported having a mental health issue and 316,000 of them are severely mentally ill (Raphael & Stoll, 2013). Correctional facilities in the United States have become the primary mental health institutions today (Adams & Ferrandino, 2008). This imprisonment of the mentally ill in the United States has increased the incarceration rate and has left those individuals medically untreated and emotionally unstable while in jail and after being released. Better housing facilities, medical treatment and psychiatric counseling can be helpful in alleviating their illness as well as upon their release. This paper will explore the increasing incarceration rate of the mentally ill in the jails and prisons of the United States, the lack of medical services available to the mentally ill, the roles of the police, the correctional officers and the community and the revolving door phenomenon (Soderstrom, 2007). It will also review some of the existing and present policies that have been ineffective and present new policies that can be effective with the proper resources and training. The main objective of this paper is to illustrate that the criminalization of the mentally ill has become a public health problem and that our policy should focus more on rehabilitation rather than punishment.
As time goes on, the law has put more emphasis on facility just like Bridgewater State Hospital in which many of the actions of the facility workers can face legal consequences such as facing prison time, fines, lawsuits, and etc. Society has a better understanding of why certain people act the way that they do and being more knowledgeable about psychology and mental diseases allows us to have a different approach when dealing with these topics or these individuals. In today’s era, there are many normal individuals who are willing to stand up for those who do not have a voice of their own. I believe that this change in one’s ability to stand up for another individual or group of individuals is what brought about change to the medical environment of those who are mentally