Pros And Cons Of Nonviolent Drug Offenders

1085 Words3 Pages

Nonviolent Drug Offenders Nonviolent drug offenders should not be given mandatory jail sentences because the prisons don’t have the room, it already costs a lot of money to run the prisons, and by them putting the offenders into prison they are taking a parent away from a child who may need them the most. Drugs are illegal and yes most people involved with them are or become dangerous. Those are the types of offenders that should be thrown into prison especially if they are the type that harm our Law Enforcement. But if the offenders are nonviolent there is no need to lock them up when we can’t even afford to. They could get some other type of punishment for getting involved in the illegal activity. It is becoming a problem for prisons to receive more of the dangerous inmates because there is already a limited amount of food, they are having some overcrowding issues, and the cells in the prisons are smaller than the average bedroom. “There are about 2.3 million people incarcerated and about half of them for nonviolent crimes” (Taylor 1). There are over a million inmates in a prison, and these inmates have to stay in a very small cell and sometimes have to share with one or two more of the other inmates. Drugs are illegal and by selling or using them is breaking the law, but …show more content…

Prisons are already overcrowded and by putting them into the prison, they are going to take up space, space that the prisons don’t have and taking away an opportunity to lock up and actual criminal. If we were to take out all of the nonviolent offenders, we could save so much more money, $95 dollars a day just for one inmate. By not putting them into prison, we are not going to be taking a parent away from their child. Children need their parents, regardless of the choices and mistakes that parents make. Therefore nonviolent drug offenders should not be hiven mandatory jail

Open Document