Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
College athletes and economics
Athletic scholarships good or bad
Evaluate the effects of motivation on sports performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: College athletes and economics
The college experience is now being labeled as a luxury only available to those who can afford it. In a roundtable discussion held by Congressman John Carney (D-DE), it was pointed out that the cost of attending college has increased up to 570 percent over the past three decades. Many young students find it difficult to achieve their goal of obtaining a higher education. The student athlete, however, does not need to have money or high intelligence to receive this type of education. All they need is pure talent and a big break. Now, few student athletes feel money should be added to the mix. This would only add insult to those who still cannot afford college. Student athletes should not be paid due the fact they are blessed with a free education and other benefits not normally given to regular students.
An athletic scholarship is the key to a better life for most young students. It often is the difference of how well an individual will push themselves to perform at a higher level. A study on motivation suggested the idea of the athletic scholarship has a negative effect on both non-scholarship and scholarship athletes (Medic et al. 292). The main highlight of the study was the decreased motivation in the players’ respective sports (Medic et al. 300). Results were closely similar for both non-scholarship and scholarship players (Medic et al. 300). Added pressures of obtaining or maintaining a scholarship were to blame for driving the student athletes to sacrifice love of the game for the benefits of a scholarship and everything that comes with it (Medic et al. 301).
This effect is already in full swing as most athletes see a free education as the main attraction for pushing themselves to be the best in sports. If colleges star...
... middle of paper ...
...t they are not just handed out like candy. An elite few earn the chance for a free education. This opportunity should not be tarnished by greed.
Works Cited
Congressman Carney, College Administrators Discuss Rising Cost of Higher Education. Lanham: Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc, 2013. ProQuest. Web. 6 Apr. 2014.
Medic, Nikola, et al. "The Effects of Athletic Scholarships on Motivation in Sport." Journal of Sport Behavior 30.3 (2007): 292-306. ProQuest. Web. 6 Apr. 2014.
Burton, Richard. "College Athletes are Already Paid with their Education." U.S.News & World Report 04 2013: 1. ProQuest. Web. 6 Apr. 2014 .
Zissou, Rebecca. "Fair Play." Junior Scholastic Dec 09 2013: 15. ProQuest. Web. 6 Apr. 2014 .
Lewis, Michael, and Bob Williams. "SHOULD COLLEGE FOOTBALL PLAYERS BE PAID?" New York Times Upfront Nov 17 2008: 22. ProQuest. Web. 6 Apr. 2014 .
With more Americans falling to the lower middle class, (Curtis) action needs to be taken to ensure that young Americans are not priced out of college because the price of tuition is so high. In addition, many of our top private universities are in danger of being accessible only to those from the most affluent families.
Tyson Hartnett of The Huffington Post once said “Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke.” This quote regards a tremendous controversy that has been talked about for the past few years. He talks about whether or not college athletes should be paid for their duties. Despite the fact college athletes are not professionals, they should most certainly be paid for playing for their respective schools due to many factors. These factors include health risks and the income bring in for their colleges as well as to the National Collegiate Athletic Association.
Should college athletes get paid an additional salary? They are an important assets to universities and colleges, so why should they not? How else would universities justify taking advantage of these young men and women? These are questions that arise when pondering the issue. This has been a large controversy over the years of rather or not college athletes should be paid, more specifically football and basketball players. However, they fail to mention that colleges are only considering paying a select few, the stars of the sports. Every single sport in colleges is making revenue for those campuses, making colleges money hungry. Thus, if they decide to only pay a select few, would that leave out women sports all together? Why pay college athletes more on top of everything they already receive? Most college athletes receive free tuition, medical care, meal plans and room and board, which can acquaint to more than a quarter million dollars for their entire college career (Scoop, 2013). Why ask for more? What is this teaching our youth? They should appreciate their chance to do what they love and value the education they are receiving, because that education is far more valuable than a potential sports salary. Even though colleges and college athletes have a few good points on why they believe they should get paid, over all the issue is larger than that, college athletes already make their share of “money” through free education and much more.
Many sports people say that if the NCAA pays the athletes to play, it will encourage them to stay in school longer. The money that the athletes will receive at the next level will be bigger than any amount the NCAA can afford to pay them. Athletes argue that the NCAA and ESPN are making billions of dollars off of them to air their games; why can’t they get compensation for it. This argument is valid, but no matter what amount, free education is far more valuable than any financial amount. You’re talking about giving hundreds of thousands of dollars to
Schneider, Raymond G. "College Students' Perceptions on the Payment of Intercollegiate Student-Athletes." College Student Journal 35.2 (2001): 232. Questia School. Web. 3 Feb. 2014.
Today there are over 450,000 college athletes and the National College Athletics Association (NCAA) faces a difficult decision on whether or not college athletes should be paid. Many people believe that they should and many believe they should not. There are several benefits that college’s athletes receive for being a student athlete. Why should they receive even more benefits than their scholarship and numerous perks?
Mitchell, Horace, and Marc Edelman. "Should College Student-Athletes Be Paid?." U.S. News Digital Weekly 5.52 (2013): 17. Business Source Complete. Web. 8 Apr. 2014.
The college athletes of their respective sports today, have the opportunity of showcasing their talents in competition on local and national programming on a regular basis which has lately brought attention this controversy, paying college athletes. The issue was brought on by the athletes over time, then caught onto coaches, sports columnists, and fans. The athletes dedicate themselves to the sport to a caliber comparable to the professional tier. The idea of paying the athletes could be considered as they play major factor in reputation of their schools, as well as funds for their schools. However most colleges do not have profitable sports teams. Thus, paying athletes would prove to be a very difficult endeavor and this could destroy college athletics as we know them today.
In today’s society, one of the big controversies with sports is, should student athletes be be paid a salary? Some people believe that they should be paid and others would completely disagree. Even though they technically are being paid, they really are not. The only type of way the athletes would be paid is through financial aid or if they have a job. Only their education is being paid by the school. Although some people believe that they should be paid, it would not be a good idea at all. So college athletes should not be paid at all because they are basically being paid to study and play a sport.
The payment of NCAA student-athletes will deteriorate the value of an education to the athletes. The value of an education for a young man or woman cannot be measured. It is our gate way to success as...
Mitchel, Horace and Marc Eldelman. Should College Student- Athletes be Paid? 6 January 2014. 6 April 2014 .
College bound students around the world are in search of an easier route to be accepted into college. What about college athletes? These students are those who stand out. Many college athletes feel as though they deserve a “reward” for enhancing the school’s program. Though they may deserve acknowledgement of their participation, lowering admission standards will lower their effort in school as well. Intercollegiate athletic programs corrupt their educational institutions by advertising a double standard and devaluing scholarships in favor of athletic competition.
There have been ongoing arguments over the past decade of whether or not college athletes should be paid to play. Many argue that they do not have time to get real jobs because the requirements for the sport that they participate in are far too demanding. Others cite that these athletes are provided full scholarships to attend the schools at which they are playing the sport. However regardless of the argument, I still feel that college athletes should NOT be paid to play.
Many people believe that College athletes have it easy, and who wouldn’t think that? A free education, free living; getting to travel and play the sport that many people would love to still be able to. Student athletes also get to pick classes earlier than a regular student and have the ability to be excused from classes to go to games and special events. The life of a student athlete sounds like an enticing thing for many people; especially those who are not student athletes on scholarships or walk-ons to a college team. The rising cost of attending college has made the younger athletic population work just as hard to receive a scholarship to play a sport, because they may come from poverty where they can’t otherwise afford to attend school, which is beneficial to them. Understand, that college is a place where academics comes first, and everything else is second; this includes athletics. But are these athletes treated fairly and given all the right things they need to succeed in life, let alone college?
For decades there has been a debate on student athletes and their drive to succeed in the classroom. From the very beginning of organized college level athletics, the goal to want to succeed in athletics has forced students to put academics to the back burner. In spite of the goal to want to succeed over a hundred years of attempts to check limits of intercollegiate athletic programs on colleges' academic standards still seems to struggle to this day. This brings to surface one of the most asked questions in sports, “What effect does college sports have on academics and economics?” Herbert D. Simons, Derek Van Rheenen, and Martin V. Covington, authors of “Academic Motivation and the Student Athlete” researched the topic on whether athletics and academics benefit each other. Bryan Flynn, the author of “College Sports vs. Academics” poses the question “Should institutions of higher learning continue to involve themselves in athletic programs that often turn out to be virtual arms races for recruiting talented players who bring big money and prestige, but put academics to the back burner?” Although both authors agree that sports have an impact on an athlete’s academics, the focus of their argument differs.