No Country For Old Men Essay

819 Words2 Pages

No Country for Old Men by Joel and Ethan Coen can have several different interpretations of what the film really meant. The authors deliberately included clues and connections between certain things throughout the movie to point the audience in the direction that they wanted. The story begins with a hunter named Llewellyn Moss taking a shot at a deer in the desert. He hit the deer but it was only wounded so it stumbled off. At first it seems as though the movie was about Moss, who comes across a drug deal gone wrong and discovers 2 million dollars left behind by the cartel. Then Moss gets targeted by a psychotic serial killer named Anton Chigurh who also wanted the money. As the movie proceeds it becomes evident that the meaning wasn’t really …show more content…

However, the violence was deliberate to prove a point. The Coen Brothers put so much violence in this movie to show the reality of how the scene of this world is changing. When Ed Tom Bell, the local sheriff, went to visit his old friend Ellis about all that was going on, Ellis said “Whatcha got ain't nothing new. This country's hard on people, you can't stop what's coming, it ain't all waiting on you. That's vanity” (No Country for Old Men). This quote backs up the argument that the younger generations are progressing with this violent world and the older generations are being left in the dust, confused about the awful things going on because the world isn’t waiting on them to catch up. Bell is coming to terms with this truth and it scares him. He figures out that he is in way over his head and this causes him to want to quit his job. He realizes that he is always a few steps behind the younger, more violent generations that have little to no respect for human life. The talk that Bell had with Ellis showed him that he was no longer in control and that he couldn’t stop what was to come. However, Bell continued to be the man wearing the white hat and he kept on following Chigurh and …show more content…

The man that they lead the audience to believe was the protagonist, Llewellyn Moss, ended up being irrelevant to the story in the end. In fact, Llewellyn was so insignificant that he was killed off scene. This was done to bring the audience back to the true meaning of the story. Anton Chigurh was the most puzzling character because throughout the movie the audience tries to figure out why he murdered all those people. The way Chigurh decided to spare some lives was with a coin toss because he had his own set of values or principles. Chigurh believed in fate and to him if the victim called the coin and got it wrong, it was fate for them to die. Instead of believing it was up to him whether or not innocent people were murdered, Chigurh believed it was fate to blame. The character Ed Tom Bell was the most dynamic character. As mentioned before, Bell wears the white hat in this story but he does not save the day in the end. Bell is the hero, the protagonist and yet he fails to succeed. The Coen Brothers specifically wrote him this way in the movie to further prove their argument that good doesn’t always win. Not even the good can stop what’s

Open Document