In “ How Smartphones Hijack Our Minds,” Nicholas Carr is persuading his audience to refrain from and shorten their amount of smartphone usage, and he reveals his perspective on how he believes that smartphones are hijacking our minds, and causing issues in our society. Carr cleverly uses several devices to persuade his audience and to drive his point home. Among these devices are statistics, comprehensive language, and reasoning. Nicholas Carr uses statistics to involve the data he has found to support his claim that numbers don’t lie. “In both tests, the students whose phones were in view posted the worst scores.” Carr uses this example to provide evidence of how smartphones pose as a distraction and interrupt students from their work. Carr also uses “nearly a hundred secondary schools.” This example is used so readers can grasp the large amount of schools that are involved in the issue. Lastly Carr uses “The subjects whose phones were in view posted the worst scores, while those who left their phones in a different room did the best.” This example shows that smartphones don’t have to be present for a person to get a good score on a test. …show more content…
Carr writes “Your new phone, like your old one will become your constant companion and trusty factorum- your teacher, secretary, confessor, guru.” This example says that smartphone have become a persons best friend, and they steer us away from interaction with actual people. Carr also writes “We need to give our minds more room to think.” This example is saying that we constantly rely on our smartphones and that we need to change that and allow our minds to do work on their own. Lastly Carr writes “We love our phones for good reasons.” This example is Carr including himself into the issue and engaging with his
Doctor Jean Twenge is an American psychologist who published an article for The Atlantic titled “Has the Smartphone Destroyed a Generation?” in September 2017. The purpose of Twenge’s article is to highlight the growing burden of smartphones in our current society. She argues that teenagers are completely relying on smartphones in order to have a social life, which in return is crippling their generation. Twenge effectively uses rhetorical devices in order to draw attention to the impact of smartphones on a specific generation.
A common theme is taking place where as people feel that cell phones are starting to take over others daily lives. Many people go through their day to day lives not even relizing how often they are on their cell phones. In the article, “Our Cell Phones, Ourselves” the author Christine Rosen talks about how cell phones are starting to become a necessity in every way towards peoples lives. Rosen talks about both the good and bad effects of cell phones and how they have changed the way in which we work our daily life. Although I think cell phones can be necissary, the constant need for use could be the beginning of how cell phones will take over our every day lives.
Technology has always been at the forefront of the world’s mind, for as long as anyone can remember. The idea of “advancing” has been a consistent goal among developers. However, recently the invention of smartphones broke out into the world of technology, causing millions of people to become encapsulated in a world of knowledge at their fingertips. Jean Twenge elaborates on the impacts of the smartphone on the younger generation in her article “Has the Smartphone Destroyed a Generation?” Twenge’s article is just a sliver of the analysis that she presents in her book “IGen.” Twenge, a professor of psychology at San
Cell phones are harming education and causing grades to be lower than what they could be. The other day I got out of class early in the business building, as I usually do. I was walking down the hallway, back to my dorm, as I walked across a classroom that I happened to look inside. As the professor was in the front of the classroom giving his lesson for that day, I noticed that about fifteen of twenty students had their phones out not paying one little ounce of attention to the professor. I do not know about you, but I can not read a status on Facebook and retain the information that my professor is giving me, but that is just me.
You wouldn’t let someone steal your things, so why would you let your phone steal your mind away? In “How Smartphones Hijack our Minds”, Nicholas Carr how phones affect people’s minds and their cognitive ability. He states that as people become more dependent on their phones, their intellect weakens. He does this by his use of strong diction, comparisons such as personification and analogy and finally statistical data in order to support and strengthen his claim.
Nicholas Carr, author of “How Smartphones Hijack Our Minds”, argues that smartphones serve as a distraction to us and could easily divert our attention away. Carr supports his argument by using statistical evidence that he received based off of different group of students, credible sources to support his claim, and abstract diction when giving his explanation. Firstly, Carr uses statistical evidence to strengthen his claim. “A 2015 Journal of Experimental Psychology study found that when people’s phones beep or buzz while they’re in the middle of a challenging task, their focus wavers, and their work gets sloppier — whether they check the phone or not.”
Amy Gahran, a media consultant exploring communication in the technology era, writes about how cell phones are significant. She feels that cell phones have changed our lives by providing “…vital services and human connections…offer new hope, even through simple broadcast text messages” (Gahran). Gahran is insisting that cell phones allow us to learn news quickly, connect with safety, and can even fight crime through video recordings (Gahran). In addition, she feels that the overall benefits of owning a cell phone outweigh any negatives. This somewhat challenges the ideas presented by Rosen because it points out more benefits of cell phones. In “Our Cell Phones, Ourselves” Rosen mentions that although cell phones indeed connect us with safety, they can often lead to a sense of paranoia. To expand, she writes that parents who give children a cell phone for security purposes, develop a paranoid sense of their community and lose trust in “social institutions” (Rosen). In making this comment, Rosen argues that although cell phones may be beneficial, they can change the way we view our world. Without a cell phone, many individuals feel vulnerable, as if their phone protects them from all possible dangers that they may encounter. In fact, a Rutgers University professor challenged his students to power off their phones for 48 hours and report back with their experience (Rosen). Many felt almost lost without it and one young women described the feeling “…like I was going to get raped if I didn’t have my cell phone in my hand” (Rosen). In reality, having a cell phone will not save a person’s life in all situations. Although many, including Gahran, feel a phone is a vital tool, it has changed how we feel about the world around us and how vulnerable we feel without a phone in
In Nicholas Carr's "How smartphones hijack our minds" and Jean Twenge "Have Smartphones Destroyed A Generation? " Both authors elaborate the idea that smartphones have a crucial effect on everyday lives. This topic is suitable for discussion because smartphone addiction is embedded into all of society, and with this we have become too dependent and detached from one another. In Nicholas Carr's "How smartphones hijack our minds" the topic of how overusing smartphones have affected people are discussed.
In the study previously discussed which stated that students’ examination scores went up substantially when smartphones were banned from schools, Carr asserts that “the weakest students” (3) benefited the most from the ban. By stating how the weakest students benefited from smartphones being banned, Carr is able to sway the emotions of the reader in favor of his argument. Through his use of a study that took place in secondary school, Carr is able to take the reader back to a time when they themselves were in secondary school trying to pass their exams. With such an easy and simple solution to getting these students scores up by banning smartphones, it makes the reader side with the author in his belief that smartphones influence our thinking and some distance and separation from our phones is necessary. Carr also incorporates emotion to support his argument by discussing about how the mere presence of smartphones can mess up our social skills and relationships.
Continuously engaged, our society is becoming more dependent and addicted to cell phones. In “Hooked on Our Smartphones”by Jane E. Brody, the writer gives true statistics and some of her own opinions towards an essential accessory we call a phone. Commonly, the problems of this type of technology is addressed in her informational article. From my understanding, Jane’s thesis of this essay are the negative effects that phones produced in our society today. When phones take the spotlight, we get distracted and it takes precious time away from our family and friends.
“There are almost 180 million cell phone users and it is rapidly expanding” (Betancourt). Nearly every student in the United States owns a cell phone. Cell phones have been around for forty years. The first cell phone was placed by Martin Cooper in 1973. Cell phones become increasingly popular as the twenty-first century technology becomes more advance. People in younger generation rely on cell phone to accomplish basic needs. Some even becomes addictive to the cell phone. For example, I have a cousin who considers cell phone as an important part of her daily life. If I ask her to put away her cell phone, she would complain “I can’t live without my cell phone.” Cell phone should be prevented from using excessively because if cell phone is used in an improper way, it would ultimately becomes a distraction device for students. Therefore, students would be lack in interpersonal relationship, distracted during class, which can lead to academic failure, and distracted while driving, which can lead to serious accident and death. The negative impacts of cell phone on students are significant matters that need to be addressed.
In the article “Our Cell Phones, Ourselves”by Christine Rosen published by W. W. Norton in 2004, she explains about how technology came about and is now taking over today’s world. Just by walking down the street today, it is visible that in everybody’s hands there is a
Does phones really hijacked our minds? In “ How Smartphones Hijack Your Mind”, Nicholas Carr claims people's phones are taking over our lives and we can't live without it. In my thesis statement, Nicholas Carr appeals to the readers by using details, studies, and connections to strengthen his argument that humans are being hijacked by their phones. In “ How Smartphones Hijack Your Mind”, Nicholas Carr uses details to make his claim.
First, there is no arguing that cell phones are distracting. Sure, cell phones are wonderful inventions that put the world at our fingertips. But that’s just the problem. Whether we like to admit it or not, we are addicted to technology. Today, kids and their phones are inseparable. When don’t you see a teenager texting or browsing a social media site on their phones? This is the society we live in. If cell phone use was permitted in the school environment, students would be distracted from learnin...