New Language Policy

594 Words2 Pages

If we look at the New Language Policy, we can see how they believe that making English the “official” language would be detrimental to society. They list a bunch of reasons why we should not just have English as the “official” language. They talk about how it is unnecessary because most of America only speaks English, but 21% of those people speak another language other than English. That means that 58% of America speaks only English, those aren’t very good numbers considering that is almost half of the American population. They also believe that changing the policy to all English is very ineffective. Even if you made laws to make English official it would not have a place in the school system. The American government would be racist for promoting such outrageous ideas. …show more content…

We have been dehumanizing people for a very long time and we should not be doing that, one instance would be Abu Ghraib but it would not be as severe as that. We as people are given a set of rights that cannot be taken away from us, rather than altered. One of those rights being the freedom of speech, but also “The Fourteenth Amendment forbids abridging the privileges and immunities of naturalized citizens.” (CCCC 5.) This amendment is supposed to help all non-United States citizens gain their rights when they become a citizen. The National Language Policy tells us how we can support other dialects just like vernacular; “Recognize that people learning English need time and encouragement to learn, and that their ability to prosper over the long term requires facility in the dominant American language.” (CCCC 6.) This shows with children and learning a foreign language like Spanish or French, they need help and

Open Document