Nature Is Not The Most Superior Thing In The Renaissance Era

636 Words2 Pages

The Renaissance Era was full of writers like Emily Dickinson, Ralph Waldo Emerson, and many others that believed Nature was supreme in the universe. They believed that the trees and the animals were supreme over the world and were the most powerful things in the world. That Nature was beautiful and superior to everyone and everything.
I disagree with the Renaissance Era writers. I believe that this is a false statement. Nature is not the most superior thing in the universe because God is. Nature is a part of the most supreme thing in the universe which in the Lord. Nature had to be created to be even remotely powerful. There are many verses in the Bible that tells how God is supreme over nature and how He created it. Isaiah 40: 28 says, “Have you not known? Have you not heard? The Lord is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth. He does not faint or grow weary; His understanding is unsearchable.” This verse means God is everlasting and He won’t become weary. This means He is extremely powerful too. He is bigger …show more content…

The believe Nature is beautiful, This is very true . Nature is beautiful through its colors. The different colors of plants and animals are very pretty. The life forces in Nature are beautiful too. All the different species working together to proclaim His glory. Job 37: 14-16 says, “Listen to this, Job; stop and consider God’s wonders. Do you know how God controls the clouds and makes His lightning flash? Do you know how the clouds hang poised, those wonders of Him who has perfect knowledge?” This is asking questions about how God works through Nature. It asks how He works and makes things happen. The writer also believe Nature in very powerful. That is also very true. Nature can extremely powerful like healing purposes. The plants found in nature can be used to make medicine. There is also food in Nature like berries or animals in nature. That is how nature is

Open Document