Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Napster incident according to legal and ethical
Napster: from illegal weapon to killer application
Napster: from illegal weapon to killer application
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Napster incident according to legal and ethical
Napster is Good
There is a corporation that has brought up plenty of controversy; its name is Napster Incorporated. Napster is located in Redwood City, California. The problem is that some record companies and artists are saying that Napster is infringing on their copyright laws by offering a program were you can share and download copyrighted songs for free. Napster is currently at service too more than 20 million users. I’m currently one of those users. I think that the lawsuits brought upon are silly and ridiculous, and have no point because Napster first started the record sales for the artists have grown rapidly. Also Napster is breaking no law because I believe that they are just following a law that lets users have “fair use” which gives them the right to sample and exchange the music of new artists who want to share their property. And Napster is helping build the market for digital distribution by building consumers awareness and acceptance of downloading music.
You’re probably all wondering when this great corporation started and how it got brought about. It all started in January of 1999 when Shawn Fanning, the creator of Napster, dropped out of Northeastern University in the first semester of his freshman year to finish writing the software for Napster. Then the first download is completed on June 1, 1999 and Napster begins its operations. Then on December 7 of 1999 things start going downhill when the Record Industry Association of America (RIAA) sues Napster for copyright infringement. Asking for damages of $100,000 each time a song is copied. Then the rock band Metallica sues Napster for copyright infringement on April 13, 2000. Then to show Napster’s concern about copyright infringement they kick off more than 300,000 for downloading Metallica using Napster’s services. I was also one of those users that got kicked off. Then on July 26, 2000 things go crazy as the U.S. District Judge Marilyn Patel rules in favor of the record industry and orders Napster to stop allowing copyrighted material to be exchanged over its network.
It is ordered that Napster to be shut down in two days time. But then 9 hours before Napster would have been shut down, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rules that Napster should be allowed the continue operating.
Now Napster is still up and running, and Napster’s 46 employees are celebrating.
The RIAA believe that Napster has helped users infringe copyright. The threat of the lawsuit has been around since the conception of Napster and was actually filed four months after Napster went on line. The case is not as clear-cut as it first appears. RIAA argues that most of the MP3's on Napster's site are mainly pirated. Therefore, by Napster allowing and actually making it easier for users to download MP3's this means that they are assisting Copyright infringement.
We have all watched over the last year and a half as the controversy over the digital music provider Napster has clogged our television screens and lined our floors in the forms of newspaper articles. We are also well aware of the implications and revenue losses that the service either directly or indirectly causes. What I am going to investigate more in-depth in this article is, more specifically, the effect that Napster has on the operations of record stores worldwide. I am going to try to describe the most profound effects that Napster has on this industry.
Napster does not condone copyright infringement, there is no opportunity in the software to stop this, or for royalties to be paid to the song belongs to. The reaction from recording artists, record labels and other music industry players has been varied, but primarily anti-Napster. The first action to be taken against Napster was by the band Metallica. In April of this year, they sued Napster Inc for copyright infringement.
A popular program easily accessible on the Internet is called Napster. After you download it from Napster’s site, you basically tell it where you keep your Mp3 files and when it connects it cross-references everyone’s files and lets you search through them all and download as you please. 90% of the files that are traded daily are illegally “ripped” from CDs. Napster has a blurb at startup that states “Copying or distributing unauthorized Mp3 files may violate United States and/or foreign copyright laws. Compliance with copyright law remains your responsibility.” The RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) is charging the site with copyright infringement and alleges that Napster has created a base for music piracy on an unprecedented scale. Napster contends that they provide the platform, not the actions, and that as the blurb states it’s up to the people. Napster is not at fault because the RIAA has overstepped their boundaries and infringed on first amendment rights online.
which gives artists the exclusive rights to their music from the moment of its creation until,
MP3 is a file format which compresses audio files to efficiently store the audio data in files
Most recently the Supreme Court had to decide whether it was fair or not for music fans to download their favorite songs free of any royalties to the artists. The program, design by two college students, is named Napster and its designed to allow the sharing of mp3 music files over the Internet. Currently, the program is still available and operating with much support from its users.
What trends in networking in the 1990’s and early 2000’s drove the popularity of Napster? What other technologies contributed to Napster’s success?
Our life is a fantastic journey made all the better with great music. If you’ve got a huge collection of music and playlists, you may want to transfer them to various devices, edit the track and album information and (most importantly) be able to play them whenever you want. I put together a list of the top music management software solutions to help you to customize your music library.
According to the text A Gift of Fire, Napster “opened on the Web in 1999 as a service that allowed its users to copy songs in MP3 files from the hard disks of other users” (Baase, 2013, p. 192, Section 4.1.6 Sharing Music: The Napster Case). Napster was, however, “copying and distributing most of the songs they traded without authorization” (A Gift of Fire, Section 4.1.6 Sharing Music: The Napster Case). This unauthorized file sharing resulted in a lawsuit - “eighteen record companies sued for contributory infringement claiming that Napster users were blatantly infringing copyrights by digitally reproducing and distributing music without a license” (Communications Law: Liberties, Restraints and the Modern Media, 2011, p. 359).
The story really begins with Napster and its free software that allowed users to swap music across the Internet for free using peer-to-peer networks. While Shawn Fanning was attending Northeastern University in Boston, he wanted an easier method of finding music than by searching IRC or Lycos. John Fanning of Hull, Massachusetts, who is Shawn's uncle, struck an agreement which gave Shawn 30% control of the company, with the rest going to his uncle. Napster began to build an office and executive team in San Mateo, California, in September of 1999. Napster was the first of the massively popular peer-to-peer file sharing systems, although it was not fully peer-to-peer since it used central servers to maintain lists of connected systems and the files they provideddirectories, effectivelywhile actual transactions were conducted directly between machines. Although there were already media which facilitated the sharing of files across the Internet, such as IRC, Hotline, and USENET, Napster specialized exclusively in music in the form of MP3 files and presented a user-friendly interface. The result was a system whose popularity generated an enormous selection of music to download. Napster became the launching pad for the explosive growth of the MP3 format and the proliferation of unlicensed copyrights.
A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster Inc., 239 f.3d 1004 (U.S. Court of Appeals For The 9th Circuit 2 12, 2001).
In 2000, Metallica filed a lawsuit against Napster and won. As a result, Napster banned about 300,000 of its users who were sharing Metallica songs. Soon after, the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) filed a suit against Napster and the file-sharing server was forced to shut down. [1]
Napster is a company that developed the so-called peer-to-peer technology that lets people search and retrieve music files directly from one another's personal computers. When Napster first came out, millions of internet users worldwide were illegally downloading and distributing copyrighted music, videos, images, and software for free. After being vilified by the entertainment industry, which claims that Napster and any similar programs could make piracy of almost any digital work unstoppable, and many court battles, Napster was ordered by court to be shutdown in 2000. The technology has been praised as a revolutionary development for the Internet—unaware of the problems that would arise from such practices. However, the termination of Napster was not enough, months later, dozens of new, like programs were being developed and used. And since Napster, not much has been done to stop these latest downloading programs.