One day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich is not a book about a superhuman. It is not a story about someone who is weaker and more desperate than everyone else. It is not a tale of greatness, nor is it about extraordinary faults. Instead, Aleksander Solzhenitsyn chose to center his story around Ivan denisovich Shukhov, an average, unnoticeable Russian prisoner.
Shukhov is a likeable and yet somewhat naïve fellow who is just like everybody else. In fact, what really makes this book remarkable is not Shukhov himself. What makes it special is that, even though at first glance the story may seem to be about Shukhov, it is actually a tale of events and common occurrences that could happen to anyone. The book is not just a detail of one day in the life of Ivan, it is a relatable story of what could happen to anyone shoved into a Russian prison camp. Ivan’s life in the book is shown to be nothing more than a picture of the thousands of lives that were lost or destroyed in the Stalinist camps. Ivan Denisovich Shukhov is not one character, Ivan Denisovich Shukhov is the picture of “anyman.” Using the depiction of the beliefs, hopes, and need to survive that would arise in a common prisoner Solzhenitsyn creates a story of the victory of humane principles over corruption.
Solzhenitsyn uses many techniques and skills in his book to portray an accurate representation of “anyman.” The first of these is Shukov’s meager means of endurance. In the book there are many prisoners and workers in the camp and they are all connected by one thing: the need for survival. Of course, there is no one way to survive and as the people in the camp live out their days in prison they must each figure out how they will endure.
First, the camp’s “free” workers m...
... middle of paper ...
...ry over the common traitor, the one who is willing to give over his mates. In the very beginning of the story it is said that in camp “The first to go is the guy who… squeals to the screws. (2)”
Throughout the book Solzhenitsyn uses the portrayal of the common prisoner, the man with average desires, views and means of survival, to show how civil values are victorious over evil. To show how the person who wins the small victories is not the person who lets go of his disciplines and drops to a place where nothing and no one matters except themselves. To show how the person who will make it through the night without having their throat cut is the one who holds on to their mental constitution. They will be the ones who get the extra cigars and the friends who will help them in times of need. The book is truly a story of victory; the victory of morals over selfishness.
"Three days in the hole, normal working hours" (4). This quote reveals the punishment that prisoners receive if they do not follow the rules. The quote shows Shukhov is punished for oversleeping, and the punishment certainly is extremely cruel. Even though punished, Shukhov still strives to continue to show he is not the type of man that is weak. This is a conflict that many of the prisoners have to deal with. Everything they do is considered a problem and a consequence must be given. His goal is simply to survive in the camp. Because of Shukhov's determination, everything that happens in the prison makes him stronger. His actions in the novel show that he is still brave and strong to survive through these harsh hardships. "The great thing was that he'd beaten that scavenger Fetyukov to it, and here he was now smoking away till it burned his feet and his head" (17). This quote shows Fetyukov begging on his hand and knees for the opportunity to smoke some tobacco that Ceasar has. Ceasar then gives Shukhov the rest of the tobacco, ignoring the fact that Fetyukov was begging for it. This represents the loss of identity and dignity that Fetyukov displays. The only reason why Ceasar gave the rest to Shukhov is because he represented himself as civilized human
Dostoyevsky's writing in this book is such that the characters and setting around the main subject, Raskolnikov, are used with powerful consequences. The setting is both symbolic and has a power that affects all whom reside there, most notably Raskolnikov. An effective Structure is also used to show changes to the plot's direction and Raskolnikov's character. To add to this, the author's word choice and imagery are often extremely descriptive, and enhance the impact at every stage of Raskolnikov's changing fortunes and character. All of these features aid in the portrayal of Raskolnikov's downfall and subsequent rise.
Solzhenitsyn’s dynamic prison novella is the product of his time spent in a Stalinist labor camp, where he spent all his days cold and hungry. One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich is the vessel that Solzhenitsyn used to explore the various relationships between prisoners, or Zeks, and the omnipotent hunger that runs rampant throughout these labor camps. Solzhenitsyn’s prime mode to develop these relationships is through the development of characters and the plot.
In One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn creates many characters that are memorable to the reader because of both their personal situations and their responses to those situations. Through characters such as Ivan Shukhov Denisovich, Fetyukov, Aloyska the Baptist, and the two Estonians, Solzhenitsyn explores the varied reactions of the characters and the effect of these reactions on other characters' perceptions of them.
Explicitly, old habits die hard. People are configurations of time, place, and events preceding their life. History is studied to get a better sense of self and to recognize the contributions of other humans to the world in which we live. Traditions transcend verbally, physically, and emotionally through generations, making it difficult, if not impossible, to ostracize them from our being. In One Day In The Life Of Ivan Denisovich by Alexander Solzhenitsyn, tradition is dissected through the dichotomy of traditional versus post-modernist views portrayed by characters forced to serve, or monitor, time in a Soviet prison camp. Alyosha, Kilgas, and Tiurin live the Russian traditions in an environment oppositional to their native culture.
One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich concentrates on one man, Ivan Denisovich Shukhov, as he lives through one day in a Soviet gulag. The conditions of the camp are harsh, illustrating a world that has no tolerance for independence. Camp prisoners depend almost totally on each other's productivity and altruism, even for the most basic human needs. The dehumanising atmosphere of the gulag ironically forces prisoners to discover means to retain their individuality while conforming to the harsh rules, spoken and unspoken, of the camp. One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich serves as a powerful reminder of the resilience of the human spirit. Solzhenitsyn provides his readers with a seemingly hopeless situation, and then gives them characters who struggle fiercely to maintain their individuality.
... the prisoners survived. This is necessary to understand for later in the novel when an importance is placed on one's ability to outsmart the authority in order to actually survive prison. For instance, when Shukhov tricks the cook in prison into giving his squad more dishes. By using aphorisms from Shukhov, Solzhenitsyn is able to express universal truths to discredit the communistic society around him, a personal view he wished to share on a global scale. Through the characterization of Shukhov, the use of symbolism, and the use of aphorisms, Solzhenitsyn is able to recognize Shukhov as a mediator of his personal views thus providing the reader with the observations that he has made as a prisoner himself.
prisoners are treated badly at the camp, Shukhov is able to do better to keep
...e been illustrated in many events that assure his own personal morals to live a life worthy of his own actions. ¡°Somehow, even through countless years of prison life, he has maintained a sense of dignity.¡± Shukov demonstrated his integrity by attaining trust among the prisoners, a trust gained only from his previous engagements of sincere and honest deeds. Ivan¡¯s optimistic attitude motivated the others around him to perform the given tasks with a can do attitude. To a man, ones aspect of life can aspire a man to perform a great deed with a positive attitude, which Ivan had accomplished within the power plant. Ivan Denisovich¡¯s heart found sympathy for those who had suffered without a just cause for survival allowing him to remain sane throughout his sentence. His sanity was part of his meaning in life as his main goal was to live a life the best he could, and to maintain that life it was necessary for him to remain sane. Therefore the meaning in life through he eyes of Ivan Denisovich was to live a life of honesty and integrity with an optimistic attitude, allowing himself to sustain his own stature within his society while serving out his sentence as a prisoner of Communism.
In comparison we see this theme again in “One day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich” we see Ivan discovering his inner self and realizing he is a lot more than what the prison guards confined him to think of himself. He had the mentality that he was weak and
Perhaps this gives the audience insight into Chekhov’s perspective on his own life or perhaps it is only a critique of the lives his characters embody. Though it may never be fully clear what Chekhov’s reasons were for making the character’s plights so similar, it doesn’t negate the uncomfort that it inspires. Chekhov doesn’t just recognize this fact, but manipulates it, exacerbating the character’s imprisonment by using the environment to make it seem as if it’s physical as well as psychological. This fear of being trapped by one’s own life may be uncomfortable but it’s also common, something than many would rather avoid. With each story, Chekhov forces his audience to face that hard truth, and through his characters, the consequences of surrendering to
Even Shukhov admits that “they were sure to get through camp alright” (50). These people turn against their conscience and commit crimes against their friends for their own benefit. Through Shukhov’s narrative, Solzhenstein portrays this as an act of losing their morals, which represents a loss of their individualism and the progress that the camp is making in breaking them down as a person.
This man is the absolute opposite of everything society holds to be acceptable. Here is a man, with intelligent insight, lucid perception, who is self-admitted to being sick, depraved, and hateful. A man who at every turn is determined to thwart every chance fate offers him to be happy and content. A man who actively seeks to punish and humiliate himself. Dostoyevsky is showing the reader that man is not governed by values which society holds to be all important.
According to Raskolnikov’s theory in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s “Crime and Punishment”,there are two types of people that coexist in the world; the “Extraordinary” and the “Ordinary”. The ordinary men can be defined as “Men that have to live in submission, have no right to transgress the law, because they are ordinary.”(248). To the contrary “extraordinary” men are “Men that have a right to commit any crime and to transgress the law in any way , just because they are extraordinary”(248). Dostoevsky’s theory is evident through the characters of his novel. The main character, Raskolnikov, uses his theory of extraordinary men to justify contemplated murder. There is a sense of empowerment his character experiences with the ability to step over social boundaries. He is led to believe the killing of the pawnbroker is done for the perseverance of the greater good. It is ironic that character who is shown to be powerful in the early stages of the novel subsequently go on to show many weaknesses.
This is seen from his perspective saying that “you live with your feet in the mud and there's no time to be thinking about how you got in or how you're going to get out”. Through this, Solzhenitsyn symbolises life in prison with “mud”, which has properties in which resist movements and drowns your feet, similar to life in prison having difficulty to get out of the system and having no time to think for himself. This not only shows his accepting mindset but also shows the lack of perseverance to want to escape. In a prison genre, the story oftentimes shows the protagonist prevailing and achieving the goal which is to be free. In One day on the contrary, Ivan and the prisoners all have little to no drive and ability to fight, projecting the weakness in hierarchy against the authoritative figures. When explored in context, during the Stalinist-era, the system was filled with arbitrary rules which meant that any form of rebellion would lead to execution. With this in mind, the prisoners in the novel understand that with the action of revolting, comes along a high chance of being killed. Hence the portrayal of Ivan’s survivalist mindset is purposely done to show the weakness