Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Principal of morality
Foundations of ethical behaviors
Basic principles of morality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Moral and Ethical Obligations to Animals
1888 Words4 Pages
Morality is a naturally occurring, global, psychological effect many believe is based on a human’s ability to empathise, it is thought the uncomfortable feeling of seeing another suffer pushes us to prevent the suffering. It can be viewed as the governing principal that allows us to know the difference between what is right and wrong, it drives us to act in a way which allows other beings we exist with to have a positive experience, preventing suffering. This is why irreprehensible acts such as mental abuse, physical and sexual assault and murder are considered just so irreprehensible. The morality principal occurs in individuals to varying degrees, for example person A may dedicate their working life to helping underprivileged humans acting in a moral way towards mankind, while person B is a dedicated vegan, donates to charity and lives a lifestyle which is 100% friendly to the earth. Looking at these examples it is easy to see the differences lay in each individual’s interpretation of a being having an experience, this therefore determines their ability to empathise with humans, animals and or nature. Knowing the rudimentary explanation of morality, ethics could almost be described as the law of morality. The word ethics is used in an abundance of contexts and therefore is described using a vast amount of different guidelines. When biomedical or behavioural research is conducted on humans, which almost is the only research conducted on humans, a specific set of laws known as ‘The Belmont Report’ demands adherence. Originating in the USA in 1979 it is now used almost worldwide, while it is a short set of laws it explicitly states the benefits of the research must outweigh any risks to the participants, each participant must b... ... middle of paper ... ...1st ed.). Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press. Knudson, M. (1973). Development of Two-Way Communication with the Chimpanzee Washoe.American Anthropologist, 75(6), 2024--2026. National Health and Medical Research Council,. (2013). Australian code of practice for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes 8th edition. Regan, T. (1989). Does the Animal Kingdom Need a Bill of Rights?. Presentation, Royal Institute of Great Britain, London, UK. Nonhumanrightsproject.org,. (2014). The Nonhuman Rights Project. Retrieved 13 May 2014, from http://www.nonhumanrightsproject.org The Nonhuman Rights Project,. (2013). First-Ever Lawsuits Filed on Behalf of Captive Chimpanzees to Demand Courts Grant Them Right to Bodily Liberty. The Nonhuman Rights Project,. (2013). Nonhuman Rights Project Advances to New York Appellate Courts in Three Chimpanzee Rights Cases.
Related
The Case for Animal Rights
850 Words | 2 PagesIn conclusion, I agree with Tom Regan’s perspective of the rights view, as it explores the concept of equality, and the concept of rightful treatment of animals and humans. If a being is capable of living, and experiencing life, then they are more than likely capable of feeling pleasure and pain, except in a few instances. If humans are still treated in a respectable and right way even if some cannot vote, or think for themselves, then it is only fair that animals who also lack in some of these abilities be treated as equals. As Regan puts it, “pain is pain, wherever it occurs” (1989).
The Pros And Cons Of Ag-Gag Laws
556 Words | 2 PagesThe modern fight for animal rights has been geared toward factory farms and the removal of animal testing and ag-gag laws. Protection for test animals and farm animals has become an important focus for many animal rights groups including ASPCA. The end of uncomfortable and inhumane treatment of animals is still a fight thousands are fighting
The Ethics of Animal Use in Biomedical Research
1849 Words | 4 PagesRegan, Tom. “The Case for Animal Rights.” In Animal Rights and Human Obligations, 2 ed.. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1989.
Exploring the Ethics of Modern Day Hunting
1696 Words | 4 PagesRegan, Tom. “The Case for Animal Rights.” In Defense of Animals. Ed. Peter Singer. New York:
Negative Stereotypes of Vegetarianism
2603 Words | 6 PagesBenthall, Jonathan. "Animal Liberation and Rights." Anthropology Today 23.2 (2007): 1-3. Anthropology Plus. Web. 26 Mar. 2014.
animal experimentation
545 Words | 2 PagesLeague, Animal Defense. “Policy Statement on Animal Research.” Civil Rights in America. Woodbridge, CT: Primary Source Media, 1999. American Journey.Student Resources in Context. Web. 6 Feb. 2014.
Peter Singer, And Tom Regan, Peter Singer And Aldo Leopold
1133 Words | 3 PagesAs an advocate of animal rights, Tom Regan presents us with the idea that animals deserve to be treated with equal respect to humans. Commonly, we view our household pets and select exotic animals in different regard as oppose to the animals we perceive as merely a food source which, is a notion that animal rights activists
Ethical Conduct in Human Research
1461 Words | 3 PagesEthics refers to the values and customs of a community at a particular point in time. At present, the term ethics is guided by the moral principles that guide our everyday actions. These moral principles guide the researcher into deciding what is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’. The foundation of medical ethics is governed by two philosophical frameworks that are deontology, and utilitarianism. However ultimately the ethics committees need to balance the risks, and benefits for the participants and the community associated with the particular research proposal. This balance is quite important as the well being of participants is at risk.7
Ethics and Morality in Vegetarianism
1942 Words | 4 PagesThe Case for Animal Rights. Routledge, London-New York, 1988. Regan T. The Struggle for Animal Rights. International Society for Animal Rights.
Animal Rights: The Abolitionist Approach?
1030 Words | 3 PagesAlmost all humans want to have possession and control over their own life, they want the ability to live independently without being considered someone’s property. Many people argue that animals should live in the same way as humans because animals don’t have possession of their lives as they are considered the property of humans. An article that argues for animal rights is “The case against pets” (2016) by Francione and Charlton. Gary L Francione and Anna E Charlton are married and wrote a book together, “Animal Rights: The Abolitionist Approach (2015). Francione is a law professor at Rutgers University and an honorary professor at University of East Anglia. Charlton is also a law professor at Rutgers University and she is the co-founder of the Rutgers Animal Rights Law Clinic. In this article Francione and Charlton mainly focus on persuading people to believe in animal rights but only focus on one right, the right of animals not to be property. The article is written in a well-supported manner with a lot of details and examples backing it up, but a few counter-arguments can be made against some of their arguments.
Philosophy: Ethics and Morality
2484 Words | 5 PagesWhether put simply or scrutinized, morality cannot be defined simply by looking at it from one or two perspectives. One must acknowledge the fact that there are several different factors that affect judgment between “right” and “wrong”. Only after taking into account everything that could possibly change the definition of righteousness can one begin to define morality. Harriet Baber, a professor at San Diego State University, defines morality as “the system through which we determine right and wrong conduct”. Baber refers to morality as a process or method when she calls it a “system”. In saying “we” she then means to say that this concept does not only apply to her but also to everyone else. Through morality, according to her, one can look at an action, idea, or situation and determine its righteousness and its consequences.
Argument for Stopping Animal Abuse
2126 Words | 5 PagesTom Regan, “The Case for Animal Rights,” in In Defense of Animals, ed. Peter Singer (Oxford:
Animal Research and Testing, Is it Ethical?
2169 Words | 5 PagesWashington D.C.: Acropolis Books, 1978. Call Number: HV4711O5. Regan, Tom, and Peter Singer, eds. Animal Rights and Human Obligations.
Animal Ethics
1818 Words | 4 PagesI will first look at the views of Peter Singer, who is a utilitarian. A
Should Animals Be Kept in Captivity?
559 Words | 2 PagesWaples KA, Stagoll CS. Ethical issues in the release of animals from captivity. Roundtable. 1997; 115-120.
More about Moral and Ethical Obligations to Animals
The Case for Animal Rights
850 Words | 2 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Ag-Gag Laws
556 Words | 2 PagesThe Ethics of Animal Use in Biomedical Research
1849 Words | 4 PagesExploring the Ethics of Modern Day Hunting
1696 Words | 4 PagesNegative Stereotypes of Vegetarianism
2603 Words | 6 Pagesanimal experimentation
545 Words | 2 PagesPeter Singer, And Tom Regan, Peter Singer And Aldo Leopold
1133 Words | 3 PagesEthical Conduct in Human Research
1461 Words | 3 PagesEthics and Morality in Vegetarianism
1942 Words | 4 PagesAnimal Rights: The Abolitionist Approach?
1030 Words | 3 PagesPhilosophy: Ethics and Morality
2484 Words | 5 PagesArgument for Stopping Animal Abuse
2126 Words | 5 PagesAnimal Research and Testing, Is it Ethical?
2169 Words | 5 PagesAnimal Ethics
1818 Words | 4 PagesShould Animals Be Kept in Captivity?
559 Words | 2 Pages