Mohanty Third World Women Analysis

1805 Words4 Pages

Mohanty’s key thesis uses the lens of a feminist perspective, but also takes a look at an anti-racist and anti-imperialist lens. She looks at the interconnections between feminist, anti-racist and anti-imperialist. Subsequently, there is a discursive or material framework between First World Feminists and Third World Feminists and the way in which first world feminists perceive third world women. As the paper will discuss, it is dangerous to assume that third world women are a coherent group within the social, economic and political processes (Mohanty 17). Mohanty begins by pointing out that even if the processes of colonization may appear to be sophisticated, it can include the suppression of women and the heterogeneity of the subjects (Mohanty …show more content…

There is this concept of the veiling in Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Pakistan and India where it is seen as a form of sexual control over women (Mohanty 33). Mohanty mentions that it is inaccurate to generalize the concept of the veiling in the Middle East as a form of sexual control over women or as a universally oppressive reality (Mohanty 42). She argues that the veiling in Iran, for example, should be looked at from a different perspective at different time periods (Mohanty 42). For example, during the Revolution of 1979, some women used the veil as a means of solidarity with their working-class sisters who were part of street demonstrations; however, in the post-Revolution period, the Iranian regime forced the idea of veil as part of their mandatory religious law (Mohanty 39). The point is that it would be intellectually immoral or ignorant of people to group all veiling into a single derogatory category. Furthermore, Mohanty is right to dismantle a universal view that assumes veiling is a means of oppression on all women throughout the entire Muslim world (Mohanty 28). Subsequently, this view denies the existence of a veiled woman who is not forced to wear the veil, but she does it because of her own religious practices, while trying to employ a full …show more content…

The question then becomes: who is producing knowledge in situations of power? The person here who is producing the knowledge would be the western feminists who continuously categorize women in the third word through constructed terms and classifications. When we label women in the third world country as poor, uneducated and victimized, then we are perpetuating this idea that they are vulnerable and weak, but also that they need a man to provide for them because they are unable to take care of themselves. Mohanty states: “not everyone is able to produce knowledge in the same way and those feminist scholarly practices are inscribed in relations of power” (Mohanty 19). The more power a person has, the better chance they have of them being heard. Her argument is that western women and some of their writings about the third world women is an act of discursive colonization because the west is the primary source of knowledge (Mohanty 18). When we look at the informal practices of the production of knowledge, Mohanty deconstructs this idea that tries to define women of the third world as typical victims (Mohanty 18). Women who are portrayed as victims of male violence need a way to escape it, but if they try to defend themselves, they become situated in a

Open Document