Miller Vs Aristotle

1123 Words3 Pages

Delaina Yatoma
18 January 2017
Mrs. Borgquist
Evaluating Tragedy
Greek tragedy is a form of theatre, originating in the 5th century B.C, that focuses on human suffering, both mental and physical, bringing about catharsis within an audience. Through many of their plays, Arthur Miller and Aristotle illustrate their roles as theorists of Greek tragedy. According to Aristotle there are six main elements to tragedy, the most important being: action of the play, character qualities and musical accompaniments. Aristotle stands firm in his belief regarding each character's nature that is revealed throughout plot. His ideas refer to the downfall of a hero who is above average versus a low status man such as Willy Loman from Arthur Miller’s “Death …show more content…

Sophocles, Euripides and Miller employ the elements of tragedy in their works by accomplishing a catharsis, introducing characters which posses a tragic flaw, and revealing the steps to a miserable downfall.
Oedipus from “Oedipus Rex” is a perfect example of Aristotle's classification of a tragic hero. Although Oedipus appears to have various flaws including his temper, curiosity and ignorance, the text reveals to us that his blindness and excessive pride induced his tragic downfall. After a plague strikes the city of Thebes, citizens look to their noble king, Oedipus, to take action in improving the conditions. Oedipus receives a message that the plague will end when the murderer of Laius, …show more content…

In comparison to Sophocles' and Euripides’ traditional plots , Miller’s work demonstrates more modern drama with themes crucial to present age. Miller utilizes the ideas from “Tragedy and the Common Man” to drag his audience through an emotional rollercoaster, making them fearful of dying without recognition. Aristotle classifies a tragic downfall for a man that is of high rank or of great importance in the world. Miller’s play raises a counter example to Aristotle’s characterization considering Willy Loman is a ordinary man working to achieve the “American Dream.” He strives at becoming the best version of himself, and hopes to be remembered after he passes; which motivates him to plant seeds. Miller used a common man, Willy Loman, as the subject of his tragedy verses a significant individual such as a king. Miller states, “… the tragic feeling is evoked in us when we are in the presence of a character who is ready to lay down his life, if need be, to secure one thing- his sense of personal dignity.” The traveling salesman is extremely concerned in securing his dignity, in fact he was motivated to commit suicide in order to collect money for his sons to pursue their dreams. However, Willy has some flaws including his pride and his focus on his past dreams and desires. Also, Willy is hardheaded, disloyal ignorant about the real reasoning

Open Document