Milan Kundera's The Unbearable Lightness of Being

Milan Kundera's The Unbearable Lightness of Being

In an interview he gave after the reprinting of one of his later novels, Milan Kundera said, most eloquently, that ?the stupidity of the world comes from having an answer for everything? the wisdom of the novel comes from having a question for everything? (qtd. in O'Brien 4). This statement is one most indicative of the unique authorial style found in all of Kundera?s works, particularly his most famous novel The Unbearable Lightness of Being. Unlike previous traditional, non-autobiographical novels, Kundera chooses to indirectly reveal himself as the narrator, who, while omniscient in the control of his characters, poses questions of deep philosophical interest that even he cannot answer. This method has become problematic, however, as many critics have wrongly proclaimed this technique to represent the author?s hatred for the totalitarian regime under which his novel was written; in doing so, not only have they wrongly labeled Kundera ?a passionate defender of Western culture? (Angyal 4), but they also have ignored the larger, philosophical issues that Kundera attempts to accomplish in the novel. While many of the themes in the novel undoubtedly reveal the totalitarian regime for what it is, it will be argued that the role of the intrusive author serves to create a sense of play and freedom of movement that digs deeper than history or politics to get to the heart of more important philosophical issues.

An analysis of Kundera?s structural functions and choices within The Unbearable Lightness of Being will provide a closer view of the openness, or ?play? he strives for. One of the primary functions of Kundera as an intrusive narrator in the novel is to establish his characters as creations of his own mind. Whereas in traditional novels, the fictitious characters are assumed to be real in some imaginary world, Kundera almost immediately admits that ?it would be senseless for the author to try convince the reader that his characters once actually lived?they were born of a stimulating phrase or two from a basic situation? (39). His characters were created in light of the author?s contemplations. However, this does not automatically make the characters flat ?types?, as some have argued. To the contrary, the author?s admittance of the characters as fictional creations whom he has pondered very deeply lend ...

... middle of paper ...

...ly ignored, it is important to understand Kundera?s purposes outside of this historical context. This is the fundamental purpose of the intrusive author figure in The Unbearable Lightness of Being: to strip the traditional novel of kitschy, political codes and grind beneath the surface to greater, more complicated questions of existence that, while unanswerable by the author, are more fruitful pursuits than historical or political messages. The philosophy can be summed up in Sabina?s mantra, ?On the surface, the intelligible lie; underneath the surface, the unintelligible truth.?

Works Cited

Angyal, Andrew. ?Review: The Unbearable Lightness of Being.? MagillOnLiterature.

EBSCOHost Research Databases. Online. Available: http://web22.epnet.com. 1-5.

Kundera, Milan. The Unbearable Lightness of Being. New York: Harper and Row Publishers, Inc., 1984

O?Brien, John. ?Milan Kundera: Meaning, Play, and the Role of the Author.? Studies in

Contemporary Fiction. Fall 1992. Vol. 34, Issue 1. 1-20.

Pichova, Hana. ?The Narrator in Milan Kundera?s The Unbearable Lightness of Being.?

Slavic and East European Journal. 1992. Vol. 36, Issue 32. 217-226.