Merlin's The Sword In The Stone

1692 Words4 Pages

Science and the Media
Pop Culture depicts science not as the technical art that it is, but as more of a practice of great magic. It illustrates the professional conduits of the discipline as sorcerers and sorceresses, portraying to the average person an image of an inexplicable, divine phenomena rather than a series of cooperative components. Though this depiction is inaccurate at best, the magical, and often times supernatural, practices of science in media influences younger generations to study in the various realms of the art. Growing up, I always thought that being a scientist meant concocting potions all day in a white lab coat, or pacing back and forth in a dimly light room surrounded by beakers full of mysterious glowing liquids as …show more content…

In Disney's The Sword in the Stone, our first encounter with the infamously quirky Merlin is in his cottage, which resembles more of a science lab than the home of the greatest magician to ever have supposedly lived. Merlin's "magic" fits my childhood expectations of science because his cottage is almost the exact picture of what I imagine being a laboratory of a scientist. It is small, dimly lit, books are scattered about the room, a fire is blazing under a kettle, and a chemistry set is bubbling and gushing over with glowing green liquids off to the side. Despite the fact that Merlin is a "magician," he appears more to me as a scientist, and although he is well skilled in both science and magic, his practice of science is more magical than it is scientific. An example of this is when Merlin transforms himself and Arthur, "a young boy who is destined to be King Arthur" ("The Sword in the Stone, 2015), into squirrels to explain the principles of gravity to young Arthur. In The Sword in the Stone, magic is impossible without science and science is a confounding and incomprehensible phenomenon that cannot be explained without …show more content…

The tale of Victor Frankenstein and his monster was created with the intention of expressing to people that there is a line between science and playing God, and that line should never be crossed. However, Shelley's intentions often times go unseen simply for the fact that science is almost completely absent from the story of Victor Frankenstein. Shelley never once delves into the actual scientific act of creating the Monster. All we know of the Monster's creation is that a body is resurrected beneath a full moon and a lot of lightning is involved in the process, which is a very supernatural explanation of a scientific experiment. In opposition to Merlin, despite the fact the Frankenstein is a scientist, he appears to be more of a sorcerer of sorts for his "scientific experiment" lacks science, and is depicted as more of a grotesquely distorted Medieval Paganistic act only fit for a Grimm Brothers' tale. Logically, the creation of Victor Frankenstein's Monster does not make sense as the result of a scientific act. The dead do not rise again from a grand shock of lightening and we merely classify it as an act of science. Practical science, real science, begs for more of an explanation, for a sincere understanding of how, why, and what makes it possible to create Frankenstein's

Open Document