Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Similarities and differences between Medicare and Medicaid managed care plans
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
TAKE HOME EXAM --QUESTION #1:
Medicare and Medicaid share many similarities and have many differences in terms of the populations that are eligible for benefits; the general benefits or services covered; and how the programs are funded and administered. Furthermore, a closer inspection of Medicare reveals both strengths and flaws in the program.
Medicare, otherwise known as Title 18, is a federal program that provides healthcare for all those who are 65 years and older. Anyone 65 and older who qualifies for Social Security is automatically eligible for Medicare. In addition, Medicare covers those who are permanently disabled, as well those with kidney failure (end-stage renal disease, ESRD). (Barr, 2007)
All those who qualify for Medicare qualify for Medicare Part A and B. Under the Part A plan which is universal for all seniors receiving Social Security, the government pays for all hospitalization-related costs for 60 days. Benefits include hospice care, skilled nurse facility following hospitalization, and hospice care for terminally ill people. (Barr, 2007)
Funding for Medicare is primarily drawn from three sources: general revenues (40 percent), payroll taxes (38 percent) and premiums paid by beneficiaries (12 percent). (Foundation, 2010) Funding for Part A comes from a 1.5 % payroll tax levied on all workers and employers which is then deposited into a Hospital Insurance Trust Fund. The money paid into the Medicare Trust Fund is not used by those who are contributing to the fund but by those who are already retired. In essence, current workers are subsidizing for those who are retired. Nevertheless patients enjoying the benefits of Part A are still expected to pay a deductible unless they purchase supplementary...
... middle of paper ...
...f-pocket costs, or at the very least a stagnation of such costs, policy makers are less willing to oblige. One service that is glaringly absent from Medicare is long term care for the elderly but it does not appear as though this will be addressed by Congress soon.
Bibliography
Barr, D. A. (2007). Introduction to US Health Policy: The Organization, Financing and Delivery of Health Care in America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Foundation, T. H. (2010). Medicare: A Primer.
Winakur, J. (2005). What are we going to do with dad? Health Affairs .
Bibliography
Barr, D. A. (2007). Introduction to US Health Policy: The Organization, Financing and Delivery of Health Care in America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Foundation, T. H. (2010). Medicare: A Primer.
Winakur, J. (2005). What are we going to do with dad? Health Affairs .
appears to be slowly moving toward extinction. Public policy is not likely to provide any over-. arching continuity for long-term care in the near future (Williams & Torrens, page 218). I agree.
The United States of America accounts for only 5% of the world’s population, yet as a nation, we devour over 50% of the world’s pharmaceutical medication and around 80% of the world’s prescription narcotics (American Addict). The increasing demand for prescription medication in America has evoked a national health crisis in which the government and big business benefit at the expense of the American public.
Longest Jr., B.B (2009) Health Policy making in the United States (5th Edition). Chicago, IL: HAP/AUPHA.
Despite the established health care facilities in the United States, most citizens do not have access to proper medical care. We must appreciate from the very onset that a healthy and strong nation must have a proper health care system. Such a health system should be available and affordable to all. The cost of health services is high. In fact, the ...
Niles, N. J. (2011). Basics of the U.S. health care system. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
Reese, Philip. Public Agenda Foundation. The Health Care Crisis: Containing Costs, Expanding Coverage. New York: McGraw, 2002.
Medicare provides healthcare coverage for individuals over the age of 65, in addition, to others meeting certain criteria. The government funds Medicare through the administration of the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid and spends billions annually, on the program. Fraud runs rampantly throughout the healthcare program due to the enormous amount of money spent and the large number of people enrolled in the program. Fighting fraud of this nature necessitates diligence by everyone. Protecting oneself entails understanding what constitutes fraud, identifying it, noting suspicious practices, and taking steps towards prevention.
According to Medicare’s WebPage Medicare is a Health Insurance Program for people 65 years of age and older, some disabled people under 65 years of age, and people with End-Stage Renal Disease (permanent kidney failure treated with dialysis or a transplant). Medicare has two parts, Part A which is for basically hospital insurance. Most people do not have to pay for Part A. In addition it has a Part B, which is basically medical insurance. Most people pay a small monthly fee for Part B. Medicare first went into effect in 1966 and was originally administered by the Social Security Administration. In 1977 the control of it was switched over to the newly formed Health Care Financing Administration. Beginning in July 1973 Medicare was extended to persons under the age of 65 with certain disabling conditions. In 1988 Congress passed legislation to expand the program to cover health care costs of catastrophic illnesses.
Medicare and Medicaid are two of the United States largest broken systems, which must sustain themselves in order to provide care to their beneficiaries. Both Medicare and Medicaid are funding by a joint effort between the federal government and the local state government. If and when these governments choose to cut funding or reduce spending, Medicare and Medicaid take the biggest hit. Most people see these two benefits as one in the same, two benefits the government takes out of their pay check to help fund health care. While the government does deduct a sum from paychecks everywhere, Medicare and Medicaid are very two very different programs.
The two major components of Medicare, the Hospital Insurance Program (Part A of Medicare) and the supplementary Medical Insurance program (Part B) may be exhausted by the year 2025, another sad fact of the Medicare situation at hand (“Medicare’s Future”). The burden brought about by the unfair dealings of HMO’s is having an adverse affect on the Medicare system. With the incredibly large burden brought about by the large amount of patients that Medicare is handed, it is becoming increasingly difficult to fund the system in the way that is necessary for it to function effectively. Most elderly people over the age of 65 are eligible for Medicare, but for a quite disturbing reason they are not able to reap the benefits of the taxes they have paid. Medicare is a national health plan covering 40 mi...
Distinguishing between Medicare and Medicaid Medicare is a federally governed insurance program, primarily serving Americans over the age of 65, younger disabled meeting specific disability criteria, and dialysis patients having permanent kidney failure. Medicare is linked to Social Security, is not income based, and is available to every American meeting the requirements of the program. Those entitled to Medicare can select Original Medicare Part A (Hospital Insurance) and Part B (Medical Insurance) paying co-insurance and deductibles or opt to add Part C (Medicare Advantage Plans) paying a monthly premium and co-payments normally less than the out-of-pocket expenses for Original Medicare. Medicaid is an assistance program for low-income people regardless of age.
The U.S. healthcare system is very complex in structure hence it can be appraised with diverse perspectives. From one viewpoint it is described as the most unparalleled health care system in the world, what with the cutting-edge medical technology, the high quality human resources, and the constantly-modernized facilities that are symbolic of the system. This is in addition to the proliferation of innovations aimed at increasing life expectancy and enhancing the quality of life as well as diagnostic and treatment options. At the other extreme are the fair criticisms of the system as being fragmented, inefficient and costly. What are the problems with the U.S. healthcare system? These are the questions this opinion paper tries to propound.
The way Medicare was originally organized, the concerns of physicians and their prerogatives were kept largely in mind. The federal government allowed physicians to remain autonomous in terms of how they ran their organization, and no state doctors were hired to provide competition. The purpose of Medicare was simply to offer a greater base of people the ability to benefit from health care and proper treatments for their conditions, thus offering physicians no competition from a rigid state system. Doctors could practice as they always did, but merely had a higher base of patients they could work on, their operations and procedures being paid for through government subsidies and Medicare. Medicare imposed much more change on an administrative level than a direct influence on the doctor’s practice, making their work relatively unchanged. Physicians were able to see as many elderly patients as they wanted without the fear of impoverishing them, and making sure that they themselves were also paid (Stevens 1998, p. 451).
The US health system has both considerable strengths and notable weaknesses. With a large and well-trained health workforce, access to a wide range of high-quality medical specialists as well as secondary and tertiary institutions, patient outcomes are among the best in the world. But the US also suffers from incomplete coverage of its population, and health expenditure levels per person far exceed all other countries. Poor measures on many objective and subjective indicators of quality and outcomes plague the US health care system. In addition, an unequal distribution of resources across the country and among different population groups results in poor access to care for many citizens. Efforts to provide comprehensive, national health insurance in the United States go back to the Great Depression, and nearly every president since Harry S. Truman has proposed some form of national health insurance.
Barton, P.L. (2010). Understanding the U.S. health services system. (4th ed). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.