McCulloch V. Maryland 1819

1811 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Judicial review in the United States

“…It may with great reason be contended, that a government, entrusted with such ample powers…must also be entrusted with ample means for their execution. The power being given, it is the interest of the nation to facilitate its execution…” ("Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court") The Constitution of the United States gives Congress the powers to do things such as coin money, regulate trade, declare war, and establish post offices. Therefore, to trust the national government with such great powers means to trust them with how to execute them as well. Congress is also given enumerated powers, which are implied powers through the Constitution. If a specific power is not listed in the Constitution, it doesn’t necessarily mean that the power does not exist. The Necessary and Proper Clause listed in Article 1 Section 8 in the Constitution allows the national government to apply their enumerated powers. The Supremacy Clause written in Article VI gives the United States’ national government the power over state laws that conflict with a constitutional law. Then, the Judicial Branch has the right to declare the law unconstitutional, which is called Judicial Review. Enumerated powers, the Necessary and Proper Clause, the Supremacy Clause and Judicial Review were all major factors concerning the Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland of 1819. The case of McCulloch v. Maryland presented two strong and straightforward questions: “Did Congress have the authority to establish the bank?” and “Did the Maryland law unconstitutionally interfere with congressional powers?” ("Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law") The case McCulloch v. Maryland appeared in Supreme Court in 1819, but it is possible for one to say it began in 1791 whe... ... middle of paper ... ...hat shall rise upon the United States and its people. Works Cited "Landmark Cases." The Supreme Court. Educational Broadcasting Corporation, 2006. Web. 24 Oct 2011. . "McCulloch v. Maryland." The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. Oyez, Inc., 2005-2011. Web. 4 Nov 2011. . "McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) State Taxes, National Supremacy." Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court. Streetlaw, Inc. and The Supreme Court Historical Society , 2010. Web. 24 Oct 2011. "The Marshall-Cases: McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)." US History 1 Supreme Court Justice John Marshall Cases. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Oct 2011. .

Show More
Related

  • The Court Case of Marbury v. Madison and Judicial Review

    866 Words  | 2 Pages

    The court case of Marbury v. Madison (1803) is credited and widely believed to be the creator of the “unprecedented” concept of Judicial Review. John Marshall, the Supreme Court Justice at the time, is lionized as a pioneer of Constitutional justice, but, in the past, was never really recognized as so. What needs to be clarified is that nothing in history is truly unprecedented, and Marbury v. Madison’s modern glorification is merely a product of years of disagreements on the validity of judicial review, fueled by court cases like Eakin v. Raub; John Marshall was also never really recognized in the past as the creator of judicial review, as shown in the case of Dred Scott v. Sanford.

    Read More

  • Gibbons V. Ogden (1824)

    969 Words  | 2 Pages

    In America’s time there have been many great men who have spent their lives creating this great country. Men such as George Washington, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson fit these roles. They are deemed America’s “founding fathers” and laid the support for the most powerful country in history. However, one more man deserves his name to be etched into this list. His name was John Marshall, who decided case after case during his role as Chief Justice that has left an everlasting mark on today’s judiciary, and even society itself. Through Cases such as Marbury v. Madison (1803) and McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) he established the Judicial Branch as an independent power. One case in particular, named Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), displayed his intuitive ability to maintain a balance of power, suppress rising sectionalism, and unite the states under the Federal Government.

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Case: Tinker V. Des Moines Independent Community School District

    550 Words  | 2 Pages

    "Summary of the Decision." Landmark Cases Of The U.S Supreme Court. Street Law, Inc, n.d. Web. 1 Nov. 2013. .

    Read More

  • Three Branches: The Impact on Law Enforcement

    1151 Words  | 3 Pages

    September 17, 1787, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; during the heat of summer, in a stuffy assembly room of Independence Hall, a group of delegates gathered. After four months of closed-door quorums, a four page, hand written document was signed by thirty-nine attendees of the Constitutional Convention. This document, has come to be considered, by many, the framework to the greatest form of government every known; the Constitution of the United States. One of the first of its kind, the Constitution laid out the frame work for the government we know today. A government of the people, by the people, and for the people; constructed of three branches; each branch charged with their own responsibilities. Article one established the Congress or Legislative branch, which would be charged with legislative powers. Article two created the Executive branch, providing chief executive powers to a president, who would act in the capacity of Commander in Chief of the Country’s military forces. The President of the United States also acts as head of state to foreign nations and may establish treaties and foreign policies. Additionally, the President and the departments within the Executive branch were established as the arm of government that is responsible for implementing and enforcing the laws written by Congress. Thirdly, under Article three of the Constitution, the Judicial branch was established, and consequently afforded the duty of interpreting the laws, determining the constitutionality of the laws, and apply it to individual cases. The separation of powers is paramount to the system of checks and balances among the three branches; however, although separate they must support the functions of the others. Because of this, the Legislative an...

    Read More

  • Era of Good Feeling

    723 Words  | 2 Pages

    Despite the downfall of the Federalist Party in the early nineteenth century, John Marshall continued to exert a strong Federalist influence on the government, which acted as a catalyst to ignite political controversy. In the McCullough vs. Maryland trial of 1819, Marshall deemed Maryland taxing the second bank of the United States as being unconstitutional, which gave even more power to the central government. (Doc D) Majority of the American population was against his ruling and refuted it because many people believed that having a strong central government was bad because if a bad decision was made, it would have affected the entire union, whereas if there was a strong state government, a bad decision would have just hurt the state. However, this was not the only time where the economy had failed in the early 1800’s. In 1816, John Randolph addressed congress and stated that it was unjust to tax the poo...

    Read More

  • The Power Struggle of the States and Federal Government in the United States

    1531 Words  | 4 Pages

    The evolution of power gained by the Federal government can be seen in the McCuloch versus Maryland (1819) case. This case des...

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson

    1167 Words  | 3 Pages

    Worchester, . "John Marshall’s Decision on Worcester v. Georgia." PBS. Community Television of Southern California, 18 Mar 2010. Web. 15 Jan 2014. .

    Read More

  • Structure of the Federal Court System

    1304 Words  | 3 Pages

    Before the adoption of the United States Constitution, the U.S. was governed by the Articles of Confederation. These articles stated that almost every function of the government was chartered by the legislature known as Congress. There was no distinction between legislative or executive powers. This was a major shortcoming in how the United States was governed as many leaders became dissatisfied with how the government was structured by the Articles of Confederation. They felt that the government was too weak to effectively deal with the upcoming challenges. In 1787, an agreement was made by delegates at the Constitutional Convention that a national judiciary needed to be established. This agreement became known as The Constitution of the United States, which explicitly granted certain powers to each of the three branches of the federal government, while reserving other powers exclusively to the states or to the people as individuals. It is, in its own words, “the supreme Law of the Land” (Shmoop Editorial Team).

    Read More

  • Judiciary as the Most Powerful Branch of Government

    2619 Words  | 6 Pages

    The reason for much of this power is the principle of judicial review of the actions of the executive and legislative branches of government at both state and federal level against a written constitution and the power therefore to 'interpret' the constitution. The power of judicial review over the states is laid down in the supremacy clause of article III and the power of judicial review over the other two branches of the federal government is implied in the constitution and by several but by no means all of the founding fathers: "A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation and validity ought, of course, to be preferred; or, in other words, the Constitution ought to be preferred to the statute, the intention of the people to the intention of thei... ... middle of paper ... ...

    Read More

  • Power Of Judicial Review: Miranda V. Arizona

    1014 Words  | 3 Pages

    The court determines whether on not an action is constitutional or not through the process of judicial review. Not only do they keep the Legislative and Executive branch in line, they keep other courts in line. Many and very few cases require the Supreme Court to review and overturn decision. Example are the Miranda v. Arizona cases where the police was in the wrong by violating Miranda’s Fifth and Sixth Amendment therefore ruling in Miranda’s favor. Also the Weeks v. United States case was an example of the Fourth and Fifth Amendment being violated was again ruling in the defendent’s favour. Finally, the Plessey v. Furguson case was a little different really displaying the courts power to interpret laws and ruling in the prosecuter’s favour. The Judicial Branch is certainly not the weakest branch and has a more important role than many people

    Read More

  • The Constitution: The Supreme Law Of The American Constitution

    1522 Words  | 4 Pages

    The power the Supreme Court has today stems from the case of Marbury v. Madison: a hearing

    Read More

  • Loving v. Virginia (388 U.S. 1)

    2066 Words  | 5 Pages

    Hall, Kermit L, eds. The Oxford guide to United States Supreme Court decisions New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.

    Read More

  • Implied Powers of Congress

    938 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are several powers expressly given to Congress in Article 1 of the constitution. These expressed powers are basically a laundry list of Congressional duties. These include, but are not limited to, the power to lay and collect taxes, the power to borrow money on behalf of the United States credit, the power to coin money and regulate it's value, the power to declare war, the power to raise and support armies, the power to establish post offices and postal roads and the power to regulate commerce between the states, as well as with the Indian tribes and with foreign nations. These powers were given at this level of government by our forefather because they are important items that must be regulated at the national level. Imagine the chaos that would ensue if each state was able to coin it's own money and set the value themselves. While Congress may be responsible for things of great importance to our security and national economy “no one of the powers transferred to the federal government is unnecessary or improper”(Federalist No.45) and“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined.” (Federalist No.45). This helps to ensure that Congress' power is k...

    Read More

  • Forensic Evidence Admissibility For or Against in the Bloodsworth v. State Case

    1944 Words  | 4 Pages

    BLOODSWORTH v. STATE, 76 Md. App. 23 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland July 8, 1988).

    Read More

  • Competitive Federalism

    2725 Words  | 6 Pages

    Heart of Atlanta v. U.S. and Katzenbach v. McClung. 2003. The Supreme Court Historical Society. 22 April 2003.

    Read More

More about McCulloch V. Maryland 1819

Open Document