Martin Luther King's Assassination Analysis

802 Words2 Pages

For many, Martin Luther King, Jr. gave rise to the Civil Rights Movement, campaigning for conversion and sought to impact race relations. However, further triumphs for the Civil Rights Movement, reduced following the year 1965. These crusades led to, vain progress, hostility and King was a constant target for segregationists, ultimately resulting in his assassination. With increasing opposition towards his methods of nonviolence, other civil rights leaders criticised King for the slow progression and deprived undertakings. Despite this, King remained persistent with transforming America, however, there were hundreds of reported threats against his life and numerous arrests. During 1961 and 1962, King was arrested twice during demonstrations, On March 28th, 1968, as King led thousands of sanitation workers on a march through downtown Memphis, this led to an outbreak of violence. King returned to Memphis for the last time on April 3rd, declaring “because I’ve been to the mountaintop and I’ve seen the Promised Land.” He continued, “I may not get there with you. But I want you to know tonight, that we, as a people, will get to the Promised Land.” The following evening the assassination took place as he stood on a balcony of the Lorraine Motel in King’s murder expressed the violence and repression of Memphis police, and the daily violence towards African Americans in America. As an outcome, widespread civil disobedience (revolts, looting, burning), was sparked in 125 cities across the country. For years, tensions had been building between King and those who his beliefs threatened. Many of King’s actions posed threats, leading to his assassination. The Watts Rebellion of poor African Americans unleashed the most violent social upheaval in America since the Civil War, during the last half of the 1960s. One summary King gave of these events was that these “riots were the voices of the unheard.” However, Martin Luther King held that this voice required to be more non-violently directed and that its message be made effective. This brought about the 1968 Poor People’s Campaign but provoked conflict and hostility towards King. Another factor that increased threats towards King, was his ambition for a whole reconstruction of “economic and political power” relationships. ‘The Powers That Be’ (TPTB) saw that not only did he recognize that, but that he had begun to utilize his international status to take actions. This posed a political threat to them and their domestic and foreign policies. This is what had King killed, and was proven by the 1999 MLK assassination

Open Document