Noor Alana Sarwar
Maria Ortega Friday 11 a.m.
Question # 2
The Free Market: A Utopia Destined for Dystopia
Since the recent Great Recession of 2007-2009, there has been increasing disillusionment with the free market system. Critically analyze the view that the free market system is the best and only realistic alternative for determining the allocation of resources in an economy.
Capitalism, in its purest sense, could well be a nearly-perfect system. The idea of free enterprise, in which a provider offers goods or services to a needy consumer, and in which supply and demand determine price is a concept that is fair to all who participate in the process. Conversely, it can also be a breeding ground for greed, allowing the more powerful to control the markets. On might argue that some greed is necessary to power the market toward producing a better product. But when human greed is allowed to corner the market through fraud and corruption, then the system works only for the few, leaving consumers with fewer and poorer quality goods or services. Therefore, regulation is required to keep the market in balance for all. It
Anarchism is known as an ideology of a different social order built on freedom, independence and unlimited by manmade law; the principle that all types of government place on violence, and are thus immoral, destructive and pointless (Goldman, 2002, pp.254). On the other hand, markets means a group of demanders and suppliers of product or service and the organization or arrangement by which they come together to trade (Hubbard et al. 2012, pp.382). In this piece of writing, this essay will argue that markets and anarchism are not incompatible, in other words, that is, markets and anarchism are compatible. In order to support the argument, this essay will discuss the similarities between anarchism and markets in relations to human nature, social
However, his views are different form Polanyi`s ideas and revolve around the power of an individual and the impact the development of market relations has on it. Thus, is his book The Road to Serfdom, Hayek tried to present his point of view on the development of planned and market economy. The author revolves around the idea that the adherence to the main concepts of planned economy will obviously lead to the development of totalitarianism and the disappearance of the freedom of an individual (Hayek n.d). He is sure that the beneficial existence of any person and society is impossible without a certain level of economical freedom provided. With this in mind, Hayek comes to the conclusion that the development of market relations could be analyzed in terms of the freedom of an individual and his/her right for
A few years before the 2008 financial crisis saw a development of the markets. This was because of the widespread view that public good, freedom and prosperity were mostly governed and influenced by markets, and not the government. There was the belief that with market mechanisms, more could be achieved within the society. However, this is not the case. Currently, the market mechanism is constantly being questioned. This is due to the realization that with the belief in the markets, the society grows to be detached from morals and other social values. This calls for action in order to change this perspective. With the markets triumphing, there is constant failure in societal morals and values. However, a crisis such as the 2008 financial crisis
"Land, labor, and capital are the essential components of a market system" (Heilbroner 33). Due to the fact that these major components were nonexistent, the market system at one time did not exist. The catalyst for the market system was the idea of gain, "which is a relatively modern idea" (H 24). There were many factors of society that prevented the market system and the idea of gain from entering. Tradition (rooted in religion) was the main factor that prolonged the nonexistence of the market system. Judging by today's times, the survival of mankind has a direct relationship with the market system.
Under this system, it allowed private economic freedom used capital and allowed the government to interfere in economic activities to achieve social aims. The price mechanism and regulated price operate will happen at the same time. The price mechanism is generally followed in consumer goods industries. When big shortage happened, prices will be controlled and public distribution system will be effective. There has both profit motive such as capitalism and social welfare. This is because public sector tries to reduce inequalities of economic and want to increase employment opportunities. Therefore, “the US economy is best described as a mixed economy, because even though it strongly advocates free market principles, it relies on the government to deal with matters that the private sector overlooks, ranging from education to the environment. The government has also helped nurture new industries and has played a role in protecting American companies from competition abroad. An example of this is the heavily subsidized agriculture industry in the US. Overall, the US has benefited from this combination”
What is a market economy? In their book named “Economics”, Mankiv and Taylor (2011) define a market economy as “an economy that allocates resources through the decentralized decisions of many firms and households as they interact in markets for goods and services” (p. 9). Nevertheless, Kantarci and Karacan (2013) have provided us with a definition that looks more into the nature of a market economy, which is a social system where cooperation and private property take place. As having the same opinion with Kantarci and Karacan, in her book “The Market System”, Lindblom (2001) states that cooperation by mutual adjustments is at the core of a market economy. He believes the market system organizes activities not through governmental planning or a central authority but through the mutual interactions among buyers and sellers.
The twentieth century ran by a mainly Keynesian system with a modern mix economy, but now its time for a change. A free market would lead to more establishments of new businesses. In addition, a free market would allow individuals to be compensated based on skills, education and experience. Lastly, the free market economic system would lower the unemployment rate. The development of a complete free market system will lead to the growth of the gross domestic product.