Man As A Political Animal Analysis

1074 Words3 Pages

This essay will aim to discuss what Aristotle proposes by the statement “man is by nature a political animal”. When looking at this question, the first thing to establish is the meaning of the word ‘political’. We must consider the fact that in the time of Aristotle the word ‘political’ was taken to mean something quite different, it was used to encompass a much wider description. In terms of the classical definition, the word political can be directly related back to the Greek word ‘polis’. The word polis can be translated into the ‘city-state’. To be political, was to involve oneself in the polis, which was the city-state. The polis is where the majority of, if not all, social activity took place and for that reason “ all social life in classical Greece was ‘political’ as it took place within the polis” (Mulgan, 1990). Aristotle maintains the idea that in order for a man to be political, he must take part in all aspects of society, not just certain political affairs.

In his book ‘The Politics’, Aristotle places great emphasis on nature and the development of everything to a positive end. He speaks about the development of nature itself into a positive end, which turns out to be the city-state. When considering the meaning of man as a political animal it is necessary to note how Aristotle arrives to the conclusion on how the city-state, in other words the polis, develops.
As previously mentioned, Aristotle places a great deal of importance on the development of things be that, plants animals etc. to a positive and natural end. And it is also in his book the politics, where he explains the natural development towards a city-state, starting off at the basic political level of the household where man and wife co habit, secondly t...

... middle of paper ...

...stotle means by the thesis that man is a political animal, is very much so valid when using the term political in the broader classical sense of the word. Man is indeed a political animal as it is impossible for human beings to survive in complete isolation and without any form of communication. It is also impossible, in terms of Aristotle, for humans to fulfil their natural development to positive ends by not participating in the activity of the polis. “ One who is incapable of participating or who is in need of nothing through being self-sufficient is no part of a city” (Lord, 1984). As mentioned earlier there have been different attempts to contradict Aristotle’s idea of man as a political animal, but it is scientifically supported that animals throughout the different species, have the capacity to be social, which in turn translates to animals being ‘political’

Open Document