Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Illegal Immigration and Its Effects on the US economy
Case analysis about ethics
Case analysis about ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Moral dilemmas always appear in our daily lives and we are the one to make the right decision. Through different trials can we solve the above dilemmas; unfortunately, the majority of them cannot be solved easily. What we can do is to find out which methods or guides are more suitable for the case. No rules can suit every situation. Therefore, moral conflict should be judged case by case since the situations are very complicated. Besides, most likely the moral dilemmas will not have the perfect solution but it still can be solved; what we can do to solve the moral conflicts is analyzing between different solutions to minimize the loss and pursuit the right value. Since you cannot predict the result of the events, there is no definite answer that determines whether your decision is right or wrong. What you have to do is achieve social justice.
I believe that moral conflict can be solved with the goal that maximizes the morality and achieves social justice. Moral conflicts should be judged case by case and do not have rules to decide which actions should be carried out. The story [1] about “Is it unfair to Buy American?” Some one argued that they help in economy and contributed a lot on infrastructure such as roads, bridges, schools and public building. That seems that those immigrate to USA contributed so much to the economy. It seems that they are beneficial to local residents. But, some opponents argued that they strain resources from the American. Some American blames on them and think they have the responsibility on the economic downturn. Those immigrants are worsen the economic downturn, increase the unemployment rate and will pull down the economy that gives negative impact to the economic development. I think it is not fai...
... middle of paper ...
...hink that they kill two innocent farmers. Both decisions will also need to feeling of regret. What to do to make the decision is follow your thought to achieve social justice.
I believe that moral conflict can be solved in most of the time. Moral conflicts have deferent points to argue with. To solve the moral conflicts, we have to analyze between different solutions to pursuit the right value and minimize the lost. There is no definite answer that determines whether your decision is right or wrong. And that is the principle we should uphold in daily life.
Works Cited
[1] Michael Sandel. (Penguin, 2009) selected paragraphs from Chapter 9 (Runaway Trolley and other examples) of Justice—What’s The Right Thing To Do?
[2] Michael Sandel. (Penguin, 2009) selected paragraphs from Chapter 1 (Runaway Trolley and other examples) of Justice—What’s The Right Thing To Do?
Justice was not served in the controversial nature of the Bernhard Goetz subway shooting trial. After shooting four black teenagers, Bernhard Goetz turned himself into the police in Concord, New Hampshire. He was denominated, “The Subway Vigilante”. This case was brought to court approximately two years later, where Bernhard Goetz would ultimately be voted guilty of one count of illegal firearms possession, and served just six months in jail. Following the trials, questions are still being asked if justice has been served.
Solberg, Muriel. “’Why Can’t We All Just Get Along?’ – Rodney King”. 27 May 2011.
An ethical dilemma is defined as a moral issue, where a situation has two equivalent undesirable alternatives and neither choice will resolve the ethical predicament.
L.E. Orr “Fitting Justice for Susan Smith?” http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/1995-08-02/news/9508020382_1_susan-smith-rough-life-carjacking Orlando Sentinel , August 2, 1995. Web. February 9,2012
Berstein, R. (2007). “Racial Discrimination or Righting Past Wrongs?” in Justice: A Reader. 237-240. Ed. Sandel, M. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 237.
The ‘Trolley Car Problem’ has sparked heated debates amongst numerous philosophical and jurisprudential minds for centuries. The ‘Trolley Car’ debate challenges one’s pre-conceived conceptions about morals, ethics and the intertwined relationship between law and morality. Many jurisprudential thinkers have thoroughly engaged with this debate and have consequentially put forward various ideologies in an attempt to answer the aforementioned problem. The purpose of this paper is to substantiate why the act of saving the young, innocent girl and resultantly killing the five prisoners is morally permissible. In justifying this choice, this paper will, first, broadly delve into the doctrine of utilitarianism, and more specifically focus on a branch
John Rawls’ theory of justice is one of the most interesting philosophies to have emerged in modern times. It was introduced in the 1970s when A Theory of Justice was published. It was revised several times, with the most recent done in the year 1999. Essentially, the Rawlsian philosophy approaches justice according to the idea of fairness. The idea is that justice is a complex concept, and it could differ according to individual circumstance. Rawls contended that all of us are ignorant about ourselves and about others and, hence, we are not in a place - in such condition - to determine or apply the principles of justice. These positions allowed Rawls to address two contemporary issues that are equally important, but also tend oppose each other’s views: freedom and equality.
I talked about this assignment with several people, probing their minds for a moral perspective and to see what the moral majority thought about the careening trolley and the dilemma; and received as many different answers to the question is it morally permissible for you to turn the trolley as the number of people I spoke to.
Rawls states that you cannot reimburse for the sufferings of the distressed by enhancing the joys of the successful. Fairness according to him occurs when the society makes sure that every individual is treated equally before the law and given a c...
This Critical Essay Builds Upon the Concepts of Rawls and King to Examine the Potential for Justice in America
Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
More often than not, a person will encounter themselves in a difficult and problematic situation. Life is not a walk in the park when it comes to making decisions. Making choices may not be feasible when under pressure and stress. Ideally, this applies to those choices that are not black and white. In relation, this is where a person's morality comes into play which reveals their
Some of the deficiencies in the way cultural relativism addresses moral problems, according to Holmes; are that they remain impractical, they are subject to change depending on where you live, and that people tolerate the different cultures. As a professional business person, I agree with Holmes analysis. Allowing others perceptions or beliefs to get away with our own personal beliefs would be contradicting ourselves. It is important to stand up for our beliefs, and help educate others on ethical issues. Over time we can make a difference in the world by modeling moral beliefs and ethics.
Thomson, Judith J. "The Trolley Problem." The Yale Law Journal 94.6 (1985): 1395-415. JSTOR. Web. 20 Jan. 2009.
John Rawls’ Justice as fairness attempts to both define the principles typical of justice and describe what a just society would necessary entail by the conception presented. What is described is not a perfectly good society, as justice is but one virtue among many, but a just one. Specifically, Rawls’ conception is that justice and fairness are one in the same. Using this as a starting point, Rawls focuses foremostly on the practices in a society, rather than any individual action. In this way, he expounds on what is meant by the term fairness and what value that term has in explaining justice. In this paper of three parts, I will first describe Rawls position on justice, including this position’s main principles. Secondly, I will examine