Magerella Argumentative Analysis

568 Words2 Pages

In 1998 a British gastroenterologist, Andrew Wakefield publishes a paper in The Lancet proposing that the MMR vaccine caused intestinal inflammation that led to movement of peptides, in the GI tract, to the blood stream and eventually the brain; where they affected development. (Gerber and Offit) He based this off of his observation of 8 children that displayed symptoms of Autism spectrum Disorder (ASD) along with gastrointestinal discomfort 1 month after getting the meales-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine. After a spike in ASD diagnoses this article gained traction with concerned parents looking for something to blame. As it turns out Wakefield’s proposal was wrong for a few reasons. First his research had no control subjects, GI symptoms have never been associated with MMR vaccines, and the traveling peptide has never been identified. …show more content…

A study performed by scientists at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2007 showed that mercury in vaccines did not cause even subtle signs or symptoms of mercury poisoning. (Gerber and Offit) Also the symptoms of autism and mercury poisoning are vastly different. The American Academy of Pediatrics reviewed multiples studies related to link between thimerosal, mercury, methylmercury, and ethylmercury. The evidence reviews in the studies reviewed showed that there is no association between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism It is well documented that unfounded concerns about vaccine safety can result in decreases in vaccination rates, subsequent disease outbreaks, and inefficient and ineffective utilization of scarce financial and research resources. (Parker, Schwartz and

More about Magerella Argumentative Analysis

Open Document