Madela Rugby Vs Temple Grandin

1020 Words3 Pages

An Art and an Industry: Temple Grandin Versus Nelson Madela Rugby Temple Grandin and Invictus: Nelson Mandela Rugby are two true to life—outstanding and exceptional films. However, as a member of the Academy Awards Committee, only one of two I will vote to be the first-rate overall "Best Film." The Temple Grandin is autobiographical of a woman who is autistic icon— a high functioning autistic woman who become very popular on advocating humane slaughtering practices, and became an expert on animal husbandry. On the movie "Temple Grandin," she begun to show her interest and establish a brilliance for all mechanical things. In spite of her disability "Autism," Grandin attended college and upswings intellectually and become an innovator in the …show more content…

Temple Grandin film takes a completely new approach to autism. Predominantly, the film grabs my mind and expands it for I am one of many that are unfamiliar with the disorder. It also allows me to experience the remarkable, but at the same time challenging life of Temple Grandin. Clair Danes is fantastic and brings strong emotions when displaying the biographical character of Grandin. Strongly, the film accurately captures what it is like for me, at least to be an autistic. Autism is extremely diverse, and what is true for one autistic will not be true for all. It almost feels like this movie is something I can proudly show to my friends and family that are never expose to the remarkable and positive side of autism. In the same way, Nelson Mandela film is expose me to a great sense of leadership. I am able comprehend the qualities of a good leader, and how effective Nelson Mandela as a leader. On the film, Mandela inspire his team not to be intimidated by the challenges, instead be thrill of the challenges. Impressively, Mandela uses charm and friendliness is more effective than direct confrontation. By treating "adversaries" with the same respect I will treat my friends, so I can gain their trust and hopefully theor loyalty. On the contrary, the film has some situations that are full of contradictions and competing interests. Although, every problem has many causes and many …show more content…

Popular art forms, such as film that has special importance because film speak to the most central of values and beliefs. Temple Grandin has outstanding performance—a fascinating true story, and fine production values all around. Ultimately, the film not only changed the face of the livestock industry, she also changed the face of autism. Conceptually, in a rapid changing world where complexity is changing day by day, the film has taken me to see Temple’s life and character is an inspirational and the lessons of her life can apply to anyone across the board that are suffering from autism and found no hope for a better—more normal and adaptable—life to live by. Comparatively, Nelson Mandela movie conquers the concept of "Nothing is black or white" in life. In other words, Life is never either/or. Nothing is ever as straightforward as it appears; every problem has many causes. Mandela's perception was always, "What is the end that I seek, and what is the most practical way to get there?" The man that gave birth to his country and refused to hold it hostage. Mandela knows that a leader lead as much by what the leader choose not to do as what he

Open Document