Lykurgos and Solon, the lawgivers of Sparta and Athens, passed distinct legislations in their attempt to save their poleis from destruction; Solon established a state solely based on wealth, whereas Lykurgos founded a nation of absolute equality and justice within Sparta, making Lykurgos the more effective reformer. Sparta, under the verge of economical bankruptcy, nearly fell to destruction. Government in corruption, army in crumble, and slaves in uprisings gave Lykurgos the chance to save the state from panicking. Athens, on the other hand, suffered from an extreme inequality between the rich and poor, stimulating an outrage of civil war. Facing these problems, Lykurgos and Solon responded differently in their endeavor to rescue their state permanently, which then eventually proved that Lykurgos’ reforms were more effective and long-lasting.
In order to save Sparta from destruction and corruption, Lykurgos passed reforms to evict humanness out of every single Spartan and to pass down values of obedience to their posterities. Corruption, in his beliefs, led to destruction of the government and it was an inevitable part of the humanness. However, through Lykurgos’ reforms, he successfully made the Spartans corruption-free. “Spartan education... turns out men more obedient, more respectful and more strictly temperate,” ( Xenophon, Lac. , 2.12). His education eliminated human sluggishness as well as their pompous virtues; it also evicted their humanness and greed of appetites towards superfluous luxuries. Requiring the children to wear no sandals and starve, he engraved the ideas of obedience and sacrifice into the children. They were taught since young to sacrifice on the behalf of the state, and their only reason of appearance t...
... middle of paper ...
...person, he cancelled all debts, public and private,” (Aristotle, Ath., 6). Instead of seeing the poor incapable to pay for the debts and being forcefully enslaved, Solon decided to eliminate all the current debts for the poor and forbade all the loans secured on the person. Cancelling all the current debts and forbidding future loans, Solon relieved the poor greatly from social and economical pressure. The poor no longer had to yield under the rich and their rights as citizens were raised significantly in the Athenian society. However, Solon’s reforms was a mere compromise; gratifying neither the desires of the rich nor the poor. Refusing to redistribute the land, the poor still lacked a source of income and suffered from the impertinence of his reforms. Compared to Lykurgos, Solon’s reforms were less effective and did not resolve Athen’s issues permanently.
The governments of these two city-states were not alike in many ways. “It is true that our government is called a democracy, because its administration is in the hands, not of the few, but of the many,” (Document 3). Athens’ government was what we would consider today a direct democracy. This means that their government was run by the people, or in other words “the many”, rather than a couple government officials, or “the few”. Although Athens was running their city as a government by the people, Sparta had a different form of government. “it is made up of oligarchy, monarchy, and democracy,
“No man ever proves himself a good man in war unless he can endure to face the blood and the slaughter, go against the enemy and fight with his hands.” The preceding was quoted from “The Spartan creed” by the poet Tyrtaeus. There are two authors in this primary resource reading which include Tyrtaeus as well as Xenophon, whom authored “The laws and customs of the Spartans”. These two works give great detail to the Spartan society. As history has presented it, Sparta was a smaller polis and yet was one of the most, if not most, influential societies in history. What we know of this culture comes to us from excavation of its heritage as well as literary works such as these. But are these “eyes” into history factual and creditable enough to base our own interpretations of such a masterful race? These writings are great resources for Spartan’s war enhanced values and societal customs, but lack in evidence of governmental affairs and religion. This lacking may have been due to both writer’s motives for their work.
Within the Spartan society, religion mirrored their values and ethics of a militaristic state, being physical strength and social cohesion. However, the absolute necessity to appease their gods and goddess through festivals and the religious roles of the kings reflects the society’s obligation to religion over everything. Funerary customs and rituals reflect that dying for the state was of uttermost importance correlating with the Spartans values and ethics ultimately giving prominence to religion being the fundamental aspect of
In an attempt to promote justice and equality, Lycurgus and Solon fostered political, social, and economic reformations in their cities. Lycurgus instituted elders, redistributed land, made currency worthless, and established common messes. Lycurgus created a strictly equal city. However, it limited Sparta as a whole to advance. On the other hand, Solon works to resolve this problem in Athens by creating fairness for people with different upbringing. Solon allotted political privilege according to wealth instead of lineage, abolished slavery, and wiped the poor’s slate of debt clean. To alleviate social injustice, Lycurgus promoted strict equality while Solon understands socioeconomic inequalities are inevitable and still attempts to even out the playing field so that each person has the agency to advance.
At around 800 BC, a young man named Lycurgus was in line for the throne of Sparta, but due to some complications, he did not become king. However, the Spartan people loved him and wanted him to help their nation. As the king was his nephew, he became in some way the king’s advisor, yet he had a great deal more impact and control over the Spartans than the king himself. He wanted his nation to be a strong nation, and he wanted them to rely on themselves rather than another country. Bit by bit, he shaped Sparta into a nation like no other of
Sparta was a strict military city-state. The people were Dorians who conquered Laconia. This region lies in the Peloponnesus, which lied in southern Greece. The invaders turned the conquered people into state owned slaves, called helots. Since the helots greatly outnumbered their rulers, Spartans established a strict and brutal system of control. The Spartan government had two kings and a council of elders who advised the monarchs. An assembly made up of all citizens approved all major decisions. From child-hood, a Spartan prepared to be part of the military. All newborn were examined and the healthy lived and the sickly were left to die. Spartans wanted future soldiers or mothers of soldiers to be healthy. At the age of seven, boys trained for a lifetime in the Spartan military. They moved to the barracks and endured brutal and extensive training.
The early Greek poleis served as way of uniting citizens under a centralized government. Under the Athenian and Spartan government, the people had more rights and, opportunities within society, which were governed by a set constitution. The constitution or politeia operated within individual poleis to identify ideas and values that would distinguish one city-state from another. For example, in Sparta, the Rhetra acted as the foundation to how society was structured. These were a set of laws that were established and implemented by Lykourgos, which formed the new government system through a combination of different elements from all the politeiai; namely oligarchy, monarchy and democracy . The Rhetra played a role in regulating the process of law and policy making, and also governing the educati...
It is amazing that the leaders of Athens would trust their citizens, albeit a select few, to make decisions and choices about their life style. It is also incredible to contemplate the discipline required to establish a military force when Sparta had no physical infrastructure to fortify their city-state. It is important to respect our past and learn from it. However, we also must recognize the limitations and not romanticize the past to the point we ignore its shortcomings and not forget that it took nearly 2000 years to abolish slavery. These ancient city-states neglected a large number of their people, and approved of slavery and the subjugation of women. As long as one class dominates and discriminates against another, as a world society, we still have work to do to ensure peace and basic freedoms for all of
... educated Athenian youth-the natural leaders of the postwar generation-refused to take any role in public affairs, or showed their rejection of the traditional way of life by antisocial activities of all kinds: excessive drinking, sexual looseness, squandering wealth, idleness. The reaction of the older generation was kind of backlash against freedom and democracy. This conflict was to last until the end of the fourth century when Athenian democracy was dead, and with it the respect for reason, the ancient civic humanism.”
The one thing we know for certain about Spartan society is that we don’t know much about it. Very few documents and artifacts about the Spartans have been discovered, but the ones that have tell us everything we know. Two of these works are Plutarch’s On Sparta and Xenophon’s Spartan Society. One of the main things these two accounts focused on was the Lycurgan reforms. Through their stories and writings Plutarch and Xenophon had both some similarities and differences when talking about the political, economic, militaristic, and social reforms. One of the main differences when comparing these two writings is how Plutarch gives a historical account of Spartan society and tries to keep objectivity
As can be expected from pioneer governmental institutions, Athenian democracy was not perfect. In fact it was far from it. It resulted in the establishment of poor policies by aggressive populists who sought "...private ambition and private profit...which were bad both for the Athenians themselves and their allies." (Thucydides). These self interested populist leaders with personal gain in mind established extensive internal political instability "...by quarrelling among themselves [and] began to bring confusion into the policy of the state." (Thucydides). Repeated opportunities to accept terms of peace after the battles of Pylos (425), Arginusae (406) and Aegospotami (405) were ignored by the inefficient Athenian demos eventually resulting in the devastation of the once dominant city-state. Internal political strife can also be attribu...
In Classical Sparta, the agoge, was a successful education method as it bred discipline and fear into the future homoioi. Fear benefited the Spartan polis due to the fact that it created unquestionable obedience to authority. Plutarch expressed how that, ‘Where there is fear, there is also a sense of respect’ (Plutarch, Cleomenes). At the age of seven, the young Spartans started their agoge training, a paidonomos was placed in consistent supervision of the boy and was able to punish them when they felt necessary (Webb, 2012). Furthermore, the paidonomos was assisted by a young man, aged around 18-20, called an eirenes. The eirenes carried a whip around with them, able to chastise students for any misbehaviour (Amos and Lang, 1979), this was effective as it further created more fear, which lead to a higher respect for those older than them.
The march towards developing a democratic society is often obstructed with societal unrest due to the influence of the status quo on the instruments of power. Before the rule of Solon, Athens underwent this same rule, as there was much discontent among the social classes in Athens. The society suffered financial disparity that often was the trigger for the war among the rich and poor in the society. This was a major factor that forced Solon into power to institute policies that would see a reformed Athens. By so doing, the society was looking for an avenue that would guarantee democracy and a society that is fair for everyone. The city-state of Athens was the epicenter of the revolution for the Athenian democracy during the fifth century BC. In the Athenian democracy, the electorate voted for the legislation of bills instead of a direct democracy where the electorates are tasked with electing representatives who later developed the bill. Among the first people who made significant contributions to the development of the Athenian democracy were Solon (594 BC), Cleisthenes (508/7 BC), Pericles (495 – 429 BC) and Ephialtes (462 BC). Pericles was the longest serving democratic leader who contributed much development in democracy in the city. This paper will give an account of the age of the Pericles.
Archidamus highlights the four main Spartan ideals to be shame, self-control, good judgment, and moderation. He attempts to connect to this to the theme of courage by talking of it’s antonym; cowardice, “Let no one think that the many do not immediately attack a single city because of cowardice,” (Thucydides, History, 1.83). He outlines the consequences to a city of not being sufficiently courageous as being more susceptible to attack and defeat. The idea of self-control comes into play as one controls themselves regarding the shame they feel before others,
Because of the tranquil times, the civilization’s society had more time to focus on writing, math, astronomy, and artistic fields, as well as trade and metallurgy. Out of all the city-states of Greece, two excelled over all the rest, Sparta and Athens. Even though they were the most advanced and strong civilizations, they were bitter enemies. While Athens focused mainly on the people’s democracy and citizen rights, Sparta were ferocious and enslaved its original inhabitants, making them unable to leave and kept under a close eye to prevent insurgence (History of Greece:The Golden Age of Greece). Additionally, Sparta had strict and trained soldiers that underwent intense physical exercising and instruction.