Lorax And Easter Island Comparison Essay

The Lorax and Easter Island are similar and different in many ways. First of all, an obvious difference is that one is fictional and the other is reality. Even though this is true they both have a lesson to be taken away from them. To begin with, the Lorax and Easter Island have many differences but the most obvious one is that in the Lorax one person/thing (the onceler) was responsible for the destruction and the depletion of a resource. Unlike the Lorax a whole generation of people led to the destruction and depletion of many resources, and not just one individual profited from the exploitation but a whole species of people did. In the Lorax you can see that the onceler used the truffula trees for economic purposes. He got filthy rich from the exploitation. Whereas, in Easter Island a whole group of people benefited from it, they build pyramids, cut down trees to build temples, and depleted the land of all its natural sources.

In The Lorax, the trees produce a fabric that could be used on anything and everything. With all the resources of trees gone the species that once were dependent on it were forced to migrate elsewhere. Their population did not become extinct. Something that caught my eye about the people on Easter Island was that exploiting their resources was part of their culture. They used up their resources to build and they went overboard with it. At one point they could’ve realized that they had enough statues/monuments and left the land fallow to regain its nutrients. Unlike the Lorax, once the people of Easter Island ran out of its resources and were not able to hunt for food they resulted to cannibalism. This would later lead to human extinction on the