Literary Criticism Of John Knowles A Separate Peace

862 Words2 Pages

At the beginning of the literary criticism, it discusses how the book, A Separate Peace, began growing in popularity through the 1900’s. The book was first published by Secker and Wanderburg in London, England (Alton). Its sales drastically went up after it won the William Faulkner Foundation Award (Alton). After that, many teachers wanted A Separate peace to replace the classic, Catcher and the Rye, due to the profanity found in the latter (Alton). After that, the various authors in the literary criticism discuss the praises and criticisms they have of the plot and characters in A Separate Peace. The first praise comes from David Holborn. He discusses how the flashback technique used at the beginning of the novel helps draw the reader …show more content…

The second positive criticism comes from Anne Alton. She stated that the characterization in the novel was incredible. The main characters’ names weren’t just names; they each had meanings behind them that went along with their character and their actions. She uses Finny as an example; Phineas, who was son of Aaron in the Bible, was a judge; Finny is constantly judging Gene throughout the novel. Though there are many praises for A Separate Peace, there are also many criticisms. One criticism from Alton is how in depth the author, Knowles, goes in parts of the story. It distracts the reader from the main plot and is usually giving the reader unnecessary information (Alton). Alton also mentions how the minor characters, excluding Leper and Brinker, are weak and underdeveloped. Alton states that they are merely “stock characters”; they are just there to fill the gaps in the novel and don’t contribute to or change the overall plot (Alton). Another criticism is how unreliable Gene’s narrative becomes as the story progresses. We only see Finny and the other characters how Gene does; since we don’t have an outside point of view, and Gene changes his mind about how he feels about Finny multiple times throughout the story, it is hard to differentiate which qualities and statements are true …show more content…

For starters, Alton was correct when he stated that Gene’s narratives were unreliable. Since the story was told from Gene’s point of view, we had no outside opinions of the characters (Alton). For example, the scene where Finny falls out of the tree is very confusing at points. Gene contradicts himself multiple times. When the accident first happened, he states that he did indeed jounce the limb, but in Leper’s mock-trial later in the book, he denies jouncing the limb many times. This is just one of the many examples of this happening throughout the book (Alton). Mengeling was also correct when he stated that there is not only a world war happening on the surface, but there is also a war happening between Gene and Finny. For starters, Gene is in a constant competition with Finny no matter what he does. He even states in his own words that Finny is “too good to be true” (Mengeling). He breaks the swimming record simply because he was challenged to do so. He never studied and somehow managed to get good grades throughout the year. Gene was constantly having to compete with that, even though he knew that he couldn’t. The war started off as a conflict between Finny and Gene, but throughout the book, subsided as Gene’s internal war took over. Gene realized that if he couldn’t beat Finny in anything, he would become Finny. He started to dress like Finny and copy his actions. Finny only encouraged

Open Document