The nature of human communication requires that only a certain number of details may be expressed. A photograph leaves out what is beyond its frame, statistical data generalizes answers into categories to make results meaningful, and words distinguish between specific concepts to present ideas. The author of a written work chooses the details to express not only what they want, but how they want the audience to feel about it. I will analyze what the author chooses to include and to ignore in The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky and “Hills Like White Elephants” by Ernest Hemmingway.
The first and more easily recognizable choice that Chbosky makes in his writing style is to tell the story in letter format, including introductions and dates. He conveniently leaves out and changes names, and refuses to give any real indication of who he is writing to or why he is writing other than him “need[ing] to know there is someone out there who will listen” (2). This is done to make the fiction come alive and to sound probable in spite of it being fiction. By having Charlie write directly to the audience and framing them as caring, “look[ed] to for strength and friendship”, and generally nice, it gives the reader the role of intimately empathizing with the character in spite of the fictional and widely publicized nature of the book (2). Charlie approaches his letters with a normal letter writing style by always referring to himself in the first person, writing erratic plot structures, and starting his letters off with questions like “I never told you I was in shop class, did I?” or with a development in something he described in an earlier letter(12). Without this opening section and the author’s reinforcing of the reader’s rol...
... middle of paper ...
...of his surroundings and past, while leaving out any other perspectives or any deep judgments of character, making Charlie seem alienated, surface level observant, and non judgmental-as if he cannot act on the things he discovers. Charlie comes across to the audience as thoughtful, disturbed, and good natured, although naïve. Hemmingway, on the other hand includes relatively insignificant details about the surroundings of his scene while including really metaphorical conversation topics in the bulk of his work. He excludes obvious portrayals of intent or any wide ranging conclusions. This makes Hemmingway’s story seem vague and hard to follow while not seeming to say anything really definite at all. Both stories show a unique way of handling what they want to express while maintaining separate and distinct choices of what kind of details matter and which do not.
In a well-written short story, different literary elements and terms are incorporated into the story by the author. Ernest Hemingway frequently uses various literary elements in his writing to entice the reader and enhance each piece that he writes. In Hills Like White Elephants, Hemingway uses symbols to teach the reader certain things that one may encounter during daily life. Symbolism may be defined as relating to, using, or proceeding by means of symbols (Princeton). The use of symbols in Hills Like White Elephants is utterly important to the plot line and to the fundamental meaning of the story. Through this use of symbolism, the reader can begin to reveal the hidden themes in this short story.
Owens and Sawhill use pathos to evoke the feelings of their readers. This method establishes
This event is really a great impact because during that entire process, it shows the building and enduring relationship, bonding, and supporting between both siblings. Besides from the strengthening of their brotherhood, the mentioning of this event is totally important due to the fact that it shows how Candace’s level of maturity develops and grows more and more. It shows how Candace changes through the whole process, it shows how she can act and think like a responsible and mature person. It shows the main point of Chbosky’s objective in this novel. The next difference is not a great impact that affected a bit the movie, but is necessary to mention it; some sequences in the movie, most of them, were mix up and combined like two or three events altogether. This didn’t much affect the audience just that it doesn’t give a clear image of what the author wants to project. Next, the presence of Charlie`s brother wasn’t as constant or noticeable as in the book, the lack of his presence in Charlie`s life in the movie really affects the plot where it would have had make a difference if it was mentioned. The presence of his brother is important because he was the one who taught Charlie self-defense and he was the one who really help him out of his tiny depression after Michael`s death. During this time, Charlie got to fortify his relationship with his brother more like he did with his sister during the pregnancy`s entire
Our daily lives emotionally affect us as individual persons in society. What happens in our daily life, changes our emotional life and changes our perspective towards life. Society has an impact on individual persons. According to The Catcher in The Rye and The Perks of Being a Wallflower; what happens to Holden and Charlie at school, at home and with their friend relationships affect them negatively and complicates their perspective towards life. Both Holden and Charlie are affected negatively by the society. Their emotional life is shaped by their social lives as like as ours.
There is a never ending list of what makes some people amazing story tellers. Some writers have vast imaginations, other writers use the lives of others in their stories and other writers use their lived experiences in order to write moving works of art. Most books, works of poetry and short stories that revolve around lived experiences share a common theme of love, hate or both. As these are emotions that all humans share, However, there are some stories that have far more unique. Stories like “The Things They Carried” by Tim O’Brien and “Hills Like White Elephants” by Ernest Hemingway. Both O’Brien and Hemingway come from two completely separate walks of life but were both able to write stories using the same theme of emotional and physical
Pike, Gerald. “Excerpts from Criticism of the Works of Short Fiction Writers.” Short Story Criticism. Ed. Thomas Votteler. Vol. 6. Detroit: Gale Research International Limited, 1990. 90. Print.
Roger Angell 's "Over the Wall" is a memoir that he wrote about his wife that she passed away, leaving him alone in this world. The memoir is filled with his experience with his wife and his feelings towards his wife. When he starts talking about his wife, he realized that people whom he knew no longer lives in this world. Roger Angell made the readers imagine he is in front of them and talking about his personal experience. He wanted us to know that people that we love is gone in the blink of an eye. Literary nonfiction form of his memoir shows the readers that he missed his wife, but grief won 't help anything. “Over the wall” is an emotional story, as it reaches out to us with few deep messages of loneliness, feelings, and memories.
The sympathy for Cholly evoked in The Bluest Eye from the reader is not deserved. By definition, sympathy means feeling pity or sorrow for the distress of another, or compassion. The skillfulness of the author manipulates the reader into feeling a certain way towards particular characters. Sympathy for characters – Cholly being no exception – derives from an author’s ability to use words and the construction of the story to lead a reader into a certain emotional direction. The reader is the prime reason the author constructs a story. Because all authors are completely aware that an audience exists for their stories, authors are, in turn, completely aware that their words can manipulate their readers. It is this awareness that allows all sentence structures and idea portrayal to be the product of an author’s manipulation. Because there exists an audience, there exists someone to persuade or influence. Thus, an author, like Morrison, builds a textual relationship between the characters in her story and that of the reader digesting her story. Morrison, like all authors, understands that the reader searches for a...
Typically a story begins with an exposition, which introduces the characters, setting and plot. In the short story ?Popular Mechanics? by Raymond Carver, the exposition is excluded. The story begins with a short rise in action, moves quickly to the climax and totally omits the resolution. Carver uses third person objective narration to reveal the actions and the dialogue between a man and a woman. The narrator gives very little descriptive details, never revealing the characters? thoughts or their motivation. This allows the reader the freedom to interpret and develop their own opinions of the setting, plot, and characters of the story. This also stimulates the reader to be an active reader?to think about what is read, to ask questions, and to respond to the authors? style of writing.
“....And in that moment, I swear we were infinite.” (Chbosky) The thoughts of a teenager are odd things, and even more odd are the thoughts of fifteen year old Charlie, the best friend of a boy who committed suicide. Charlie has been through a lot in his life, and during the book he goes through even more.
... reader. Throughout the book, Charlie unfolds secrets and truths about the world and the society that he lives in; secrets and truths that cause him to grow up and transition into adulthood. He also makes a life changing decision and rebelled against was he thought was the right thing. This reflects his maturity and bravery throughout the journey he travels that summer. Charlie eyes suddenly become open to the injustice that the town of Corrigan demonstrates. He also comes to face the issue of racism; not only shown towards his best friend Jeffrey and the Lu family but to Jasper Jones as well. He realises the town of Corrigan is unwilling to accept outsiders. Charlie not only finds out things that summer about the people that surround him, but he also finds out who he is personally.
..., the use of literary techniques including irony, characterization and theme convey the author’s purpose and enhance Into The Wild. The author accomplished his purpose of telling the true story of Chris McCandless. He was an eccentric, unpredictable man that led a very interesting life. His life deserved a tribute as truthful and respectful as Jon Krakauer’s. Through his use of literary techniques, the author creates an intense, and emotional piece of literature that captures the hearts of most of its readers. Irony, characterization, and theme all play a vital role in the creation of such a renowned work of art. “Sensational…[Krakauer] is such a good reporter that we come as close as we probably ever can to another person’s heart and soul” (Men’s Journal).
While societal attitudes attitudes may change over time, the challenges associated with the transition from childhood to adulthood remain constant. The ideas of individuality, alienation and loss of innocence fortify the theme of coming of age across the texts The Catcher in the Rye and The Perks of Being a Wallflower. The Catcher in the Rye, a bildungsroman novel written by J.D. Salinger in 1951, focuses on teenager Holden Caulfield’s transition from childhood to adulthood in 1950’s America, whereas the film The Perks of Being a Wallflower directed by Stephen Chbosky in 2012 follows teenager Charlie experiencing a similar transition in 1990’s America. Despite their varying contexts, these ideas are presented in both texts through the use the
A typical story is littered with details, explaining the history of the world the story takes place in, who the characters in the story are, all the while remaining correlated to the plot and subplots that drive the story forward. The story The Lottery by Shirley Jackson however does not follow these conditions, as the reader is left to interpret a majority of the story on their own as it progresses. Jackson is not the only writer to incorporate a style of selective exposition in their work; Raymond Carver is widely recognized for his rejection of explanation and the use of characters that do not always communicate with one another, both of which are elements which Jackson incorporates into her own story. Initially, a lack of exposition may seem detrimental to the story, but instead it plays to the “mysterious nature of story” according to Charles E. May in his essay ‘Do You See What I’m Saying?’: The Inadequacy of Explanation and the uses of Story in the Short Fiction of Raymond Carver. Therefore, by refusing to expound upon setting, characters, and plot allows the author to create mystery, and the reader to form their own interpretations of the story.
The thing that makes, Hills Like White Elephants, by Ernest Hemingway such a powerful story is the subtlety with which it is told. Hemingway is commenting on subject matter which for the time would have been considered taboo, but does so without actually spelling it out for the reader. As the characters sit together drinking beer and talking, it becomes immediately apparent that there is something weighty between them and as the conversation continues, the reader can feel pressure building between the two of them. At this point, the source of the tension could be anything and the reader follows along expecting not only some kind of outburst between the man and the American girl, but also to find out what has caused the rift.