Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Liberalism definition in own words essay
Liberalism definition in own words essay
Torture in human rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The liberalism of fear is a reply to these undeniable actualities, which in the process focuses on damage control. Our ever growing fear of domination by the state, continues to play a role in why Americans continue to revolt against authority, or even local governments. The practices of torture use to be have been eliminated years ago from the practiced of government institutions. There was big hope for the future that practice of torture tactics would eventually stop everywhere. But, in recent times the public has been able to see declassified documents that involve tourture procedures still prevalent in todays tactics. For example, as of yesterday the Senate Intelligence committee released a 500 page report on the tactics the CIA, have been using to interrogate prisoners after the 9/11 attacks.
The liberalism of fear is modeled upon a antagonistic model of self and state. The state contrived as some non entity beyond the self individual thus the interests of the state may come to encroach in the particular inhabitants interests. In this model, the state may be deemed a particular adversary, in which the citizen may have to keep control. The individual should always be empowered to look through the liberties the state has given them. Once
…show more content…
Cruelty could be any act of physical or emotional pain upon a weak person in order to achieve some type of end. Though public cruelty is has not been seen as a occasional inclination in the average minds of white Americans , it has moved to be build into the social aspects of young males in minority communities of color. Though the liberalism fear knows that they will not be able to end coercive government, the fear it’s striving to prevent unnecessary, acts of forced. In addition prevent acts of torture, or presuaives act of cruelty preformed by agents in any regime (military, police,
Cruelty is callous indifference to or pleasure to causing pain and suffering. Cruelty can be measured in different ways from taking a child's toy or bombing another country, but is there any reason why people commit these cruel acts. In Cormac McCarthy’s The Road a catastrophic event has happened causing an apocalypse where many people have died, animals are extinct, and the soil is now infertile. This causes the humans to perform cruel acts in order to survive, but are these acts really cruel? People in The Road execute atrocious acts of cruelty in the aspiration of surviving, but do people’s morals affect their acts of cruelty.
In this essay, I posit that despite the harsh clashes between liberalism and republicanism, both elements play important roles in American politics, and their marriage has given birth to a unique America. I will begin by giving brief explanations about liberalism and republicanism, before showing how their dynamic interaction has given rise to American exceptionalism. It is also important to note that the slight emphasis on liberalism more than republicanism that is also evident in the US Constitution.
""The Art of Cruelty"" The New York Times Book Review, 31 July 2011. Web. 27 Nov. 2011.
People say that fear is the cap that prevents people from doing great things. Although, most people in the world can overcome, most who fail end up worse than they were originally. 1984, the story is about Wilson and his journey to try and overcome the fear set by the rulers, the party. Through the use of surveillance and thought prevention in “1984,” George Orwell demonstrates that the most effective form of control is fear.
In the article, “The Torture Myth,” Anne Applebaum explores the controversial topic of torture practices, focused primarily in The United States. The article was published on January 12, 2005, inspired by the dramatic increase of tensions between terrorist organizations and The United States. Applebaum explores three equality titillating concepts within the article. Applebaum's questions the actual effectiveness of using torture as a means of obtaining valuable information in urgent times. Applebaum explores the ways in which she feels that the United States’ torture policy ultimately produces negative effects upon the country. Applebaum's final question is if torture is not optimally successful, why so much of society believes it works efficiently.
Throughout the course, the ideologies that resonated with me most are conservatism and parts of liberalism. I can see how the way I live and view things are similar to the ideologies present in these readings. Furthermore, I can greatly relate to the concepts and definition presented in these readings, as liberalism and conservatism are two major political ideologies not just in the U.S., but also in many other parts of the world. The readings on these subject have challenged today's view of the two ideologies.
Given the research conducted for this essay, and the articles provided, it is indeed clear that we are headed in the direction of an autocracy, both in terms of technology, politics, and law. As terrorist groups continue to conspire and carry out attacks across the world, we are only growing ever more desperate, believing that our government will save us, or that we must be more aggressive towards our enemies to keep ourselves safe. Yet, we naturally fail to realize that more aggression only leads to more hatred towards us, thus, more members of terrorist groups, thus, a greater need for government control. If we wish to stop the “birth of Big Brother”, as seen in”1984” we must aid countries in need of supplies, instead of helping them, and,
In the words of Bertrand Russell, “Fear is the main source of superstition, and one of the main sources of cruelty. To conquer fear is the beginning of wisdom” (Russell). Fear causes many problems in our lives. Fear influences many of a person’s actions and decisions. However, people usually regret the decisions or actions they made out of fear. Also, these actions and decisions can cause problems for those people in their future. Fear is a harmful emotion, for it clouds people’s judgement, disables them from taking action, and causes them to make decisions that they will regret later.
The notion that fear will make a human leak information is not a novel idea. Torture has widely been used throughout the world by many groups of people. After World War II, The Geneva Convention prohibited any nation from partaking in torture. The emergence of terrorist activity on American soil brought up the question whether torture should be advocated or prohibited from a moral standpoint. The US changed the definition of torture in order to forcibly attain potentially important information from captives. Even though the new clause suggested that many of the methods the US used were now legal, other countries still had an issue in terms of honoring the Geneva Convention and basic human rights. Advocates for torture promise that countless innocent lives can be saved from the information obtained from a single torture victim. Opponents to the advocates suggest that torture often results in misleading information. Morally, torture is not justified as it degrades humans and often leaves victims scarred for life and possibly dead.
After the terrorist attacks of September 11th 2001, terrorism has come to the forefront of the American picture. Levin published his essay in 1982, at a time when terrorism was something that was feared, but not at the intense level that it is currently. One of the main reasons Levin advocates for torture is that thinks that it will help, “...for preventing future evils” (689). Before terrorism was rampant in the world, this idea may have held some merit. If, after smaller attacks, terrorists were tortured, they may have given away information that would have been viable for preventing future, more detrimental attacks. Nowadays torturing a terrorist may have more consequences than benefits. Attacks nowadays are set up by large, intricate, dangerous groups of terrorists. So, if a member of one of these terrorist groups was tortured, that may make the groups want to retaliate even more strongly. Essentially, torturing a terrorist may perpetuate more hatred for the target country. Another point Levin makes is that, “The name of their [the terrorists] game is public recognition” (690). He explains how one of the main motives behind terrorism is being as infamous as possible by, for example, being on every news broadcast or newspaper. The idea of public recognition being a motivation for terrorism is something that did make sense in 1982, but in today’s technologically advance world, this feat is less than a goal and almost a guarantee. With the rise of social media, getting publicly recognized is not something very difficult to do. News spreads like wildfire; so if a terrorist has plans to do anything remotely damaging, and is able to carry it out, it will most likely garner some media attention. Although some of Levin’s points had credibility during the time when his essay was published, they are not contemporary enough to be applicable to
"The Power of Fear." Revolution Now! Revolution Now!, 03 Mar. 2011. Web. 02 Apr. 2014.
A tall man in a long black coat is seen walking past the window of an elementary school with a large brief case. That sentence is enough to make almost any American’s skin crawl for a moment. Change the word man to woman, and all of those uncomfortable feelings change to normal and nothing out of the ordinary. How can this be? Everyone has experienced that unpleasant sensation of fear creeping into their bodies at least one time in their life. Maybe it was watching a horror movie or walking through an unfamiliar part of town at night, but this sensation is unlike any other feeling that humans can produce. It can become the most important survival instinct that a person can rely on. Although, in our day and age, as Dr. Karl Albrecht states, "Fear seems to have gotten a bad rap amongst most human beings." Fear is certainly not the most popular feeling and emotion that occurs in humans. People today view fear as a nuisance, and it tends to be regarded as a quality of the weak and helpless. With the education of knowing that fear is essential, people would discover that fear can quickly become any human’s most valuable resource. An analysis of fear, and recognizing its importance, confirms why fear is still needed in humans for survival today.
A liberal is often described as a person who is liberal and can accept change. They are the opposite of conservatives, and are on the left wing of politics. A conservative is often seen as a person who favors traditional views and dislikes change. They are on the right wing of politics and prefer less regulation. They both have many contradictions between each other especially in the media, courts, and congress.
Liberalism and fascism present two very different understandings of freedom. On one hand, liberalism provides freedom whereas fascism provides a lack of liberty. This essay will argue that liberalism and fascism provide two different ideas of freedom and to discuss this through the differences and similarities between the two. In order to argue that point, we need to address the meanings of freedom, the idea of freedom in both ideologies, and then the key similarities and differences between liberty in fascism and liberalism.
Modern day society is engrossed in a battle for protection of individual rights and freedoms from infringement by any person, be it the government or fellow citizens. Liberalism offers a solution to this by advocating for the protection of personal freedom. As a concept and ideology in political science, liberalism is a doctrine that defines the motivation and efforts made towards the protection of the aforementioned individual freedom. In the current society, the greatest feature of liberalism is the protection of individual liberty from intrusion or violation by a government. The activities of the government have, therefore, become the core point of focus. In liberalism, advocacy for personal freedom may translate to three ideal situations, based on the role that a government plays in a person’s life. These are no role, a limited role or a relatively large role. The three make up liberalism’s rule of thumb. (Van de Haar 1). Political theorists have