Language In John Winthrop's Poetry

764 Words2 Pages

While John Winthrop presents the majority of his works in a straightforward manner, his account of the delivery of Anne Hutchinson’s child comes off as contemptuous and apathetic. The heightened sense of superiority over Hutchinson’s plight expresses to the audience Winthrop’s views; from his point-of-view he is trying to express that Hutchinson got what she deserved, making the audience uneasy and horrified at what he is discussing. In the first part of Winthrop’s recount, he comes off detached. He does not particularly seem to care that Hutchinson is having a child and makes the statement like a passing comment. He follows up his comment with the contemptuous phrase “was delivered of a monstrous birth,” (Winthrop 183) and the jarring difference …show more content…

In the Puritan era, people would take Winthrop’s view and most likely scorn and shame Hutchinson. To the Puritan’s, Hutchinson’s miscarriage would directly correlate with her standing with God, disrupted and in need of atonement. In society today, however, this depiction would be seen as private and inappropriate to say the least. Time has changed the impact of Winthrop’s language, though the emotional reaction the reader receives is just as strong. The hypercritical nature of using words like “much less to discern from whence every string did fetch” (Winthrop 183) serves to lower his view of Hutchinson. The bad blood between these two heightens the animosity and fuels Winthrop’s contemptuous and apathetic …show more content…

He points out a preacher by name as opposed to just saying a physician, indicating the praise he was placing on the man. Going out of his way to make Hutchinson’s experience as brutal and almost sacrilegious in nature lets the reader take “comfort” in knowing that she deserved what happened to her. In contrast, these harsh tones used by Winthrop serve only to distance us from the speaker. At one point in his entry he wrote that the miscarriage reminded him of “the swims of some fish,” (183). The tone is amused, perhaps thinking that he’s being witty with his comparison, but it further reinforces are hesitation in trusting him. Furthermore, he concludes his journal entry by comparing two specific “lumps” to “liver or congealed blood” (Winthrop 183). Referring to Hutchinson’s miscarriage as similar to not only congealed blood, but liver, something that he likely ate at one point in his life, is disturbing. Allowing for the comparison to be made formats the sentence as harsh and caustic. No sympathy can be found in the comment, rather his recurring apathy and contempt. The tone of Winthrop’s recount of Hutchinson’s miscarriage is contemptuous and apathetic, supported by his harsh comments and clinical presentation of the scene. The overall tone causes the modern-day readers to not only recoil from Winthrop, but form a barrier

Open Document