Language Change In English

1270 Words3 Pages

Just like any other language, English is changing – it borrows or creates new words and changes the meaning, spelling or pronunciation of old ones. These mostly occur in order to satisfy our society 's ever-changing needs, but some people label them as abnormal, impure or even damaging factors to the language while conveniently disregarding the fact that English as we know it is the result of centuries of cumulative variations and that picking a modern standard of perfect English is nothing short of arbitrariness that arose from their desire to keep rigid linguistic standards. Not only do we lack the grounds to label this type of change as bad, but by looking at the history of the language and by comparing their nature with the processes of …show more content…

However, what we are witnessing in recent years and the reason some people start opposing change is the emergence of the most powerful tool of linguistic contact we have ever seen: the Internet. Serving as an open market for ideas, new types of entertainment and creating new requirements for the language to fulfill, the Internet determined new words and forms to appear at an amazingly high rate – the FBI actually built a 3,000-word glossary of Internet slang, most of it, albeit, obsolete3. When seeing such a number, it seems reasonable to argue that introducing so many new words in the English language in such a short time span generates confusion and loss of mutual intelligibility. Furthermore, upon examining these words, we run into egregious abbreviations that are nothing short of pointless, such as BFFLTDDUP (best friends for life until death do us part). However, most of those words disappear after a short while and they rarely make it outside the Internet4. Those that make it simply managed to pass the scrutiny of large numbers of native speakers and thus they are eligible to be labeled as an improvement to the language in one way or another. Therefore, neither the volume nor the nature of …show more content…

Some, such as Norman Tebbit5 go even further and say that relaxing the standards is disrespectful to English and it can even corrupt people into dropping other standards, such as morals or hygiene. Besides the egregious slippery slope argument, they clearly confuse treating English respectfully with regarding it as a crumbling castle6 that must be protected and maintained as close to its original form as possible. This simply diminishes its ability to evolve and adapt to the ever-changing requirements of human society – new concepts, such as a computer or new means of communication, such as SMS or VoIP will keep appearing in society and English must have an elevated degree of freedom to be able to adapt, For instance, if in the future, self-driving cars become common, we are very likely to desire a shorter way to refer to it, such as autocar(recycling an old word), SDC (abbreviation) or even simply car (at a point where cars driven by humans become obsolete). There might be ways to work around those limitations, but that would require reshaping those new elements to fit the old patterns – we should let those elements develop freely and the language adapt when needed, not the other way

Open Document