Labelling Theories' Contribution to the Sociological Understanding of Crime and Deviance

1063 Words3 Pages

Labelling Theories' Contribution to the Sociological Understanding of Crime and Deviance

Becker is the main sociologist studying labelling theory on deviance,

he argues that 'social groups create deviance by making the rules

whose infraction constitutes deviance.' Meaning acts only become

deviant when observers perceive it and define it as deviant. An

example of this would be the act of nudity, it is accepted in the

bedroom between husband and wife or on a nudist camp, but when a

stranger was to enter the bedroom, or someone was to streak across a

sporting event, others would usually see this as deviant, and this

deviancy would become a label on the individual.

Several factors affect what the audience would perceive as deviant,

such things as, who commits the act; when and where it is committed;

who observes the act; and negotiations between those in the act.

It is often those who respond to the acts who label the act deviant

rather than the behaviour of the individual. To stress this, Becker

uses the example of a brawl between youngsters, in a working-class

area police would see the act as sign of delinquency whereas if it was

to occur in a wealthy neighbourhood it would just be classed as

youthful high spirits.

Because Becker concentrates on the interaction between the potential

deviant and the agents of social control (observers) he is following

the interactionist perspective.

Due to the fact that individuals usually find their self-concepts

through the responses of others, it is likely according to Becker,

that after the individual has been labelled as deviant, they progress

down the path of a 'deviant career' and it...

... middle of paper ...

...being committed.

Becker also outlines moral problems He questions where the researchers

sympathies should lie, should they side with the 'underdog' or should

they judge criminal behaviour as wrong?

To evaluate the contribution of the labelling theorists to the study

of the sociology of deviance, it can be said that it depends on how

the theory is viewed. If the theory is seen as ' a theory with all the

achievements and obligations that go with the title' then it has many

flaws. But if, as Becker suggests, we attempt to consider the theory

as just a way of looking at deviance, then the contribution can be

great, as it opened up a study of the individual after he has

committed an act of deviance.

It can be concluded that labelling theory continues its usefulness, as

long as deviant behaviour continues to exist.

More about Labelling Theories' Contribution to the Sociological Understanding of Crime and Deviance

Open Document