Kwame Anthony Appiah Summary

1165 Words3 Pages

Kwame Anthony Appiah is a contemporary philosopher born in London. Although raised in the “Western” world, he comes from Ghanaian descent, making his life rich in culture. He presents a compelling argument in his piece “The Case for Contamination”. Appiah argues that we are living in a globalized world, and that while characteristics and ideas in society are changing, it does not necessarily mean that there is a loss of culture. His “case for contamination” preaches the notion that sometimes change is good, and that in order for us to thrive as a society, change is need and should be welcomed with grateful attitude.
Appiah starts of his piece of describing a traditional Ghanaian ceremony that Appiah states the world is unfamiliar with (unless of course, you are from Ghana). He describes the rich scenery that surrounds him and the buzzing of people as they await for the king. However, he notes that the scenario has changed: as the people wait for their king, they are talking on their cellphones, they are texting, and they are participating in millennial practices. He goes on to explain …show more content…

When I attended Sunday mass with my grandmother, the priest spoke of good versus evil...and then he spoke about bluetooth. He literally spent fifteen minutes talking about the bluetooth device in his car and used it in an analogy to preach his good versus evil sermon. Why? Because he knew that in order to get his message across, he had to deliver it in a way that the younger generation would understand, and although he used modern methods to get his message across, he still delivered the central idea that he wanted. This is what Appiah is arguing: in order to grow as a civilization we must accept change, but change does not mean that culture will be

Open Document