Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
reflection on king lear by shakespeare
Introduction on shakespeare and King Lear
analysis of king lear shakespeare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: reflection on king lear by shakespeare
King Lear is a Christian Play About a Pagan World
It is evident that King Lear contains references to both the Christian
and Pagan doctrine. However, they seem to be expressed in entirely
different styles. King Lear is purposefully set in a pre Christian era
with numerous references to classical Gods but conversely there
appears to be a striking resonance of Christian theology throughout
the play. These echoes appear in various forms including the idea of
Edgar being a Christ-like figure and also the presence of a supposed
divine justice. Therefore there is truth in the view that although
King Lear has a pagan setting, its significance is ultimately relating
to Christianity.
Perhaps the most obvious way in which Shakespeare creates the pagan
setting is through the specific mentions of non-Christian gods. When
looking at the first scene it is apparent Shakespeare has deliberately
seasoned it with pagan references, an example being Lear's response to
Cordelia's unwillingness to speak,
'by the sacred radiance of the sun,
The mysteries of Hecate and the night'.
Shortly after this, Lear's rage is aimed at Kent for his defence of
the king's supposedly wicked daughter, when he swears, 'by Apollo' and
'by Jupiter'. Another instance that shows Lear appealing to deities
rather than the Christian belief of a singular being occurs during his
exposure to the storm on the heath,
'Let the great Gods,
That keep this dreadful pudder o'er our heads,
Find out their enemies now.'
All these quotes therefore demonstrate that King Lear is deliberately
set in a pre-Christian era.
However, this is not conclusive evidence that...
... middle of paper ...
...ester's
attempted suicide and the implication of Kent's without arousing shock
and disapproval from the paying audience, as it was believed that such
behaviour prevailed in this 'unnatural' era.
In conclusion, the view that King Lear is 'a Christian play about a
pagan world' is entirely plausible. The characters openly speak to and
appeal to non-Christian gods and they doubt divine justice, suggesting
that, 'They kill us for their sport.' This therefore creates a pagan
setting for the play. However, there are definite Christian ideas
running throughout the play which manifest themselves mainly in Edgar
and Lear. Therefore, there is an inclination to agree with J C
Maxwell, as despite the setting of the King Lear being Christian, its
morals and concepts of atonement and redemption, lean towards
Christian theology.
Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus demonstrates how aggressive challenges and divisions are born out of conflicting belief systems. For example, because the Roman citizens, the Goths, and Aaron the Moor all differ in matters of consciousness, tension ensues. Nicholas Moschovakis comments extensively about these clashes in his essay ““Irreligious Piety” and Christian History: Persecution as Pagan Anachronism in Titus Andronicus,” and Moschovakis not only magnifies persecution, but he remarks extensively about the major elements in Titus Andronicus that can be understood as anachronistic. While Moschovakis carefully and thoroughly observes the Shakespearean realms of violent “human sacrifice,” the “relevance of Judeo-Christian sacrificial discourses,” the anti-papist Elizabethan attitudes, and other religious and pagan traditions, Moschovakis plainly admits that “Titus evades all attempts to be read as partisan invective” (Moschovakis 462). Because Shakespeare included a wide range of conflict and overlapping belief systems, assertions tend to become, as Moschovakis puts it, “curiously inconsistent” and “overshadowed” (Moschovakis 462). What can be claimed as transparent in Titus Andronicus, and what I think is appealing to the masses, is that Shakespeare drew upon the major controversial motifs in human history and religion, and he included the evils of hypocrisy which allow for realistic interest regardless of what your religious or political stance is. Moreover, I would argue that Shakespeare exposes a more obvious anachronistic element that can serve in expanding Moschovakis’ arguments. Titus Andronicus demonstrates the time honored obsession over first born sons, and because the play includes a first born son in each family t...
Mcneir, Waldo F. "The Role of Edmund in King Lear." Studies in English Literature 1500-1900.Vol. 8, No. 2, Elizabethan and Jacobean Drama (1968): 187-216. JSTOR. Web. 11 Feb. 2014.
Throughout William Shakespeare’s King Lear, many of the characters call out to divine beings in times of anger or pity or distress. There are a few types of idols worshiped and often called upon in the play, such as pagan gods, Nature, and Fortune. What is the role of idolatry and divine providence in King Lear, and how do the characters react to the various idols? The idea of idolatry comes up mainly in Seán Lawrence’s article “‘Gods That We Adore’: The Divine in King Lear.” Lawrence talks about the various characters who “invoke idols who are conceptual, not material, constructions,” and the fact that they use their “religion” as a justification for their own moralities, actions, and power, despite their different motives (145). Lawrence
Throughout King Lear, Shakespeare gives the reader small moments of human goodness to contrast the evil in the play. L.C. Knights describes it as "affirmation in spite of everything," (Coyle). These affirmative actions are clearly seen in response to the immorality, twisted values and evil that are so common throughout this play. These moments are used to give the reader an underlying faith in the human spirit despite the clear role of immorality and a lack of values. The instances of genuine human goodness allow Shakespeare to bring out intense evil and tragedy in his characters and plot without taking away all hope in humanity.
In Shakespeare story King Lear, two of the women were portrayed as emasculating and disloyal while the third was honest and truthful. Showing, that most women who have power can’t be trusted. The story told of a king named Lear who had three daughters named Goneril, Regan, and Cordelia. Lear had given his two oldest daughters Goneril, and Regan a piece of land even though they had lied to their father telling him feelings that they didn’t really have. Then there was his youngest daughter she was as honest and truthful as any other child could be.
King Lear is the protagonist within the play, he wears the label of a successful
Critical Study of Shakespeare's King Lear In this production of Shakespeare's King Lear, a feminist reading of the play has been chosen to be presented to the audience. Certain important factors must be taken into consideration as to how this reading will be reflected on stage. Thus, we will examine, in detail, two important scenes: Act I, scene i, and Act IV, scene iv, their impact on the action and main issues of the play (ambition/ greed, power, corruption, appearance versus reality and growth through suffering) and how the characters, specifically the women roles, are to be portrayed to reflect this particular critical reading. Act I, scene i, is worthy of our attention as a valid representation of the major issues within the play, an impetus for the play's ensuing conflict and a display of the nature of the characters. The scene opens with Gloucester and Kent discussing Lear's plan to retire and partition his kingdom amongst his daughters.
Milward, Peter. "Chapter 1: Meta-Drama in Hamlet and Macbeth." Shakespeare's Christianity: The Protestant and Catholic Poetics of Julius Caesar, Macbeth, and Hamlet. Ed. Beatrice Batsona. Waco, TX: Baylor UP, 2006. 1-18. Questia. Web. 10 Dec. 2013.
...wo of them as “God’s spies” (Lear, V.3.17). This is the first time that Lear refers to God rather than a god or gods. In this metaphor, he and Cordelia are God’s employees and dependents rather than a necessary part of a natural order. He does not form his divine reference as an oath; he neither commands nor supplicates. It is a sweet vision and a sharp contrast to Lear’s earlier invocations of the gods. Were there some divine preceptor bent on teaching Lear an earthly lesson, he could safely say that it was learnt. But the play, of course, continues. What is important, finally, is not that Lear learns, but that we the audience learn. One of the most important aspects of this learning is anticipated by Kent, who first points out that any invocation of Jupiter can be countered by an opposite invocation of Juno to the same effect, which is to say none at all.
King Lear as a Tragedy Caused by Arrogance, Rash Decisions and Poor Judgement of Character
King Lear by Shakespeare portrayed the negative effects of power resulting in destruction caused by the children of a figure with authority. Through lies and continual hatred, characters maintained a greed for power causing destruction within their families. The daughter’s of Lear and the son Gloucester lied to inherit power for themselves. Edmund the son of Gloucester planned to eliminate his brother Edgar from his inheritance.
Religion was a major factor in a number of Shakespeare’s plays. Religion motivated action and reasoning. In Shakespeare’s “The Merchant of Venice,” religion was more than a belief in a higher being; it reflected moral standards and ways of living. In the “Merchant of Venice,” “a Christian ethic of generosity, love, and risk-taking friendship is set in pointed contrast with a non-Christian ethic that is seen, from a Christian point of view, as grudging, resentful, and self-calculating.” (Bevington, pg. 74) Although Shakespeare writes this drama from a Christian point of view he illustrates religion by conflicts of the Old Testament and the New Testament in Venetian society and its court of law. These Testaments are tested through the Christians and Jews of Venice.
It is said that no other playwright illustrates the human condition like William Shakespeare. Furthermore, it is said that no other play illustrates the human condition like King Lear. The story of a bad king who becomes a good man is truly one of the deepest analyses of humanity in literary history; and it can be best seen through the evolution of Lear himself. In essence, King Lear goes through hell in order to compensate for his sins.
The Tragedy of King Lear King Lear is a tragic story by William Shakespeare is a story of a man King Lear and his decision that led to his fate and the fate of others. With every tragic story comes a tragic hero. The tragic hero of the story is King Lear. According to the definition of a tragic hero one must be born into nobility, endowed with a tragic flaw, doomed to make a serious error in judgement, fall from great heights or high esteem, realize they have made an irreversible mistake, and faces and accepts death with honor meets a tragic death. King Lear meets all of these qualities.