1.2 million students drop out if school every year or 7,000 every day or one student every 26 seconds. That’s almost the population of New Hampshire dropping out of school but that’s only in one year. Kids should be paid to have good grades at school, in low-income households. Some people will argue where will we get the money from to pay the kids. However, it will help the dropout rate of kids dropping out of school. Paying the kids will also help kids in poverty and poor, want to try in school.
Cleary, most kids dread coming to school every day. How do you make them want to go to school every day? What would happen if you paid students? would you want to go to school every day? It would help the poverty rate and let students try in school. Students from low-income areas 2.4 times more likely to drop out from school than a kid from a middle-income household. According to Bureau of labor statistics, ”high school graduates earn a median of $678 a week, well workers without a high school diploma earn a median of $493 a week.” In 2009 the world bank reported the probability of rural Mexico entering secondary school increases by 33% and urban Mexico dropout rate decreases 20% between 16-19. Just by paying them to go to school. This shows just paying kids will help the
…show more content…
It will help the dropout rate of kids. For a family a four low income around $24,000 a year. 15 million/21%/of families live in under the federal poverty line/ consider poor. Researchers show that 43% of families need third the income for basic needs. Children low-income families in the USA have less than an high school education. 68% have a high school education. 30% have some college education or more. Kids have to be paid to go to school because as the family goes down by generation by generation they will get poorer and poorer. Kids have to be paid or the people in poverty is just going to get bigger and
Arguments for: This plan gives parents greater control of their children's schooling. It also provides poorer parents an opportunity for private education. The government's role would be confined to ensuring that schools met minimum standards.
“Beginning in 2007, his [Roland Fryer Jr.] project paid out $6.3 million to students in 261 urban schools...from low-income families” (Sandel 52). As a result, paying students for good grades has an impact on many people, not only students but teachers as well. Students should be paid for good grades because they will be able to save the money they earn for the future, it will motivate them to do well in school, and it will increase their scores on AP exams. With the money that students earn for their good grades, they can save it for their future. According to student Brett Upperman, “‘Kids need money so we can save it for college.
...of money, but money alone is not going to solve it. There are always going to be people that are going to take for granted their education. It is the government’s responsibility to see education be equal for all, but also an individual responsibility to take the time to sit down with each other and talk about the importance of school, learning, and education.
Education is a fundamental aspect of any civilized nation. The goal of public education in America is to turn uninformed children into knowledgeable citizens who are fully capable of participating in a society driven by democracy and economics. Students drop out every year by the hundreds of thousands, and those who remain receive a less than satisfactory educational experience due to lack of funding, inadequate teachers, and flawed educational strategies. Americans must improve school funding and increase teacher pay to ensure all students receive quality primary and secondary education as well as reduce remediation and drop out rates through improved learning standards, effective assessment tools, and early-college initiatives that prepare students for college and the workforce.
When it comes to drop outs, those students do not seem to realize how close they truly are to success, high school is such a small part of a person’s life and some of those people have problems completing their education. Even though there is not enough funds to make sure all students can complete their high school careers, I believe the amount of high school students dropping out is getting too high because education is a large part of our civilization, you need to have a certain knowledge base in order to get by and students need education in order to get further in their life goals. If we created more opportunities, used a high amount of the state money towards education, there would be a higher completion rate of high school graduates.
Society wants us to go to school but they continue to raise the price which doesn’t make any sense. If this would happen, do you know how much joy would spring across America? Everyone would be happy and wouldn’t have to worry about paying cash for knowledge. Those who teach students can still get paid but not by the hands of the growing students but the government.
Many high school students have a job that they go to after school which takes up their time that they could be using for homework and studying. If we were to pay these students for their good grades then they would no longer have the need for a job and could get even better grades and would even be able to take harder classes because of the extra time they would have to study and for homework. With the extra time that students would receive they could progress their education even
Dropping out of school may seem reasonable to pupils now, but can have a negative impact in the long run. According to a data collection on average income, “High School Diploma- $27,380. High School Dropout- $19,540”( Source 3). One can clearly see that children who did not dropout of high school made more money than children who did. Money is an essential part of human life and raising the dropout age can increase the pay of many adolescents. Based on Paul Moran’s talk with Missy Remiss, “Those without a high school diploma have lower earnings, higher
A total of 3,030,000 students drop out of high school annually in the United States, thirty six percent of whom drop out in the ninth grade (SB). With each student that drops out, there must also be the thought of said student’s future and how he or she will affect the futures of others. The overwhelming amount of teenagers leaving school will have long term effects on the economy. Assuming a student who has dropped out of school is not going to pursue getting a GED (General Education Development), then according to drop out rates that student “will not be eligible for ninety percent of jobs currently offered in the United States” (SB). By not earning a degree, a dropout cannot make the same amount as a college graduate or even someone who has achieved a diploma. Without being able to get a stable job to support a daily life, people turn to the government for help which in turn cost the public billions of dollars every year. Claudio Sanchez from the National public Radio defined taxpayer’s losses to be “up to 350 billion a year in lost wages, taxable income, health, welfare, and incarceration costs among others” (Zhao). With the public’s loss of money there is no telling how much of what is going where. The money going towards supporting dropouts is a large miss use, seeing as dropouts could have potentially continued school. Students ending education early on and relying on government support will continue to take the economy into an unstable downturn.
Despite negative opinions concerning the effectiveness of the public school system, there is no denying that it keeps many young adults off the streets and out of trouble. The public school system provides meals, care, and education. The same can be done for young children across the board without families spending money. This solution would require an allocation of funds from the U.S. Government, primarily through tax dollars. This would be a worthwhile expenditure as it is investing in children, the future of
Did you know that schools in some places are actually giving kids money for good grades? If schools wish students to be self-motivated and have a desire for learning because it’s valuable to them, then schools should not pay students for excellent grades. Paying students for good grades can lead to kids having pressure to earn good grades. In addition, the students who are payed will not succeed academically in the long run. Also, they are not self-motivated so when they are not getting paid they will stop trying. From pressuring to get good grades, not succeeding academically in the long run, and not having self-motivation, there are several negative effects of paying students for marvelous grades.
First, we must increase the income tax of the richest people or the top two tax brackets and divide that extra tax money we collected to public schools in poor areas. This idea was mentioned in a research by professor Picus from University of California Rossier School of Education. Although the idea does not sound very fair to the richest people, it is what needs to be done for California school system to improve statewide. The gap of expenditure per student in higher and low-income districts is too great. According to Just Schools California, districts like Palo Alto spend more than $10,000 per pupil, while largely low-income communities like Lynwood spend around $6000 per pupil. There are rich people who donate a large amount of money to schools every year because they have a lot of extra money and they like to do their part for the society. In fact, the wealthiest Californians have a lot of extra cash even after they bought their Lamborghinis and holiday mansions. Increase the income tax of these people by as little as 1% or 2% will not affect them much, but will benefit a lot to all Californian students, especially those in the poor areas. The reason this extra money will be given to only schools in low-income areas is because the current taxes on wealthier areas is high enough to gi...
Although learning has its own rewards, some students respond better to money. This essay explains how students will be paid and the reasons that they should receive money for getting good grades. Some reasons that students should be paid are: if students received rewards for having good grades, fewer students would drop out, graduates would be better educated, people would seek higher education, less crime would be committed, less people would rely on the government, and graduates would be more qualified for better jobs. In 2009, an experiment by MDRC was conducted in two community colleges in Louisiana State for low-income students. One group of students was offered $1,000 each semester if they could attend college at least half time, and maintain an average above a C while another group did not receive the supplement.
In conclusion, students should be paid to do well in school because it has many benefits to the student. Those benefits include motivation to get good grades, the money would help the student financially, and the student would learn how to manage their money more effectively. School is a big part of every person’s life, so it should be more rewarding to the
Some people argue that parents should have the choice to send their children to whatever school they want, however, if we drain public school dollars to fund private school education we create an unequal system where well off children are better educated and less fortunate children are left without resources or access to a quality education. Inequities in funding and educational resources place poor children in low-performing schools with run-down facilities and ineffective teachers (Giving Point).These inequalities in resources contributes to students getting discouraged and detached, and hurts our whole society. Public education in America was created to equalize opportunity; instead it’s neglecting poor students and limiting their life choices.Arizona’s tax