More handpicked essays just for you.
Indigenous people of australia
Aboriginal culture australia introduction paragraph
Cultural analysis of australia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
This poem describes the lack of patriotism our country expresses. In the first line “Despite what Dorothea has said about the sun scorched land, you’ve never really loved her” not only shows personification (a reoccurring poetic device) but it also focuses on the true feelings of the Indigenous Australians, in particular Kevin Gilbert. The personification within this line creates a sense of a personal relationship between the reader and our country. This starting line of the poem sets the tone for the entire poem, astringent and solemn. Even before reading the poem it is easy to decipher the inimical tone through the title “The New True Anthem”. Kevin Gilbert never ceases to accentuate the disesteem he feels for the Australian public. The pride Australians exhume for our country is quickly challenged with his 4th – 6th lines - “you pollute all the rivers and litter every road, your barbaric graffiti”. This poem also challenges the beloved poem “My Country” written by Dorothea McKellar. Which also relates back to the first line “Despite what Dorothea has said…” as it is a jab at the iconic poem “My Country” and its subject matter. …show more content…
Whilst incarcerated in jail for killing his wife, Gilbert was subjected to hate causing little motivation or access to do anything which lead him to the path of poetry. His ardent feelings towards Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders rights are predominant through this poem, with words such as ‘injustice rules supremely’ referring to the non-Indigenous Australians racially profiling the original owners of this land. His use of pronouns throughout this poem purposely directs the blame of the ruining the perfect land onto the Australian public. An example of this is the line “the beaches and the mountains are covered with your
Pearson conveys the need to take responsibility for the consequences of past discriminations, encouraging open, harmonious and hopeful beliefs of reconciliation as opposed to assigning guilt. He calls for the metaphoric “opening of hearts” as Australians strive to overcome inequities of the past and build a future based on the beliefs of justice and equality. Pearson expresses his hope for reconciliation through negative diction and alliteration, “Legacy of unutterable shame” and “derogation and diminution”, representing the historic suffering of Indigenous Australians. Thus, it is clearly evident that he does not manipulate the audience into having to act against the misfortune of the past, but rather have an emotional connection with them through powerful rhetoric to indirectly assist the audience to gain an insight of the emotional and physical damage of Aborigines. Furthermore, Pearson also incorporate inclusive language through the repetition of “our nation” and the action that “we” must take to correct our past injustices. This is effective in reconciling the divide between European Australians, whilst reinforcing national values. Pearson’s approach depicts society’s challenge to “accept responsibility and accept shame”, reflecting his belief that this was the ideal solution to address reconciliation.
“a verse for the cheated” is written in free verse as it has no rhyming scheme and lines of varied length. The poem has a reflective tone as it reflects on the way that Aboriginals have been treated in the past in Australia. A sad tone is depicted in the poem as it discusses the negative effects of colonialism, and allows the audience to consider their situation.
Like in the poem, illiteracy leaves a person vulnerable to be taken advantage of. This poor soul unknowingly signed away the rights to his own freedom by leaving his mark.
Although not blatantly obvious at first, Kenneth Slessor’s emotive and poignant poem Beach burial is a poem concerned with raising the awareness of national identity. Now I found this hard to believe at first – For me to be able to use this poem, (as it has been my one of my favourites for years) I though that for it to have ANYTHING to do with national identity I would have had to use my creative ability to dissect and warp aspects of the poem that COULD have something to do with national identity if the poet had actually CHOSEN to write about national identity. Basically a lot of windbagging- and as much I was looking forward to see how great my powers of persuasion were I finally realised that they wouldn’t be necessary. I realised that even though Slessor’s Beach Burial doesn’t ramble on about the Australian lifestyles and the Australian landscapes, It is a poem solely based on the importance of national identity… heck- it doesn’t even mention the word ‘Australia’ in it! But what Slessor is trying to say here doesn’t refer just to the Australian identity it refers to the importance of every countries national identity and, in the long run, the unimportance of it.
In my opinion, the purpose of the poem is to bring awareness to the loss of aboriginal culture in society today. This is because the poem gives a perspective on city life and how it has affected her memories of what her life used to be like. It gives us insight to
Throughout the poem, the speaker gives the impression that the justice system within the nation is invalid, therefore it impacts negatively. Since the government is not assisting the citizens as much as they should, the people－society, have to take actions into their own hands. For instance, Stafford asserts, “justice will take us millions of intricate
There are many different ways of living in our Multicultural Australian Society, but is there a right one? You could be either rich or poor, Catholic or Christian, skinny or fat, popular or unpopular, all of which are different ways of living. The poems which Komninos composes, the article written by Laura Demasi and the television show Big Brother, all explore the aspects of living in an Australian society and the affects they have on people.
However, she was made famous for her controversial Australian poems displaying her views and strong opposition to the typical Australian values of acceptance. She outlines her immense resentment to Australia for segregating her based on her accent, looks and opinions. ‘You tell me I look strange. Different. You don’t adopt me. You laugh at the way I speak. You think you’re better than me’. She has a large difference in traditions and values to Australia and consequently has been carved to believe by society that she has to either ‘love it, or leave’. Evidently, proving that not only she feels separated and excluded from Australian society but that everyone with a different value, opinion or perspective does, including Indigenous
Australia’s sense of pride and admiration that is declared by Dorothea Mackellar in ‘My Country’ is challenged and questioned by Kevin Gilbert. The title of the poem ‘The New True Anthem,’ suggests Gilbert’s position from the very beginning and implies the fact that this poem is going to be rather bitter and pessimistic. Gilbert criticises Mackellar’s point of view, “Despite what Dorothea has said,” through the use of high modality language such as “hate and tyranny”, “bitter anguish” and “writhing bodies.” The negative connotations in these phrases emphasise the poet’s disgust
...etaphor, “Is running in your veins” like blood, recognises the country as an integral part of life. Furthermore, rhythm created by the omission of commas in “sapphire misted mountains” combined with the rhyme scheme of the makes the tribute more powerful. Consequently the language techniques employed by Mackellar, reinforce her passion of Australia whilst also embracing the audience in an evocative image of her personal experience.
To most of us, the only encounter with Australian identity is through the eye of popular culture. And while most Australians would agree that our national identity is alive and well, pop culture’s fixation on the ‘typical Australian’ is tedious and inaccurate.
Victoria was loved and respected by her subjects, and Australian society at the time was affected greatly by the loss of their beloved Queen. An example of the affection and grief felt by the Australian people is apparent in the following poem, written by J D Horne of Castlemaine, Victoria.
The poems I Hear America Singing, by Walt Whitman, and I, Too, by Langton Hughes, both convey ideal American societies in which to live in. However, while Whitman’s poem focuses on the present American society and highlights the positive attributes of it’s culture, Hughes’ poem is based on the American ethos’ current flaws, while also looking to the future for a more optimal society in which to live.
Brooks’ theme in this poem seems to lean heavily on guilt- “I have heard in the voices of the wind the voices of my dim killed/ children” (11-2) and blame- “Though why should I whine,/ Whine that the crime was other than mine?-“ (22-3).
While on the surface, it may seem understandable that the courts would take away Ella’s child in the wake of her shooting her lover, it actually showcases the cold and impersonal logic upon which the courts operate. Ella’s unforgiving environment stocked with obstacles has forced her to harden herself. She has adapted to an environment that provides her little understanding by hiding any vulnerability or neediness, even to the point that she “turns away the smaller tips, out of pride” (Lines 13-14). Perhaps because of the heavy use of snake imagery, I saw Ella’s struggle to persevere as akin to a wild animal adapting to an unfriendly environment. Ella is a complex character because she can be interpreted in multiple ways, such as “tired and sharp-worded” (Line 2). This poem explores the differences between how a person’s characteristics are viewed with and without understanding