Karen Horney's Observation Of Resistant Children

481 Words1 Page

In nature we are born defenseless and in need to be nurtured by others. When we are babies the only thing we could do well is cry and poop. We are in need of others to take care of us, when we are babies we need to have that safety comfort zone. As Karen Horney’s observation of babies depends on how that baby was attached to their parents. She described three types of attachment which are the secure child, avoidant child and resistant child. The secure child is the one that has the greatest safety zone and is very attached to the mother. The nurture the mother gave the child and love the child received allowed it have such strong tides. This strong bond with the mother allows the child to be more at ease and won’t be crying as much for the …show more content…

The child is always fighting the mother for the love she is trying to give but it’s too late because the trust value is not there. The child will grow up not been able to trust others so that will affect social roles, and as well it will affect their competences of exploring. They will have low self-esteem and their ego will be low in strength. Furthermore, the resistant child is the one that had too little to almost no bond with the mother. These child had not affection from the mother or no other person that will create the safety zone. This child will show aggression behavior such as hitting others to show their incompetent feelings. They will have to little or no social skills with the distrust value the child didn’t receive. They will have little to no ego. They will have problem exploring their environment and create a safety zone in a certain area which the child. This attachments theories predict how the child will be socially and how they will act when they grow up. This attachment is something biological because it’s in our human behavior to start a bond with the person that take cares of us and from there we learn how to trust

Open Document