Deontological Ethical Theory: Kant's Perspective on Duty

1477 Words3 Pages

According to Kant deontological ethical theory focuses on duty. It is viewed that humans have a duty in doing what is ethically right in any given situation. However, the categorical imperative does not have the same ideas it does not consist of duties to our selves. As Kant indicates in idea of the Kingdom of Ends that our duty lies in treating all human being as ends in and of themselves instead of as a means to an end it is perceived as being an extension to our selves. It is based on the desires of a person in how they want to be treated and will succeed as long as the universal good is applied as well. In other words our actions and behaviors applied in our lives we can see others imitating. For instance, can we see a world where everyone …show more content…

Imperative is recognized as being a command and we should exercise our will in this manner. Categorical in virtue is implementing rational will since this happens to be endless with us.

• The formula of the universal law of nature viewed by Kant was that any normal moral idea was considered moral duties directed towards our selves and others with differences between imperfect and perfect duties. However, it may be recognized and viewed into four separate categories of duties: perfect duties to ourselves, perfect duties to others, imperfect duties to ourselves, and imperfect duties to others. Therefore, Kant believes that duty is derived from the CI and that the CI is the fundamental method of morality.

• The humanity formula is based on the idea of respect. Kant believes that with the other formulas the CI is perceived as intuition rather than the Universal Law formula. The humanity formula indicates that using others, as a means to our ends does not apply, this would be absurd in pursuing our goals. The humanity in us should be treated as an end in itself. Our humanity is made up of a collection of things that define us as humans, this includes the ability to engage in self-directed rational behaviors, adapt, and pursue our own ends. Kant also believes that the concept of an end is made up of three senses two being positive and the other being …show more content…

They face ethical dilemmas in their field so they have to be prepared in applying ethical principles to guide them when making decisions, relying on professional principles rather than personal, and resolving ethical problems. Social workers are very well educated around the Code of Ethics, identifying ethical dilemmas, and resolving it. An ethical dilemma consist of making a decision from different courses of action to choose from and no matter what the outcome of the action some ethical principles is compromised meaning there isn’t a perfect solution. However, when determining the course of action in an ethical dilemma it relies on the differences among values, ethics, laws, policies, and morals. It is utilized as a prepositional statement used by social workers in assisting with the right course of action to that particular situation. Ethics are based on a rational and logical reason in order to achieve a decision. However, value is the meaning of something we feel is of worth to us. Such values may inspire ideas of how to achieve equality and social justice. As for morals it describes behavioral conducts that is often times utilized to strengthen relationships. Laws and policies are complex, however, social workers are legally obligated to take this course of action. For instance a social worker may have to break the Code of Ethics in a legal obligation of sharing confidential information, therefore, have to recognize the agencies

More about Deontological Ethical Theory: Kant's Perspective on Duty

Open Document