Julius Caesar Essay: The Fall Of The Tragic Hero

666 Words2 Pages

The Fall of the Tragic Hero: Marcus Brutus Shakespeare wrote Julius Caesar around the early 1600s, and even today scholars argue whether Brutus or Caesar is the tragic hero of the play. The definition of a tragic hero is a person of nobility and honor who unfortunately falls after a struggle against an opposing force. However, the true tragic hero of the play was Marcus Brutus. Throughout the play, Brutus shows that he values honor. This is portrayed through his actions. For example, when he says, “I asked you for gold, which you denied me! I can’t raise money by dishonest means. Heavens! I’d rather turn my heart to coinage and drachmas from my blood, than steal small change from the calloused hands of peasants” (Shakespeare 167). At this moment in the play, Brutus is in desperate need of gold to pay his army. However Brutus goes without the gold instead of stealing from peasants and taking bribes. This is a very honorable act to sacrifice himself rather than sacrificing his honor Brutus is also recognized as noble, by numerous characters, …show more content…

During the play, Brutus was very trusting toward some characters he should not have been. For example, Brutus took Antony’s word that he would not blame the conspirators, and would speak only good of them. Brutus trusted Antony so much, that he left before listening to what he said. This action allowed Antony to arose the crowd and turn them against Brutus, starting the war. Brutus also trusted Cassius, who is the person who persuaded him to join the conspiracy to begin with. He did this mostly through manipulation and compliments. Cassius was deceitful when he left forged letters, supposed to be from Romans, where Brutus would find them. Brutus trusted Cassius, who used him in attempts to gain power and rid Rome of Caesar. Although Brutus was noble, his tragic flaw of too trusting towards people, inevitably led to his

Open Document